The first amendments arrive against taxes on Bitcoin and crypto at 42%.
UPDATE: the amendments proposed by the League would include the first a reduction to 28%, the other the removal of the €2,000 threshold. Both will not make crypto holders very happy.
The first amendments to the proposal contained in the Budget Law to bring taxation to 42% are Bitcoin e crypto. A proposal that practically nobody liked since its formulation and that found no public defender, except in the head of the MEF Giorgetti, who however seems to have done so more out of circumstance and obligation to defend the government’s acts than for any reason. firm conviction.
The amendment signed by the Hon. arrives. Giulio Centemero, Lega, who has already appeared several times on the Criptocurrency.it pagesjust as one comes from Coppo Of Brothers of Italy. This at least according to what was reported by AGI.
Can we succeed? What kind of regime will we face by 2025? It will be better to abandon one’s native lands to take refuge elsewhere even in the face of gain modest indeed? For now it seems not, although it is probably more correct to wait until there is something more concrete.
Budget law: the first amendments arrive
There are two amendmentsone signed by A hundred and which should collect the opinions of the Lega and one instead is signed by CoppoBrothers of Italy, which contains perhaps the most interesting proposals.
In addition to reporting taxation to 26%there would be a smarter way to cover those 16 million euros that the technical report expects from the new taxation on Bitcoin and crypto. That is, it could be reopened to a sort of amnesty, to a declaration by the person declared in the past in exchange for a payment of 16%, which would contribute, given also the important gains of Bitcoin in recent weeks, to having a drunk wife and a full cake.
At least from an initial survey, it would not appear that attempts to divide taxation between the two are envisaged holder long term and traderwhich however would seem to be on the table even taking into account what was stated by Giorgetti during a hearing in Parliament.
The best of the proposals for the holders could probably be the second: to remain at 26% and then give a sop to the Treasury coffers by making the latecomers they forgetful.
It remains difficult to quantify how many have changed their minds over the last few months: if they have not agreed to emerge with a 14%, why would you agree to do it with a 16%?
Will more amendments arrive?
Probably yes, even from the opposition which however said it was ready to vote on amendments proposed by the majority on the topic.
However, it would be particularly foolish to believe that we have already won. Negotiations in parliament are famous both for their duration and for the tendency to give birth to legal Frankensteins that end up ruining the lives and obligations of citizens…
