Home » Entertainment » Boycott Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming! Qiong Yao, the screenwriters of “Wolf Warrior”, “Thailand”, “Ode to Joy” and other 111 people jointly published articles. What did they do? _ Oriental Fortune Network

Boycott Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming! Qiong Yao, the screenwriters of “Wolf Warrior”, “Thailand”, “Ode to Joy” and other 111 people jointly published articles. What did they do? _ Oriental Fortune Network

Original title: Boycott Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming! Qiong Yao, the screenwriters of “Wolf Warrior”, “Thailand” and “Ode to Joy” and other 111 people jointly published articles. What exactly did they do?

On the evening of December 21, Song Fangjin, Yu Fei and others issued a joint letter from 111 screenwriters, directors, producers, and writers. The letter pointed out:Related practitioners oppose plagiarismbehaviorYu Zheng and Guo Jingming frequently appear in variety shows for topical hype to gainRatingsAnd click-through rate, Calling for not to provide a stage for plagiarism. Also co-signed by Qiong Yao, Gao Qunshu, Bai Yicong, and Dong Runnian.

Why did Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming provoke public anger?

  Joint boycott from insiders

On the evening of the 21st, 111 film and television screenwriters, directors, producers and writers including Qiong Yao, Gao Qunshu, Shu Huan, Wang Xiaoping and Zhao Dongling jointly issued a signed open letter to the industry andsocietyMake a strong appeal:Plagiarists should not be role models and publicly boycott Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming as instructors of acting variety shows, Criticized the recently broadcasted programs such as “The Actor, Please Take Your Place”, “I Am an Actor 2” for chasing clicks, ratings, and gaining the audience’s attention using screenwriters and directors with plagiarism.

The open letter stated that recently, in the variety shows of some online platforms and TV stations, screenwriters and directors (Yu Zheng, Guo Jingming) with plagiarism and bad traces have appeared as program mentors and guests, and they have made topical hype inside and outside the show to chase clicks. Rates, ratings, blogs.

In particular, Guo Jingming and Yu Zheng refused to implement the court’s apology after the court’s judgment, and did not make any review of their illegal behavior. Such people are touted as mentors on online platforms and TV stations, allowing them to sell “Success Studies”. It has caused a very bad influence in society and has set a very bad example for young people.

The open letter solemnly appeals to immediately stop the publicity and hype of these “bad practitioners” and make changes and adjustments to related programs.The open letter also emphasizes: severely crack down on and punish screenwriters and directors who have illegal acts of plagiarism, media platforms should promote the righteousness of the times, promote artists who are both moral and artistic, and actively reject these inferior and unrepentant creators and refrain from plagiarism. Plagiarists provide a stage to remove them frompublicExpelled from the media.

As of press time, Guo Jingming and Yu Zheng have not yet responded to this.

The following is the original text of the open letter:

image

image

  Why are Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming involved in “plagiarism”

There have been several sensational plagiarism incidents in the film and television industry in recent years.

On April 15, 2014, Qiong YaoWeiboIn an open letter published to the then State Administration of Radio, Film and Television, it reported that Yu Zheng’s “Gong Suo Liancheng” had plagiarized from “Mei Hua Lao” in many plots, and listed several of Yu Zheng’s plagiarism.CaseAs evidence, she urged the leaders of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television to immediately stop broadcasting the new drama “Gong 3”, and urged the audience not to watch the drama.

image

On April 28, 2015, Qiong Yao formally sued Yu Zheng for infringement, and at the same time investigated the broadcasting unit-Hunan Satellite TV.responsibility. On December 25, the Beijing Third Intermediate People’s Court pronounced the case.The court ruled that “The Chains of the Palace” infringed the “Plum Blossom”Adaptation rights, Yu Zheng was asked to publicly apologize to Qiong Yao, and the five defendants paid a total of 5 million yuan.

Yu Zheng subsequently filed an appeal. The Beijing Higher People’s Court made a judgment after the second instance: the appeal was rejected and the original judgment was upheld.

But Yu Zheng refused to publicly apologize to Qiong Yao, and disappeared after playing. The phone was blocked and the email returned. As of April 2018, according to the official WeChat account of Beijing Courts website “Beijing Law Net Affairs”,Because Yu Zheng (Yu Zheng) refused to fulfill the obligation of “a public apology to Chen Zhe (Qiong Yao) and eliminate the impact” in the court judgment, Chen Zhe applied for enforcement according to law.The Beijing Third Intermediate Court enforced the case on April 26, 2018, and published the main content of the judgment in the “Legal System Daily”, and the required expenses were borne by the remaining charge.

image

Let’s look at the sensational “China’s No. 1 Copyright Case” in 2003-the plagiarism case of Zhuang Yu against Guo Jingming. In 2003, the up-and-coming young writer Guo Jingming became popular with his book “How Many Flowers and Falling in a Dream”, Guo Jingming is from Sichuan, but in his “How Many Flowers and Falling in a Dream”, the protagonist is all a Beijing film.

In December 2003, Zhuang Yu claimed that the book “Knowing How Many Flowers and Falling in Dreams” had plagiarized his “Circle Inside and Outside”. The case has not yet started, which caused an uproar.

A year later, in December 2004, Guo Jingming lost the first instance and immediately appealed. At the same time, he stated that he had never had any out-of-court contact with Zhuang Yu, and he did not consider reconciliation. On May 22, 2006, the Beijing Higher People’s Court made a final judgment and rejected Guo Jingming’s appeal.The verdict that Guo Jingming and the publisher pay Zhuang Yu 200,000 yuan for economic losses and 10,000 yuan for spiritual comfortAt the same time, Chunfeng Literature and Art Publishing House and Beijing Book Building were also sentenced to stop publishing,Sales“How much do you know about the flowers in your dreams”. The final judgment also requires Guo Jingming and the publishing house to apologize publicly in the “China Youth Daily” within 15 days.

But Guo Jingming also refused to apologize. Later, the court had to enforce enforcement.

image

In 2019 and 2020, Guo Jingming has become a mentor of the hit variety show “Actors Please Take Your Place”, and Yu Zheng has become a mentor of the variety show “I Am an Actor”.

image

image

The Daily Economic News earlier this yearstatisticsSince 2014, nearly 15 popular film and television dramas have sparked the dispute of “plagiarism”. “Zhen Huan”, “Langya Bang”, “Flower Thousand Bone”, “Splendid Weiyang”, “Sansheng III Shili Peach Blossom”, “Chu Qiao Chuan”, etc., have all been caught in the suspected plagiarism infringement of the original works.

In 2019, 60 screenwriters raised funds to help network writers in the class-action “Splendid Weiyang” Zhou Jing case. The court awarded 604,000 yuan in compensation and a public apology.

Very few people can be sentenced to compensation for plagiarism like “Splendid Weiyang”. On the one hand, with the rapid development of online literature, the homogeneity of works is serious. Many works of the same type are very similar in story routines and plots. This makes it very difficult to define many “plagiarism”, and the process of definition is very complicated and costly. Time and effort.

At that time, Yu Fei, a veteran in the field of plagiarism identification, said bluntly: “I have long been discouraged. Plagiarism identification not only requires a lot of time and energy, but the key is to be misunderstood, blamed, and criticized. There are very few people who act, and even the original sins of plagiarism, Yu Zheng and Guo Jingming, have not been solved. What’s more, no one really cares about this chaos in the industry. The’anti-plagiarism’ industry is basically dead. Up.”

(Source: Daily Economic News)

(Editor in charge: DF398)

Solemnly declare: The purpose of this information released by Oriental Fortune.com is to spread more information and has nothing to do with this stand.

.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.