/View.info/ A recently amended law in California will add “confirmation” of a child’s gender transition to the state’s standard for parental responsibility and child welfare, declaring any parent who does not confirm their child’s transgenderism guilty of child abuse. ” according to this law.
AB 957 was passed by the California State Assembly on May 3, but its co-author amended it after several hours of work in the California State Senate on June 6.
Rep. Laurie Wilson wrote the bill and introduced it on February 14. San Francisco state Sen. Scott Weiner sponsored it. Wilson’s child identifies as transgender.
Originally, AB 957 required courts to consider whether the child’s parents were “gender affirming” in custody cases. The Weiner Amendment completely rewrites California’s standard of care for children.
AB 957, as amended, “shall include parental confirmation of a child’s gender identity as part of the child’s health, safety and welfare”changing the definition and application of the entire California Family Code.
Under California Family Code Section 3011, California courts will have the full power to remove a child from their parents’ home if the parents do not approve of LGBTQ+ ideology.
By changing the definition of what it is “the health, safety and well-being of the child”, schools, churches, hospitals and other organizations that interact with children will have to recognize “gender change” under minors by default — or risk being charged with child abuse.
AB 957 could also expand the list of organizations that provide “evidence” for “non-confirmation” of gender in California courts.
Due to the addition of “gender confirmation” to California’s “health, safety and welfare” qualification standards, California courts will now be able to accept reports of “gender-based violence’ by progressive activist organizations—as long as they claim to provide “services for victims of sexual violence” or domestic violence.
Essentially, the boy can report his parents to the local school’s Gay Street Alliance club or other LGBTQ+ organization, which can then report child abuse to the boy’s parents.
Incredibly, the bill does not provide any definition of what would qualify as “non-confirmation” the gender of the child.
As Susan Luthi of the Washington Free Beacon notes, “The bill does not differentiate between the age of the child, how long the child has identified as transgender, or confirmation of social transition versus medical treatment for gender reassignment.”
It remains unclear what law or precedent California courts can rely on to determine whether a parent has affirmed, let alone set a standard applicable to all situations.
AB 957 is not Weiner’s first attempt to legitimize transgenderism for children. Last year, he sponsored SB 107, making California the first state to establish a safe haven for medical treatment and surgery for transgender minors. Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed the bill into law in September.
In March, Defenders of Faith and Freedom filed a lawsuit against the Newsom administration in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of the Western District of California.
Parenting advocates and experts have criticized Weiner’s amendment, which repeals California’s Family Code.
Jay Richards, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Life, Religion and Family, called AB 957 a “grotesque violation.” (The Daily Signal is Heritage’s multimedia news organization.)
While more and more European countries are abandoning the hideous gender medicine for children, California has decided to make it mandatory. Not only do they want to make sure that any child with conflicted feelings about their sexual body gets a quick shot of crossed hormones and castration surgery, state Democrats want to target otherwise hesitant parents. This is a grotesque violation of the rights of children and parents. Decent Californians left, right and center should be outraged.
Nicole Pearson, founder of the Facts Law Truth Justice and civil rights group, denounced the unconstitutionality of AB 957 in an interview with The Daily Signal:
This bill makes it law that failure to verify your child’s identity is child abuse. This will be the final legal decision without any supporting evidence or hearing with notice or opportunity to be heard. Rep. Wilson and Sen. Scott Weiner are not doctors. They can’t make that determination for every child age 0-17 in the state, but that’s what they’re trying to do here.
If a parent or guardian is against or simply unwilling to acknowledge their 7-year-old’s new identity—as he transitions from SpongeBob SquarePants to Batman and Dora the Explorer—then they can be found guilty of child abuse and maltreatment under the AB- 957, if it becomes law.
This horrific bill for children and their parents and guardians, not just in California, but across the country. Gavin Newsom is running for president in 2028. If he signs this into law here, it will be sent to every state if he becomes president.
A state senate hearing on AB 957 is scheduled for June 13 at 1:30 pm PT.
Translation: ES
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
#California #bill #charge #parent #doesnt #support #chemical #castration #children #child #abuse
