Main Inspector reports on the investigation in the Arena Bar
Chief Inspector A. is an professional investigator. He was a law enforcement officer for over 40 many years. Investigating violent crimes that resulted in demise, this kind of as murder, was his specialty. On the night time of 19 to 20 February 2020, the 63-calendar year-outdated, now retired, obtained the alarm at dwelling. 12:30 is there. There was a shooting in Hanau. Many victims. It could be an attack. A. and his colleagues from K11 satisfy at the Offenbach police headquarters. His occupation: to aid Hanau’s colleagues.
With two autos they head to the office in Piazza della Libertà. “One particular crew ought to go to Heumarkt, the other to Kurt-Schumacher-Platz,” A. reviews to the Hanau investigative commission of the Hessian condition parliament. He is the third witness this Monday. Two brokers have presently testified in entrance of him, together with the colleague with whom he was deployed on the night of the criminal offense (see textual content reverse). Subject of negotiation: the emergency exit. Was it open up or shut? A. will not be in a position to say something about this question. He did not discover the emergency exit nor did he shake the door.
A. was there from 2.30am to 6am and examined the bodies: Vili-Viorel Paun in his Mercedes and the two victims in the Arena Bar, Hamza Kurtovic and Said Nesar Hashemi. A. describes the chaos on the place. Ambulances, relations, officials and onlookers everywhere you go. He had in no way expert everything like this in all his years with the police.
No, the chief inspector emphatically claims, he failed to get a image of the crime scene, just an inspection, that is, he explained the wounds on the corpses. “We didn’t have ample workers for all the things else,” he suggests. A thorough criminal offense scene report is made up of every thing. Every drawer, states A., must be open, each individual door, the cash of the cashier counted. The criminal offense scene report is the foundation of each and every prosecutor’s investigation. This connection does not exist in the Hanau circumstance, although it is an unparalleled criminal offense. Family consistently criticized him.
Why is this thorough report not available? The concern continues to be unanswered. Seemingly, a person officer imagined the other would do it. «Normally», clarifies A., «the in depth account is built the future working day, with the gentle. Pictures, 3D recordings, what was in which drawer, where by were being the shells. All of this has to be answered below. “The Point out Prison Police Business office (LKA) was present, suggests A., incorporating:” I assumed they would. “
In an LKA interrogation a person year just after the racist attack, the official skilled will say the following phrase, typically quoted: “Considering the fact that the perpetrator was clearly regarded and dead, no consideration was paid to the facts in this article.” he underlined it and extra: “The judiciary does not investigate the dead”.
Saadet Sönmez, chairman of the Die Linke parliamentary group in the commission of inquiry and deputy to the constituency for the district of Most important-Kinzig, supports just this ruling from 2021 to A. “How could you have identified at that moment that the creator was lifeless, that there wasn’t a second perpetrator? “he asks. AfD and SPD request similar questions.
A. admits that the radio technique could not be relied on that night, but that they experienced been educated by their colleagues in Hanau about the whereabouts, whereabouts and subsequent demise of the author. No, suggests A., contradicting his 2021 claim that this awareness transformed nothing at all about his perform on web page. He labored as common.
–
