The 43-year-old trainee lawyer was launched after her apology underneath the restrictive circumstances of a ban on her affiliation with the lawyer and with the duty to pay a 5,000 euro bond.
The latter had reported her accuser for home violence, with him subsequently abandoning her for a felony violation of non-public information.
In line with data, in her apologetic memorandum the accused denied that she broke the legislation, claiming that she appeared on a tv present to not take revenge on the lawyer with whom – as she says – she had a fleeting love affair, however to cease her personal seduction from the flip the case had taken.
Based mostly on what he argued earlier than the judicial officer “on 28.04.2024 the plaintiff, amongst different issues, hit me and on the identical day I duly filed a summons in opposition to him and the following day I used to be examined by a medical expert. He himself filed a summons in opposition to me after about half a month had handed, and solely when he had already been knowledgeable of my very own summons. Just a few days in the past and (I assume) on the event of one other home violence case, one other pair of attorneys, and my very own case was within the limelight, with out me looking for it.”
He provides that “after the case was made public, plenty of individuals, near the plaintiff and naturally myself, began a course of so as to current myself as unreliable, mentally ailing, that I testify untruths and on the whole that my very own criticism can’t have the identical gravity with the opposite case that occupied the media. So press releases filled with lies had been issued, messages that I’ve exchanged with one other particular person had been offered on broadcasts – that’s, they did what I’m at present accused of getting carried out – and with “journalistic” data an try was made to assemble a picture, with the only real goal of deconstructing of my character, in order that within the upcoming court docket, the place my accuser would be the defendant and I supported the cost of home violence, I’ll seem unreliable.”
Referring to her look on a TV present throughout which she allegedly learn messages she had exchanged with the 69-year-old, on account of which he sued her for breach of non-public information, she defined that “I appeared on a present with the only real goal of stopping my stalking and defending myself and to not offend the plaintiff. Moreover, I did not reveal his id, nor did I attempt to sketch him. Moreover, the truth that the very subsequent day, the plaintiff’s spouse seems and formally proclaims lawsuits, just isn’t defined.”
She notes that “at no level within the controversial TV present was the face of the intruder offered, nor photographed, nor might it’s linked with all the pieces that was offered. Completely nobody within the public or any third celebration might join the “seventy-year-old criminologist” with my accuser. There are no less than a thousand 70-year-old criminologists in Athens, that’s, an virtually indefinite variety of individuals, that on no account might the tv viewer join the face of the plaintiff with the one talked about within the present.”
#Caning #43yearold #lady #wellknown #lawyer #trainee #free
