Belgian court Investigates Crimes Against Humanity Allegations Against Cameroonian President
Table of Contents
A groundbreaking legal action has been filed in Belgium, alleging crimes against humanity against Cameroonian President Paul biya. The complaint, lodged on January 6, 2025, by the Assembly of Democratic and Patriotic Organizations of the Cameroonian Diaspora (CODE), centers on the disappearance of nine young men in Douala, Cameroon, in 2001.
Dr. Janvier Kingué, a CODE board member, and Olivia Bih, head of the organization’s Belgian branch, spearheaded the complaint, which was submitted to investigating judge Daniel Fransen. Their legal team, led by Maître Henri Beauthier, alleges that President Biya, along with eleven other Cameroonian officials and security forces, bears obligation for “disappearances, murders, arbitrary arrests, and rapes,” especially in the Douala region.
The core of the complaint focuses on the disappearance of nine young men – Marc Etaha (38 at the time), Frédéric Ngouffo (34), Chatry Kuété (33), Jean-Roger Tchiwan (33), Eric Chia (32), Charles Kouatou (24), Effician Chia (24), Elysée Kouatou (23), and Fabrice Kuaté (21) – on January 23, 2001. These individuals were initially arrested following a complaint by Annick Souki, who accused them of theft. “After their arrest, the nine young people were held in the Littoral Gendarmerie Legion until January 26, 2001, before being transferred to the Operations Command headquarters,” explained Maître Beauthier. “They were seen there for the last time. Since then, they have vanished.”
The complaint highlights the role of the operational Command (CO), a special gendarmerie unit tasked with combating organized crime in Douala. CODE alleges that the CO’s actions were part of a broader campaign to suppress dissent in the city, which was perceived as being resistant to President Biya’s regime. The complaint cites the Polyvalent Group of the Gendarmerie Intervention, primarily operating in northern Cameroon, as also implicated.
The legal action relies on the principle of universal jurisdiction, allowing Belgian courts to prosecute individuals for crimes against humanity committed abroad. While the Belgian government’s response remains to be seen, this case raises notable international concerns about human rights abuses and accountability for those in power.
“The disappearance of these nine young men is a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle for justice and accountability in Cameroon,” stated Dr. Kingué. ”We believe President Biya and his associates must be held responsible for their actions.”
This case underscores the growing international scrutiny of human rights violations in Cameroon and the potential for legal action under the principle of universal jurisdiction. The outcome of this Belgian investigation will have significant implications for both Cameroon and the broader international community.
International Immunity and the Pursuit of Justice: A Complex Legal Landscape
The intersection of international law and domestic legal systems often creates complex challenges,particularly when high-ranking officials are involved. A recent case highlights the intricacies of international immunity and its impact on the pursuit of justice for alleged human rights violations.
The case centers around the legal complexities surrounding the prosecution of individuals with international immunity, a concept that shields certain officials from legal proceedings in foreign courts. This immunity, often granted to heads of state and other high-ranking government officials, is designed to protect diplomatic relations and prevent interference in the internal affairs of sovereign nations. However, this protection can create significant obstacles for victims seeking redress for alleged human rights abuses.
One notable exmaple involved ivorian Vice President Laurent Gbagbo in 2001.Invited to Brussels by the European Union, he canceled his trip due to concerns about potential prosecution for crimes against humanity in a Brussels court. This incident underscores the tension between international immunity and the desire to hold individuals accountable for alleged wrongdoing.
Belgian law, amended in 2003, attempts to navigate this complex terrain. Article 5, paragraph 3, states: “The international immunity attached to a person’s official capacity prevents the application of this law within the limits established by international law.” This clarification suggests that while immunity exists, it’s not absolute and its scope is defined by international legal norms.
the practical implication is that a president currently in office enjoys immunity from prosecution under Belgian law. Though, legal action could potentially be initiated after they leave office.This principle applies similarly to prime ministers and foreign ministers while they are actively performing their official duties.
This legal framework has implications for cases involving individuals like Paul Biya, whose international immunity would only be lifted upon leaving power. His co-defendants, though, face a different situation. Military officers involved in alleged abuses could be prosecuted in Belgium if they enter the country.
Several additional complaints are pending before Belgian courts.These cases involve victims of the February 2008 riots in Cameroon, prisoners associated with the Movement for the Recovery of Cameroon (MRC), and journalists who were allegedly tortured and murdered. These cases highlight the ongoing struggle to balance the principles of international immunity with the imperative to hold perpetrators of human rights abuses accountable.
The ongoing legal battles underscore the challenges inherent in prosecuting individuals with international immunity. The cases raise significant questions about the balance between protecting diplomatic relations and ensuring justice for victims of alleged human rights violations. The complexities of international law and the pursuit of justice continue to shape the global legal landscape.
Belgium’s Investigation into Cameroon’s President: New frontier in International Justice?
Accusations of human rights abuses, notably against political opponents or demonstrators, against African leaders are often met with international condemnation. But rarely does a case progress beyond stringent denials and the judgment of international bodies. , a Belgian court is defying this trend by launching an investigation into Cameroon’s President Paul Biya for alleged crimes against humanity, a landmark case with the potential to redefine the pursuit of justice for victims of abuses committed by leaders in power.
An Interview with international Law Expert Professor Jean-Pierre Dubois
World Today News Senior Editor Susan Campbell discusses the implications of this unprecedented legal action with Professor Jean-Pierre Dubois, a renowned expert in international criminal law at the University of Brussels:
Campbell: Professor Dubois, this case has drawn considerable international attention. Can you give us a concise overview of the allegations against President Biya?
Dubois: the Belgian complaint, filed by a Cameroonian diaspora association, CODE, centers on the 2001 disappearance of nine young men in Douala.While initially arrested for theft, there’s strong evidence linking their disappearance to the Operations Command (CO), a gendarmerie unit responsible for combating organized crime. CODE alleges these actions where part of a larger pattern of repression by the Biya regime against dissenting voices in Douala.
Campbell: this case hinges on the principle of universal jurisdiction. Could you explain what that means and how it applies here?
Dubois: Universal jurisdiction allows a country to prosecute individuals for certain grave offenses,like crimes against humanity,even if those crimes were not committed on its soil,and the perpetrator is not a citizen. Belgium, like a few other countries, has incorporated this principle into its legal framework, enabling it to investigate and possibly prosecute individuals like President Biya.
Campbell: This case raises complex questions around the issue of immunity for heads of state. Is President Biya, while currently in office, immune from prosecution under Belgian Law?
Dubois: That’s a crucial point. Belgian law recognizes the principle of international immunity, protecting heads of state from prosecution while they remain in office. However, this immunity isn’t absolute and is subject to the norms of international law. This means that upon leaving office, President Biya could become vulnerable to prosecution in Belgium.
Campbell: What are the potential implications of this belgian investigation, both for Cameroon and the broader international community?
Dubois: The outcome of this case could be meaningful. If Belgium, despite potential diplomatic pressure, presses forward with the investigation and potentially brings charges, it will send a strong signal that even high-ranking officials are not above the law. This could embolden victims of human rights abuses in other countries to seek redress through similar legal avenues.
Campbell: Professor Dubois, thank you for shedding light on this complex legal battle.This case will undoubtedly be followed closely by those concerned with human rights and the rule of law worldwide.
Dubois: Thank you. It’s a case that highlights the ongoing tension between the principles of state sovereignty and the pursuit of universal justice. Its resolution will have potentially far-reaching consequences.
