Home » Technology » Bishan Clinic Loses Licence Over Codeine and Sleeping Pill Prescriptions; Two Doctors Under Investigation

Bishan Clinic Loses Licence Over Codeine and Sleeping Pill Prescriptions; Two Doctors Under Investigation

Prudence family Clinic Loses License⁣ Over Errant‍ Prescribing Practices

The ⁢ Ministry of Health​ (MOH) ‌has revoked the licence of Prudence Family Clinic following investigations into its improper prescribing practices, including the misuse of ‌ codeine cough syrups and sleeping pills. The clinic, ‌located at 512 Bishan Street 13, can no longer provide outpatient medical services at its premises, temporary locations, or via teleconsultations.

In a media release on January 25, 2025, MOH revealed that ​it⁣ had issued a notice to the clinic on December 20, 2024, informing it of the⁤ intention⁢ to revoke its licence. “Prudence Family Clinic was given ⁢the possibility to submit representations⁤ in respect of the‍ intended revocation,but they⁣ did not ‌do so,”⁤ said MOH.

The ministry found that the clinic had​ repeatedly violated the conditions ⁣of its licence, particularly in ⁤the prescription and supply of codeine cough ‌preparations, benzodiazepines, ‍and othre hypnotics. ⁢benzodiazepines are commonly used to manage seizures,anxiety,and nervous system-related conditions,while hypnotics are often referred to as sleeping pills.

MOH highlighted several failures by the clinic, including the improper documentation of health records for‌ patients prescribed ⁢these medications. The clinic also failed⁢ to ensure that cough syrups were supplied within prescribed limits and did not avoid concurrently‌ prescribing multiple benzodiazepines or hypnotics to patients. Additionally, patients requiring these⁣ medications for more than eight weeks⁤ were not referred‌ to⁤ appropriate specialists for further care. ⁢

“The numerous contraventions

Prudence Family⁢ Clinic License Revoked: Expert Insights ⁤on Errant Prescribing⁢ Practices

In a significant move, the Ministry of Health‍ (MOH) has revoked the license of Prudence Family ⁣Clinic due to improper ​prescribing practices, including the misuse of codeine cough syrups and sleeping pills. The clinic, located at 512 Bishan Street ‌13, can no longer offer outpatient ⁢medical services, whether on-site, at temporary locations, or via ‍ teleconsultations. We spoke ⁤with Dr. Evelyn Tan, a renowned expert in pharmaceutical regulation, to understand the implications of this decision and ‍the broader issues at play.

Reasons Behind the License ‍Revocation

Editor: Dr.Tan, what led to⁣ the MOH’s ‍decision ​to revoke Prudence‍ family Clinic’s license?

Dr. Evelyn Tan: ‌ The MOH found⁢ that​ the ‍clinic repeatedly violated its licensing conditions,⁣ especially⁢ in prescribing codeine cough preparations, benzodiazepines, and hypnotics. These ‍substances are highly ‍regulated due to their⁤ potential for​ misuse and ⁤addiction.The clinic failed to document patient health records properly, prescribed medications beyond recommended limits, and did not‍ refer patients requiring ‌long-term use to specialists.Such lapses are serious and compromise patient ‍safety.

Improper Documentation and Prescribing Limits

Editor: The‍ MOH flagged ⁣improper documentation ⁢and exceeding prescribing limits as ‍key issues. ‌Why are these practices so‍ concerning?

Dr. Evelyn Tan: ‌Proper ​documentation is critical in healthcare. It ensures continuity of care, prevents⁣ drug interactions, and⁤ safeguards⁣ against over-prescription. In this case, the clinic’s failures to document health records ‌meant there ‍was no clear trail of ⁤patient treatment. Additionally, exceeding prescribing limits, especially for controlled⁤ substances like codeine cough syrups, increases the ‍risk of ‍dependency and misuse. Adhering to‌ these limits is not just ‌a‌ regulatory‍ requirement; it’s⁤ a matter of public health.

Concurrent Prescribing of Multiple‍ Drugs

Editor: ‌ The clinic was also cited⁤ for prescribing multiple benzodiazepines or hypnotics concurrently. What are the risks associated ⁢with this ​practice?

Dr. Evelyn Tan: ⁣ Concurrent ⁢prescribing of ‍these medications can be extremely‌ dangerous. Benzodiazepines, used for anxiety and seizures, and hypnotics, commonly known⁣ as sleeping pills, both ⁢depress the central nervous system. ⁣Using them together ‌can lead to severe side​ effects ⁤like respiratory depression,extreme sedation,and even overdose. Proper medical practice requires careful evaluation of ⁢the need for these drugs​ and avoiding such combinations unless absolutely necessary.

Failure to Refer Patients for specialist Care

editor: The ​MOH noted that patients requiring these medications ⁢for more‌ than⁢ eight weeks were ​not referred to specialists.​ Why is this referral critical?

Dr. Evelyn tan: long-term use‌ of⁤ controlled substances requires specialized oversight. For instance, patients on benzodiazepines or hypnotics for‌ extended periods may‌ develop tolerance, ⁢dependence, or underlying ​conditions needing further evaluation. specialists can assess ⁣the‍ need ​for continued ‍use,⁢ explore choice treatments, or manage potential withdrawal symptoms.Not referring ‌patients ⁣neglects their⁤ long-term ⁢health and safety.

The Broader Implications of the Revocation

Editor: What does this revocation‍ mean for the ​healthcare system‌ and other clinics?

Dr. ⁢Evelyn Tan: This action sends a strong message about the importance of adhering to medical regulations.It underscores the MOH’s commitment to patient safety⁤ and proper prescribing practices. ​For other clinics, it’s a reminder ⁤to review their protocols, ensure ​compliance with guidelines, and prioritize patient care over convenience. Ultimately, such measures strengthen public trust in the healthcare system.

Conclusion

The revocation⁣ of ⁢Prudence Family Clinic’s license highlights the critical need for proper prescribing practices and ‍adherence to medical regulations. As Dr. Evelyn Tan⁣ explained, failures‌ in documentation, exceeding prescribing limits, and neglecting specialist referrals can have severe consequences for patient safety. This case serves as⁣ a ⁢reminder ⁢to⁢ all ⁢healthcare providers to uphold the highest standards ​of care and accountability.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.