In the Torbalı district of Izmir, a decision was made in the case of the murder of the businessman Cihat Murat Öğüt, where the victim’s wife and two sons and one of their friends were tried.
Batuhan Ata and Mehmet Hadi Öğüt, the children of the deceased prisoners, and Öznur Öğüt, C.G, the companions and the lawyers of the victim, attended the hearing at the İzmir 4th High Criminal Court. The lawyer of the deceased’s mother and older sister stated that they thought the defendants had designed the situation and claimed that unjust provocation did not occur in the incident.
‘WHAT WAS HIS PUPPY TO YES?’
Hatice Öğüt, the mother of the deceased, stated that he referred the defendants to Allah, saying, “I want them to be punished. I am the mother. My heart stops here every time. said.
‘MY AND MY MOTHER’S LIFE IS OVER’
The sister of the victim, Fatma Bahar Narin, said that she complained about the defendants and said, “My and my mother’s life is over. If she was vacant, she did not kill. If they called an ambulance. Let me explain this.
‘BATUHAN’S MOVEMENT IS PROPORTIONAL’
The lawyer of the defendant Batuhan Ata Öğüt claimed on the day of the incident that the victim was attacking heavily on his wife Öznur, saying, “Batuhan’s action is proportional. He wanted to prevent his father who attacked his mother heavily. There was a struggle between the defendant and the victim. The incident was the use of the right to defend.” “His mother was dying a little more. He should have responded. There is no evidence that Batuhan exceeded the proportion and his intent was to kill.”
–
SAYED TO BE SORRY AND REGRETED
Batuhan Ata Öğüt stated that he was very sad and regret that he could not sleep at night after the incident and that his family came to the point of disintegration. The defendant Mehmet Hadi Öğüt argued that all his actions were to protect his brother Batuhan and that he did not kill anyone.
–
–
‘IF THERE IS LIFE, IT IS MY CHILDREN’
Defendant Öznur Öğüt said, “I wish my children would not be here if I died that day. His family knows what I was suffering. My children are not murderers. If there is life ending, it is the life of me and my children.” Detained defendant C.G. demanded his acquittal, arguing that it would not be possible to black out evidence because he did not commit a crime.
UNAUTHORIZED DRIVE DISCOUNT FROM THE COURT
In the decision he announced after the break, the court board decided that Batuhan Ata Öğüt, the detained defendant, should be sentenced to “life crime of intentional killing” with the aggravated life imprisonment, and the sentence was reduced to 22 years on the grounds that he committed the incident under unjust provocation.
–
–
Penalties received by other defendants
The delegation ordered the detained defendant Mehmet Hadi Öğüt to be sentenced to 4 years and 6 months in prison for “destroying, hiding or changing crime evidence”. The court ordered Öznur Öğüt to be sentenced to 3 years in prison for “destroying, hiding or changing crime evidence”, and 4 years in prison for the defendant accused C.G.
–
–
THE JOB HUMAN HAS BEEN IN THE BURNED JELL
The body of business man Cihat Murat Öğüt (46) was found in the burning jeep on April 15 last year in Torbalı district of İzmir. Öznur Öğüt (45), their son Batuhan Ata Öğüt (19) and Mehmet Hadi Öğüt (24) and their friend C.G. (37) was arrested. C. G. and Öznur Öğüt was later released.
In the indictment prepared by the İzmir Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, Öznur was aggravated by his sons Batuhan Ata and Mehmet Hadi Öğüt on charges of “killing a close relative by designing”, and C.G was sentenced to 5 years in prison for “destroying, hiding or changing crime evidence”.
–
