BOLOGNA – “We firmly condemn violence, regardless of its origin. However, we consider unacceptable what we have been able to observe in some images which show one of the leaders of far-right movements giving orders to officials responsible for public order”. The secretariat’s complaint national team of the Silp Cgil arrives when the controversy is more bloody than ever. And it is written in black and white, in the widespread note, that there was someone from Casapound or the Patriots Network who “gave” during the neo-fascist march. orders to public officials”.
A very serious fact that the policemen’s union stigmatises, adding that those who decided to allow the neo-fascist demonstration “did not take into account the delicate context in which the demonstrations took place and created the conditions for the intensification of clashes and tensions” .
The reply from the Police Headquarters: “Normal dialogue”
Table of Contents
The Bologna police headquarters responds to the union, “categorically” denying that members of Casapound or others “have influenced the decisions adopted regarding the methods of carrying out the initiative”. The discussions that took place between the officials of the police headquarters and the promoters are part “of the normal dialogue that during each demonstration it takes place in order to guarantee its orderly and peaceful development”. “This – adds the police headquarters – when it comes to pre-announced demonstrations, is always carried out regardless of the nature of the initiative and the identity of its organizers. And in this case the discussions certainly had a positive outcome since the demonstration had a shorter duration and ended before arriving in Piazza XX Settembre, where, according to notice, it should have ended”.
to the controversy
Clashes in Bologna, Lepore in Meloni: “You sent us 300 black shirts. Piantedosi must respond on public order”
by Silvia Bignami
The union: “Solidarity with policemen”
The national secretariat of the union reminds us that public safety must be ensured “without infiltration or external pressure from any group or political movement”. The union appeals to the unity of the police forces, “who should never even be pulled by the jacket”.
And again, the Silp CGIL expresses “its solidarity with the policemen and women who were involved in the serious incidents that occurred in Bologna, on the occasion of the demonstration of neo-fascist movements, far right and antagonistic groups”. And he recalls how “these unacceptable events unfortunately lead to situations already known, where workers in uniform often find themselves having to face the consequences of social tensions and public clashes, without being adequately protected and respected”.
The case
Casapound parades in Bologna, police-antagonists clashes. Meloni: left accomplice
by Giuseppe Baldessarro
The CGIL policemen attack by recalling that the agents “are not cannon fodder”, and underline how “the concession of demonstration spaces to movements with strong fascist connotations, especially in symbolic places such as Piazza XX Settembre in Bologna, which recalls some of the most serious episodes of neo-fascist violence in Italian history, appears not only inappropriate, but also irresponsible”.
#Clashes #Bologna #SilpCgil #leader #gave #orders #public #officials
–
## World Today News Expert Interview
**Expert:** Professor Alberto Bianchi, Historian specializing in Italian political movements
**Topic:** Controversy surrounding Neo-fascist march in Bologna
**Interviewer:** Sarah Jones (WTN Staff)
**Sarah Jones:** Professor Bianchi, yesterday saw significant controversy surrounding a neo-fascist march in Bologna, with accusations from the police union Silp Cgil that members of far-right groups were giving orders to law enforcement officials. What’s your take on these allegations?
**Professor Bianchi:** These are extremely serious allegations,Ms. Jones,and they raise essential questions about the impartiality of law enforcement agencies. If members of extremist groups were indeed influencing police decisions during a presentation, it would represent a dangerous blurring of lines between political actors and those tasked with maintaining public order. It would also raise concerns about potential bias in policing practices.
**Sarah Jones:** The Bologna police headquarters categorically denies these claims,stating that discussions with the organizers were part of “normal dialogue.” How would you assess this response?
**Professor Bianchi:** Disclaimer, I incentivize open dialogue but I also respect those with dissenting opinions. The police statement, while understandable in its attempt to maintain professionalism, seems somewhat dismissive.It’s crucial to emphasize openness and accountability in such situations. An self-reliant inquiry into the events surrounding the march, including the nature of interactions between police officials and the organizers, would be essential to address these concerns and restore public trust.
**sarah Jones:** this incident comes amidst a broader national debate on the rise of far-right ideology. How does this incident fit into that larger context?
**Professor Bianchi:** This incident serves as a stark reminder of the challenges posed by the resurgence of far-right groups in Italy. Their attempts to exert influence not only in political spheres but also within institutions vital to upholding democratic values like law enforcement are deeply concerning.
**Sarah Jones:**
What message does this send to the Italian public about the state of public safety and the rule of law?
**Professor Bianchi:**
This incident undoubtedly casts a shadow of doubt on the impartiality and effectiveness of law enforcement in dealing with perhaps volatile situations. It underscores the urgent need for continued vigilance against extremist ideologies and for robust mechanisms to ensure that all citizens are treated equally under the law, nonetheless of their political beliefs.
**Sarah Jones:** Thank you, Professor Bianchi, for sharing your insights on this crucial issue.
**Professor Bianchi:** It is a debatable and urgent topic,my pleasure.