Home » Sport » Capitombolo Cavese, Cerignola wins

Capitombolo Cavese, Cerignola wins

The Cavese returns from the difficult trip to Puglia empty-handed: against Cerignola ends 3-1. A match that immediately starts uphill for the Metellians especially due to the raids of Yellowon target in the 13th and 33rd minutes. The guests try to get under them and close the distance with Peretti in the 68th minute. But a minute later there are 10 men left due to the expulsion of Vitale. The hosts scored again at the end of the match to make it 3-1 Salvemini.

BOLD CERIGNOLA (3-5-2): Saracco 6; Visentin 6, Capomaggio 7, Martinelli (36′ pt Velasquez); Coccia 6, Tascone 6.5 (38′ st Sainz-Maza 6), Bianchini 6, Paolucci 6.5, Tentardini 6 (25′ st Russo 6.5); Jallow 8.5 (38′ st Ruggiero), Salvemini 7.5. On the bench: Greco, Fares, Parigini, Faggioli, Carnevale, Lorusso, lurilli, Carrozza, Di Dio. Coach: Raffaele 7.5.
CAVESE (3-5-2): Boffelli 7; Saio 6, Peretti 6, Loreto 6; Rizzo 5.5 (32′ st Barba 6), Citarella 6, Pezzella 7, Vitale 5, Maffei 5.5 (1′ st Sorrentino 7); Diarrassouba 5.5 (32′ st Marranzino 5.5), Vigliotti 6 (27′ st Diop 6). On the bench: Lamberti, Di Somma, Konate, Fornito, Marchisano, Tropea, Badje, Barone. Coach: Maiuri 5.5.
REFEREE: Andeng at Cuneo 6.
RARE: 13′ pt Jallow, 33′ pt Jallow, 22′ st Peretti, 50′ st Salvemini.
NOTE: cold afternoon, ground in excellent condition. Spectators: approximately 2,000. In the 24th minute Vitale was sent off for a second yellow card. Booked: Tentardini, Vitale. Angles: 7-7. Recovery time: 2′; 5′.

#Capitombolo #Cavese #Cerignola #wins

**How did Cerignola’s 3-5-2 formation contribute to their dominance⁢ in midfield and ⁢ability to control the tempo of ⁢the match?**

## World Today ‍News: Post-Match Analysis‌ -⁤ Cavese vs. Cerignola

**Host:** ⁣Welcome back to World⁣ Today News. Today we’re joined by two esteemed football analysts, **[Guest 1 Name]** and **[Guest 2 Name]**, to dissect the thrilling match between Cavese and Cerignola, which ended in a 3-1 victory for the home​ side.

**(Intro music fades)**

**Host:** Let’s jump right in. **[Guest 1 Name]**, Cerignola dominated the​ early stages with Jallow showcasing​ his prowess in front of the goal. What ⁣were⁣ your initial impressions of the⁤ match?

**Guest 1:** Absolutely, the early minutes were a clear indication of Cerignola’s intent. Jallow ‍was electric, and his two goals within the first ⁢33 minutes put Cavese firmly ‍on​ the back foot.

**Host:** ⁢Exactly. **[Guest 2 Name]**, Cavese managed to pull a goal⁣ back through Peretti. Was that a sign of⁢ a potential ⁣comeback? And what factors⁣ contributed to Cavese’s struggles throughout the⁣ match?

**Guest 2:** Peretti’s goal definitely breathed some life back into‌ the Cavese⁤ side.‍ However, Vitale’s red​ card shortly after proved ‍to be the critical ⁣turning⁤ point. ​Playing with 10 men against a‍ surging Cerignola side ⁢proved too ⁤much of a challenge. Cavese seemed to lack​ their usual fluidity in​ midfield, and their defense struggled to cope with Cerignola’s pace and aggression.

**(Transition music)**

**Host:** Let’s delve ‌into the tactical aspects.‍ **[Guest 1 Name]**, Cerignola employed a 3-5-2 formation. How effective was this strategy, and what challenges did it pose for Cavese?

**Guest ⁢1:** ⁢The 3-5-2 formation allowed Cerignola to overload the midfield, giving them numerical superiority in key areas. It also provided them with defensive solidity, making it ⁤difficult ⁢for Cavese to break through.

**Host:** **[Guest 2 Name]**, Cavese⁣ also opted for a 3-5-2. Were there any key tactical differences in their approach compared to Cerignola?

**Guest 2:** While both teams utilized the same formation, Cerignola’s midfield ⁣trio seemed ‍to gel better, controlling the tempo and dictating ⁤the pace of the game. ⁣Cavese⁤ lacked the same cohesiveness in ‌midfield, allowing Cerignola to dominate ‌possession.

**(Transition Music)**

**Host:** Now, looking ahead to the future. **[Guest 1 Name]**, what⁢ are the key takeaways for ​Cavese going forward after this defeat?

**Guest 1:** Cavese need ⁣to address their defensive vulnerabilities. The red card highlighted their discipline issues, ‍and they need to find a more effective way to deal with pressure in midfield.

**(Transition music)**

**Host:** **[Guest 2 Name]**, ⁣Cerignola continue their impressive run. What can we expect from⁤ them in‌ the coming matches?

**Guest 2:** Cerignola ​are playing with confidence and attacking flair. Jallow looks to be in top form, and ‌their midfield is very well-organized. If they continue in this vein, they ‌are certainly contenders for the top spot.

**Host:** Thank you both for your insightful analysis.⁤ This ⁣was ⁣a fascinating match with plenty ⁣of talking points. We look forward to seeing how both Cavese and Cerignola fare in the future.

**(Outro Music)**

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.