On October 18 and 19, the day after the horrific announcement of the murder of little Lola, 12, Cyril Hanouna had asked for a “immediate process “ and the “right life”without “right to defense“, and without “to be treated”for the alleged killer, Dahbia B. A radical stance that got her into trouble.
Not everyone agrees with Hanover
After the attacks of Sophia Aram, who called him to “barbarian of the worst kind“, the team of C to Te who judged it to be a “parasite“, “monstrous”, even the Minister of Justice, Eric Dupont-Moretti, jumped to the ceiling. And the public did not remain numb. TPMP viewers seized Arcom (formerly CSA) when they saw the sequence. And while the gendarme of the PAF carries out his investigation before the instruction, the Parisian Baba’s relatives asked.
>> See also: “Bravo le veau”: Sophia Aram takes on Cyril Hanouna again on the Lola affair!
And among them, not everyone agrees. Firstly there is the management of Cyril Hanouna, who are behind him 100%, in particular Vincent Pujol, the program director of C8 who ensures that they are in “permanent dialogue” and let a “enormous confidence, between them, before remembering: “Cyril is also loved by the public for his sometimes cutting points of view “. In Canal +, the parent company, we add: “the slip is the atrocious murder of Lola, not the rest”.
“Not at ease with the editorial line of the moment”
Within the columnists, however, there is a path of division. If a TPMP figure ensures “Cyril gives his opinion and is entitled to it. He is also denied live when he says what he said about the Lola affair “ and praise him for typing “Where does it hurt“while denouncing “the stillness of justice”, “another columnist prefers not to comment on the sequence“tell us our colleagues. And to add that the latter” is not at ease with the editorial line of the moment “… Will you be able to find out who is behind the anonymity?
does
