BOLOGNA – “We firmly condemn violence, regardless of its origin. However, we consider unacceptable what we have been able to observe in some images which show one of the leaders of far-right movements giving orders to officials responsible for public order”. The secretariat’s complaint national team of the Silp Cgil arrives when the controversy is more bloody than ever. And it is written in black and white, in the widespread note, that there was someone from Casapound or the Patriots Network who “gave” during the neo-fascist march. orders to public officials”.
A very serious fact that the policemen’s union stigmatises, adding that those who decided to allow the neo-fascist demonstration “did not take into account the delicate context in which the demonstrations took place and created the conditions for the intensification of clashes and tensions” .
The reply from the Police Headquarters: “Normal dialogue”
Table of Contents
The Bologna police headquarters responds to the union, “categorically” denying that members of Casapound or others “have influenced the decisions adopted regarding the methods of carrying out the initiative”. The discussions that took place between the officials of the police headquarters and the promoters are part “of the normal dialogue that during each demonstration it takes place in order to guarantee its orderly and peaceful development”. “This – adds the police headquarters – when it comes to pre-announced demonstrations, is always carried out regardless of the nature of the initiative and the identity of its organizers. And in this case the discussions certainly had a positive outcome since the demonstration had a shorter duration and ended before arriving in Piazza XX Settembre, where, according to notice, it should have ended”.
to the controversy
Clashes in Bologna, Lepore in Meloni: “You sent us 300 black shirts. Piantedosi must respond on public order”
by Silvia Bignami
The union: “Solidarity with policemen”
The national secretariat of the union reminds us that public safety must be ensured “without infiltration or external pressure from any group or political movement”. The union appeals to the unity of the police forces, “who should never even be pulled by the jacket”.
And again, the Silp CGIL expresses “its solidarity with the policemen and women who were involved in the serious incidents that occurred in Bologna, on the occasion of the demonstration of neo-fascist movements, far right and antagonistic groups”. And he recalls how “these unacceptable events unfortunately lead to situations already known, where workers in uniform often find themselves having to face the consequences of social tensions and public clashes, without being adequately protected and respected”.
The case
Casapound parades in Bologna, police-antagonists clashes. Meloni: left accomplice
by Giuseppe Baldessarro
The CGIL policemen attack by recalling that the agents “are not cannon fodder”, and underline how “the concession of demonstration spaces to movements with strong fascist connotations, especially in symbolic places such as Piazza XX Settembre in Bologna, which recalls some of the most serious episodes of neo-fascist violence in Italian history, appears not only inappropriate, but also irresponsible”.
#Clashes #Bologna #SilpCgil #leader #gave #orders #public #officials
–
## interview with a Policing Expert on the Bologna Neo-fascist Presentation Controversy
**World-Today-news Exclusive**
**Bologna, Italy:** Tensions are simmering in Bologna following a controversial neo-fascist demonstration that sparked clashes and accusations of undue influence on law enforcement officials. To shed light on this developing story, we spoke with Dr. Marco Rossi, a renowned expert in policing strategies and crowd management, professor at the University of Bologna’s Department of Sociology.
**WTN:** Dr. Rossi, can you assess the situation surrounding the recent neo-fascist march in Bologna, notably concerning allegations that organizers may have exerted undue influence on police?
**Dr. Rossi:** this is a complex situation with several layers. While it is crucial to condemn violence from all sides,the allegations of external influence on police actions raise serious concerns about the integrity of public order management. Allowing any group, nonetheless of their ideology, to dictate police tactics sets a perilous precedent.
**WTN:** The police headquarters refuted these claims, stating that discussions with organizers were part of “normal dialog” to ensure a peaceful demonstration. what is your take on this?
**Dr. Rossi:** While open communication between police and organizers is important for managing large gatherings, it is crucial to maintain a clear boundary.The police’s primary duty is to uphold the law and ensure public safety, not to negotiate strategies based on the demands of a specific group. The perception, even if unfounded, of preferential treatment can erode public trust and fuel further conflict.
**WTN:** What are the potential consequences of such accusations, regardless of their veracity?
**Dr. Rossi:** This situation can deeply damage the public’s faith in law enforcement. It fuels the perception of bias and potentially creates a climate of fear and distrust. It can also embolden extremist groups, leading to more confrontations and potentially escalating violence.
**WTN:** What steps can be taken to prevent such situations in the future?
**Dr. Rossi:**
Clearly defined protocols for handling demonstrations, particularly those involving groups with extremist views, are essential. These protocols should prioritize public safety while guaranteeing impartial application of the law.
Furthermore,building trust between police and communities through openness and open communication can help foster a more collaborative environment.
autonomous oversight mechanisms can ensure accountability and investigate any claims of undue influence,safeguarding the integrity of law enforcement agencies.
**WTN:** thank you for your insights, Dr. Rossi. This situation underscores the delicate balance between guaranteeing freedom of assembly and maintaining public order.
**Dr. Rossi:** It is indeed a crucial balance, and one that requires careful consideration and constant vigilance. Transparent and accountable policing is vital for a healthy democracy.
