BOLOGNA – “We firmly condemn violence, regardless of its origin. However, we consider unacceptable what we have been able to observe in some images which show one of the leaders of far-right movements giving orders to officials responsible for public order”. The secretariat’s complaint national team of the Silp Cgil arrives when the controversy is more bloody than ever. And it is written in black and white, in the widespread note, that there was someone from Casapound or the Patriots Network who “gave” during the neo-fascist march. orders to public officials”.
A very serious fact that the policemen’s union stigmatises, adding that those who decided to allow the neo-fascist demonstration “did not take into account the delicate context in which the demonstrations took place and created the conditions for the intensification of clashes and tensions” .
The reply from the Police Headquarters: “Normal dialogue”
Table of Contents
The Bologna police headquarters responds to the union, “categorically” denying that members of Casapound or others “have influenced the decisions adopted regarding the methods of carrying out the initiative”. The discussions that took place between the officials of the police headquarters and the promoters are part “of the normal dialogue that during each demonstration it takes place in order to guarantee its orderly and peaceful development”. “This – adds the police headquarters – when it comes to pre-announced demonstrations, is always carried out regardless of the nature of the initiative and the identity of its organizers. And in this case the discussions certainly had a positive outcome since the demonstration had a shorter duration and ended before arriving in Piazza XX Settembre, where, according to notice, it should have ended”.
to the controversy
Clashes in Bologna, Lepore in Meloni: “You sent us 300 black shirts. Piantedosi must respond on public order”
by Silvia Bignami
The union: “Solidarity with policemen”
The national secretariat of the union reminds us that public safety must be ensured “without infiltration or external pressure from any group or political movement”. The union appeals to the unity of the police forces, “who should never even be pulled by the jacket”.
And again, the Silp CGIL expresses “its solidarity with the policemen and women who were involved in the serious incidents that occurred in Bologna, on the occasion of the demonstration of neo-fascist movements, far right and antagonistic groups”. And he recalls how “these unacceptable events unfortunately lead to situations already known, where workers in uniform often find themselves having to face the consequences of social tensions and public clashes, without being adequately protected and respected”.
The case
Casapound parades in Bologna, police-antagonists clashes. Meloni: left accomplice
by Giuseppe Baldessarro
The CGIL policemen attack by recalling that the agents “are not cannon fodder”, and underline how “the concession of demonstration spaces to movements with strong fascist connotations, especially in symbolic places such as Piazza XX Settembre in Bologna, which recalls some of the most serious episodes of neo-fascist violence in Italian history, appears not only inappropriate, but also irresponsible”.
#Clashes #Bologna #SilpCgil #leader #gave #orders #public #officials
–
## Expert Interview: Neo-Fascist March Controversy in Bologna
**November 11th, 2024**
Following the recent neo-fascist march in Bologna, culminating in clashes and raising serious concerns about the role of police and organizers, World-Today-News.com interviewed Dr. Marco Rossi, a renowned criminologist and expert on far-right movements in Italy.
**World-Today-News:** Dr. Rossi, thanks for joining us. Images from the march show individuals affiliated with far-right groups seemingly giving orders to police officers. The police union has strongly condemned this, while authorities deny any undue influence. What is your perspective on this situation?
**Dr. rossi:** This incident is deeply concerning and requires a thorough investigation. While official statements deny any inappropriate influence, the perception of far-right groups dictating terms to law enforcement is highly damaging to public trust.It feeds existing anxieties about the normalization of extremist ideologies and raises questions about the impartiality of those responsible for maintaining public order.
**World-Today-News:** The police argue that the discussions observed were merely standard pre-demonstration dialog ensuring a peaceful event. Do you find this explanation convincing?
**Dr. Rossi:** In principle, pre-demonstration dialogue between organizers and authorities is necessary for public safety.However, the context of this specific event—the presence of known neo-fascist leaders—raises red flags.
The optics are crucial here. Whether or not explicit orders were given, the appearance of far-right figures seemingly directing police actions creates a chilling effect on freedom of assembly and fosters a perception of impunity among extremist groups.
**World-Today-News:** What are the potential consequences of this situation?
**Dr. Rossi:** If left unaddressed, this incident could embolden far-right movements, leading to further escalation and contributing to a climate of fear and division within society. it could also erode public confidence in law enforcement and undermine the rule of law.
**World-Today-News:** What steps should be taken to address thes concerns?
**Dr. Rossi:** A clear and autonomous investigation into the events surrounding this march is paramount.
This investigation should examine the communication between authorities and organizers, the decision-making process regarding the march route, and the role of individuals identified as affiliated with far-right groups.
Furthermore, clear guidelines and protocols need to be established for interacting with extremist groups, ensuring that public order is maintained while upholding the principles of equality and non-discrimination.
**World-Today-News:** Dr. Rossi, thank you for your insights.
**
***
On a final note,Dr. Rossi emphasized the importance of condemning all forms of violence and extremism while defending the fundamental right to peaceful assembly. He urged for a collective commitment to safeguarding democratic values and fostering an inclusive society free from fear and hate.
