Table of Contents
In the future, Ukraine will also be allowed to use US ATACMS long-range missiles to attack targets in Russia. US President Joe Biden has lifted corresponding restrictions.
In the future, the Ukrainian military will also be allowed to use the weapons supplied by the USA for targets on Russian soil. This is reported by the New York Times, citing US government circles. The Reuters news agency also reported that corresponding US restrictions had been lifted.
The government in Kiev wants to carry out the first such attack in the coming days. No details were given.
The weapons will probably initially be counteracted Russian and North Korean troops defending Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region used in Russia, according to the US newspaper.
Change of course in Biden’s Ukraine policy
Biden’s decision is a change of course in US politics. It comes two months before President-elect Donald Trump takes office. He is expected to no longer support Ukraine as much as Biden did.
The permission for the Ukrainians to use long-range missiles, so-called Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS), was a reaction to Russia’s surprising decision to involve North Korean troops in the fight, according to the “New York Times” with reference to government circles. The missile system has one Range of more than 300 kilometers.
So far only short-range missiles are allowed
Biden began easing restrictions on the use of U.S. weapons on Russian soil after Russia launched a cross-border attack on Kharkiv, Ukraine’s second-largest city, in May.
To help the Ukrainians defend Kharkiv, Biden allowed them to High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)which has a range of around 80 kilometers, to be used against Russian forces directly on the border. However, at that time, Ukraine was not allowed to use the ATACMS systems.
How might the international community respond if the US’s military support for Ukraine diminishes under new leadership?
Guest 1: Hello, thank you for having me. Can you tell me more about the significance of allowing Ukraine to use US ATACMS missiles against targets in Russia?
Guest 2: Absolutely. This is a significant development in the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Can you share your thoughts on how this might change the dynamics of the war?
Guest 1: It certainly appears to be a game-changer. By permitting Ukraine to target Russian soil, we’re seeing a shift in the US’s approach to the conflict. Do you think this newfound support for Ukraine will continue once Biden leaves office?
Guest 2: That’s an interesting question. It’s unclear how President-elect Donald Trump will handle the situation, but it’s worth noting that public opinion in the US has been largely supportive of Ukraine. Additionally, Russia’s involvement of North Korean troops has also garnered international condemnation, which could put pressure on Trump to maintain at least some level of support for Ukraine. What are your thoughts on this?
Guest 1: I tend to agree. The use of North Korean troops by Russia has certainly caught the attention of the international community. However, the US has a history of prioritizing domestic issues over foreign policy, so it’s possible that support for Ukraine could wane under the new administration. Are there any specific concerns you have about the potential impact of this policy change?
Guest 2: One concern is escalation. The ATACMS missile system has a range of over 300 kilometers, which means it could potentially reach deep into Russian territory. This could lead to retaliation from Moscow and further intensify the conflict. Additionally, there’s always the risk of civilian casualties, which could damage public opinion both in Russia and internationally. What are your thoughts on the potential risks associated with this policy change?
Guest 1: Valid points. The risk of escalation is definitely a concern, and it’s important that both sides take precautions to avoid civilian harm. It will be crucial for Ukraine to use these weapons responsibly and only against military targets. Moving forward, do you think the US will continue to provide military aid to Ukraine?
Guest 2: That remains to be seen. The Biden
