Home » today » Technology » Call of Duty Players Upset Over $80 Price Tag for New Kong-Inspired Cosmetic Item

Call of Duty Players Upset Over $80 Price Tag for New Kong-Inspired Cosmetic Item




Call of Duty Community Outraged Over $80 Melee Weapon Cosmetic

Monstrous Costs of In-Game Cosmetics Sparks Controversy

Call of Duty players are expressing their frustration with the recently released cosmetic item inspired by the new film Godzilla X Kong: New Empire. This new melee weapon, called the “B.E.A.S.T Glove,” has caused an uproar due to its exorbitant $80 price tag.

The B.E.A.S.T Glove, modeled after King Kong’s robo-arm from the film, is designed to be used by soldiers in the game’s Warzone mode. However, players are required to purchase four separate $20 DLC packs to unlock the weapon, making it unattainable through in-game achievements.

Many players are expressing their disappointment, highlighting the absurdity of spending such a high amount of money for a single cosmetic item. They argue that the glove itself lacks customization options and fails to provide any unique gameplay experience.

Despite the community’s outrage, this prevalence of expensive in-game cosmetics is not an isolated incident. Gaming companies such as Activision, Blizzard, and Epic have been incorporating increasingly expensive cosmetic items in games like Fortnite and Diablo, generating significant profits. However, this trend raises concerns about an industry that relies heavily on microtransactions.

The high cost of cosmetic items, including an $80 gorilla-themed melee weapon, raises questions about the impact of consumer spending in the gaming industry. With microtransactions accounting for a substantial portion of digital game spending, it is crucial to reflect on the implications of this growing trend.

It is disappointing to witness the normalization of expensive cosmetics, as it reinforces the capitalist nature of the gaming industry. Players are confronted with the choice of either spending substantial amounts of money or missing out on content within the game. As this practice continues, it is crucial for players to critically evaluate the value of these cosmetic items.

While the latest addition to Call of Duty’s cosmetic lineup has undoubtedly stirred controversy, it ultimately highlights the need for a more inclusive and accessible approach to in-game content. As players voice their concerns, it is now up to the gaming industry to respond and provide solutions that promote fairness and transparency.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.