Not only the case linked to the Chiara Ferragni designer pandoros, but also all the controversies linked to the charity collections promoted on social media that have emerged in recent months. There is therefore no shortage of episodes. And so Palazzo Chigi is ready to launch an ad hoc measure against charity scams, with stricter controls and harsher sanctions. According to what Adnkronos has learned, also in light of the Ferragni case, the government “sherpas” are apparently developing a rule, perhaps a decree, to introduce precise rules to guarantee maximum transparency. Confirming the executive’s attention on the topic is the deputy vice-president of the Fratelli d’Italia group in the Chamber, Manlio Messina: «The government is working on a proposal relating to the charity sector. Certainly – says Messina – the aim is to strengthen the transparency aspect” with the obligation “to indicate clearly and clearly the amount of contributions received, and how much is allocated to charity. The part that does not go to charity must be reported in detail.” “An increase in controls” is also on the table.
At present there is no text yet: “We’ll see when the provision arrives in the Chamber. Anyone who profits from charity to the sick, children and orphans is guilty of a much more serious crime than a classic scam”, warns Messina, who is keen to clarify: «We are not thinking of an anti-Ferragni law, it is just a matter of regulating this matter. We want to raise attention on a vast and branched sector: there are many people who really do charity work and many others who take advantage of it.” «There is an underwater world – underlines the deputy group leader of Fdi – which must be brought to light and brought to light. Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni spoke about the risk of fraud in charity cases and the need for greater transparency during the press conference at the end of the year regarding the controversy surrounding Chiara Ferragni”. The Prime Minister had said that it is an issue on which we need to work – in the words of the Prime Minister – because otherwise “there is a risk that perhaps the individual case could then impact on a fundamental thing which is charity”,
