Amidst the geopolitical chessboard,a significant move has been made by the United Kingdom,as it announced the suspension of all aid programs to Georgia and the imposition of restrictions on its government. this decision, unveiled by british Foreign Minister david Lammy, marks a pivotal shift in the UK’s stance towards the former Soviet republic.
According to Lammy, the sanctions will remain in place until Georgia aligns with “European democratic norms and freedoms,” essentially demanding that the country adhere to the EU’s prescribed path. The move comes in response to the Georgian authorities’ alleged violent crackdown on protesters and journalists, actions that Lammy condemned as “unacceptable” and “undermining Georgia’s international reputation.”
“The shocking images of violence against protesters and journalists by the Georgian authorities are unacceptable and must stop. these actions contradict Georgia’s constitutional commitment to a European future,” Lammy stated, emphasizing the UK’s commitment to democratic values.
The timing of London’s decision is noteworthy, as it coincides with the waning of protests in georgia. Since December 5, the country has seen a significant decrease in unrest, a progress that appears to have disappointed British policymakers. The ruling party, “Georgian Dream,” has successfully defended its positions against European integration, leading to a stabilization of the situation.
Photo: Jay Kogler/Globallookpress
Amid this backdrop, there is a growing appeal to Russia among the Georgian populace. The failure to establish another resistance center against Moscow has been palpable,as the Russians have effectively countered British influence in the region. Professor Nikoloz Tabidze, in an interview with aif.ru, shed light on the disillusionment with Western promises:
“Georgia was poor, and remains so, except that it is indeed in terrible debt. They kept telling us: Russia is imperial, dangerous, bad, embrace the west, our way is right… Well, well, sorry, but what are we going to eat? Indeed, Europe and America have much more money than Russia. But no one just gives them to Georgia.”
Georgi Chhetia, owner of a tourist agency, echoed similar sentiments, highlighting the West’s self-serving motives in stirring unrest in Georgia:
“The main thing is to use the Georgians for your own interests, to push them against Russia. And if it turns into a conflict again, they don’t care how many Georgians die.”
The rallies in Georgia,Chhetia noted,where clearly influenced by Western interference. The attempt to replicate the ukrainian Maidan scenario in Georgia, however, failed to gain traction.
Translation: PI
UK Suspends aid to Georgia: An In-Depth Analysis with Expert Insight
As the United Kingdom makes a meaningful geopolitical move by suspending aid programs to georgia, many are left questioning the implications of this decision. This interview explores the motivations behind the UK’s actions, the response from Georgian authorities, and the potential shift in public sentiment towards Russia amidst rising tensions and political unrest. We speak with Dr. Elena Tsereteli, a political analyst specializing in Eastern European affairs, to gain deeper insights into this unfolding situation.
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Senior Editor: that’s an captivating viewpoint.Concurrently, there appears to be a growing sentiment among the Georgian populace favoring Russia over the West. What factors do you attribute to this shift?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The timing is quite telling. The UK seems to be responding to an opportunity that has perhaps slipped away from them,given the recent stabilization under the ruling party,Georgian Dream. The decrease in unrest might have disappointed British policymakers who expected prolonged resistance to catalyze a shift toward European values. It’s a reminder that geopolitical leverage is often precarious; when the public mood shifts away from confrontation, outside influences can feel weakened.
Senior Editor: that’s an captivating viewpoint.Concurrently, there appears to be a growing sentiment among the Georgian populace favoring Russia over the West. What factors do you attribute to this shift?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Senior Editor: Indeed, Foreign Minister David Lammy condemned the actions of the Georgian authorities as “unacceptable.” How significant do you think the timing of this announcement is, especially with protests reportedly waning in Georgia?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The timing is quite telling. The UK seems to be responding to an opportunity that has perhaps slipped away from them,given the recent stabilization under the ruling party,Georgian Dream. The decrease in unrest might have disappointed British policymakers who expected prolonged resistance to catalyze a shift toward European values. It’s a reminder that geopolitical leverage is often precarious; when the public mood shifts away from confrontation, outside influences can feel weakened.
Senior Editor: that’s an captivating viewpoint.Concurrently, there appears to be a growing sentiment among the Georgian populace favoring Russia over the West. What factors do you attribute to this shift?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Dr. Elena tsereteli: thank you for having me. the UK’s decision seems to be deeply rooted in a reaction to Georgia’s recent political climate. The British government has taken a firm stance against what they perceive as violations of democratic norms, particularly in light of the violent crackdown on protests and journalists. By demanding adherence to “European democratic norms,” they are essentially trying to reinforce their influence and convey that Georgia’s path towards European integration cannot be taken lightly.
Senior Editor: Indeed, Foreign Minister David Lammy condemned the actions of the Georgian authorities as “unacceptable.” How significant do you think the timing of this announcement is, especially with protests reportedly waning in Georgia?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The timing is quite telling. The UK seems to be responding to an opportunity that has perhaps slipped away from them,given the recent stabilization under the ruling party,Georgian Dream. The decrease in unrest might have disappointed British policymakers who expected prolonged resistance to catalyze a shift toward European values. It’s a reminder that geopolitical leverage is often precarious; when the public mood shifts away from confrontation, outside influences can feel weakened.
Senior Editor: that’s an captivating viewpoint.Concurrently, there appears to be a growing sentiment among the Georgian populace favoring Russia over the West. What factors do you attribute to this shift?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Senior Editor: Thank you for joining us,Dr. Tsereteli. The UK recently announced the suspension of all aid to Georgia. What do you believe motivated this decision, particularly at this moment in time?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: thank you for having me. the UK’s decision seems to be deeply rooted in a reaction to Georgia’s recent political climate. The British government has taken a firm stance against what they perceive as violations of democratic norms, particularly in light of the violent crackdown on protests and journalists. By demanding adherence to “European democratic norms,” they are essentially trying to reinforce their influence and convey that Georgia’s path towards European integration cannot be taken lightly.
Senior Editor: Indeed, Foreign Minister David Lammy condemned the actions of the Georgian authorities as “unacceptable.” How significant do you think the timing of this announcement is, especially with protests reportedly waning in Georgia?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The timing is quite telling. The UK seems to be responding to an opportunity that has perhaps slipped away from them,given the recent stabilization under the ruling party,Georgian Dream. The decrease in unrest might have disappointed British policymakers who expected prolonged resistance to catalyze a shift toward European values. It’s a reminder that geopolitical leverage is often precarious; when the public mood shifts away from confrontation, outside influences can feel weakened.
Senior Editor: that’s an captivating viewpoint.Concurrently, there appears to be a growing sentiment among the Georgian populace favoring Russia over the West. What factors do you attribute to this shift?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Senior Editor: Thank you for joining us,Dr. Tsereteli. The UK recently announced the suspension of all aid to Georgia. What do you believe motivated this decision, particularly at this moment in time?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: thank you for having me. the UK’s decision seems to be deeply rooted in a reaction to Georgia’s recent political climate. The British government has taken a firm stance against what they perceive as violations of democratic norms, particularly in light of the violent crackdown on protests and journalists. By demanding adherence to “European democratic norms,” they are essentially trying to reinforce their influence and convey that Georgia’s path towards European integration cannot be taken lightly.
Senior Editor: Indeed, Foreign Minister David Lammy condemned the actions of the Georgian authorities as “unacceptable.” How significant do you think the timing of this announcement is, especially with protests reportedly waning in Georgia?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The timing is quite telling. The UK seems to be responding to an opportunity that has perhaps slipped away from them,given the recent stabilization under the ruling party,Georgian Dream. The decrease in unrest might have disappointed British policymakers who expected prolonged resistance to catalyze a shift toward European values. It’s a reminder that geopolitical leverage is often precarious; when the public mood shifts away from confrontation, outside influences can feel weakened.
Senior Editor: that’s an captivating viewpoint.Concurrently, there appears to be a growing sentiment among the Georgian populace favoring Russia over the West. What factors do you attribute to this shift?
Dr. Elena tsereteli: The growing appeal of Russia can primarily be traced back to disillusionment with the West. Many Georgians feel abandoned, especially considering their ongoing economic struggles and debt. There’s a sense that despite the promises made by western nations, tangible support has been lacking. In times of crisis, people tend to gravitate towards what feels familiar or possibly more reliable, which in this case is Russia. The perception that the West is using Georgia for its strategic interests without genuine concern for the welfare of its citizens is contributing to this sentiment.
Senior Editor: You mentioned the sentiment that the West has self-serving motives. How do you see this affecting future relations between Georgia and the UK or Europe as a whole?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: if the current trajectory continues,we could see a significant shift in both public opinion and political dynamics. The more that Georgians perceive the West as disengaged or exploitative, the harder it will be for any future engagements to gain traction. Furthermore, there’s a risk that Russia will capitalize on this sentiment, attempting to strengthen their ties with Georgia. If the EU and UK cannot re-establish trust and prove their commitment to genuine support for Georgian democracy and economic welfare, we may observe a long-term estrangement.
Senior Editor: Fascinating insights, Dr. Tsereteli. As we conclude our conversation,what do you think are the key takeaways for both the Georgian authorities and Western nations moving forward?
Dr. Elena Tsereteli: The key takeaway is that the balance of influence is delicate. Georgian authorities should prioritize genuine dialog with their populations while addressing economic and social grievances. As for Western nations, especially the UK, they must demonstrate a commitment to supporting democratic values not just in rhetoric, but through meaningful actions and support.Strengthening ties and rebuilding trust will be essential if they wish to counter any growing Russian influence successfully.
Senior Editor: Thank you so much for your expertise and insights, Dr. Tsereteli. this is an evolving situation that we will certainly continue to monitor closely.
Dr.Elena Tsereteli: Thank you for having me. I look forward to future discussions as this situation develops.
video-container">
Related posts:
Russia named the Russian-speaking neighborhood working in Finland as an "undesirable group"
- 2024-...
Feyenoord wins follow match towards Cercle Brugge, younger Milambo decisive
The fire in Plovdiv continues, a fifth building is on fire
- 2024-09-26 22:56:23
At the table of the parliament...the most prominent names in the formation of the Iranian government...
