Mining giants like BHP are urging the Australian government to move forward with proposed changes to environmental laws. This comes after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese halted negotiations with the Greens party last week, reportedly due to concerns about backlash from powerful mining interests in Western Australia.
In a bold statement,Geraldine Slattery,the head of BHP’s Australian operations,warned that failing to streamline mining approvals could severely damage Australia’s ability to attract global investment in clean energy. She described this as “one of the greatest industrial shifts in history.”
“This starts with streamlining permitting, making it easier to deliver major projects,” Ms. Slattery said at a Melbourne Mining Club event. “Inefficient regulation leads to project delays. Governments are figuring this out,” she added, pointing to Canada, Chile, and even the United States under former President Donald Trump as examples.
Ms. Slattery’s remarks, which also include a “blunt assessment” that Australia is struggling to attract skilled workers and that national innovation lags behind global competitors, come just over a week after Mr. Albanese abandoned negotiations with the Greens on passing Labor’s “nature-positive” reforms in the Senate.
The proposed overhaul of federal environmental approvals has faced strong opposition from key players in the mining sector and Western Australian premier Roger Cook, who personally lobbied Mr. Albanese to scrap the changes in their current form.
There has also been speculation that Mr. Albanese’s decision to halt cross-bench negotiations on the topic during last week’s legislative session deepened tensions between the prime minister and Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek.
The debate over the “nature-positive” bills could resurface if Mr. Albanese chooses to reconvene parliament in early February, as currently scheduled.
Mining Industry Pushes for Environmental Reform in Australia
Table of Contents
Mining giants BHP and Rio Tinto are throwing their weight behind a major overhaul of Australia’s environmental regulations, but they’re pushing back against a key element of the proposed reforms: the creation of an autonomous environmental protection agency (EPA).
BHP’s call for reform echoes a similar stance taken by Rio Tinto in October, when the company voiced its support for the Albanese government’s efforts to modernize the 25-year-old Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act.
A Rio Tinto spokesperson confirmed to the ABC this week that the company’s position on the reforms remains unchanged following Prime Minister anthony Albanese’s decision last week to halt Senate negotiations on the bill due to concerns about a potential backlash from Western Australian mining interests.
Rio Tinto advocates for “strong national environmental standards” that would enable regulators to effectively assess the risks associated with new mining projects and land use.
The Prime Minister shut down Senate negotiations about the bill last week over fears of a political backlash from Western Australian resources players. (ABC News: Sandy Powell)
While both mining giants support the need for a modernized regulatory system, they disagree with Labor’s proposal to establish an independent EPA watchdog. They prefer a system that maintains government oversight of decision-making,rather than delegating it to bureaucrats.
Rio Tinto emphasizes the importance of “overall ministerial accountability for approvals decisions and consideration of economic and social impacts.”
Labor requires the support of either the Coalition or the Greens and other crossbenchers to pass its reforms. Environmental groups are advocating for a strong, independent EPA.
The proposed reforms, initially triggered by the former Coalition government, stemmed from a 2020 review led by Graeme Samuel. The review found that Australia’s natural environment was in a “state of decline” and that the EPBC Act was failing to adequately protect the environment, support businesses, or serve the community.
Permitting Reform on the International Agenda
The debate over environmental permitting reform in Australia reflects a broader global trend. As countries grapple with the challenges of balancing economic growth with environmental protection,the need for efficient and effective permitting processes is becoming increasingly vital.
Australia must modernize its mining permitting process to remain competitive in the global race for critical minerals, according to a leading industry figure.
Speaking on Thursday, Minerals Council of Australia CEO Fiona Slattery emphasized the need for a more streamlined and efficient system to ensure Australia capitalizes on the burgeoning demand for minerals essential to the global energy transition.
“We must champion a more competitive Australia through our policy settings in the way we grant permits, regulate mining, and think about risk,” Ms Slattery said.
She highlighted the lengthy approval timelines currently plaguing the Australian mining sector, noting that complex projects can take over 1,000 days to be assessed and approved, according to the 2020 samuel Review.
“Time to market matters,” Ms Slattery stressed.
Ms Slattery pointed to international examples of permitting reform, citing the Biden administration’s Energy Permitting Reform Act and the Canadian government’s overhaul of its Impact Assessment Act to expedite decision-making.
She called for a risk-based permitting system in Australia that guarantees predictable processing timelines and reliable outcomes.
“In short, we must modernize our permitting system in line with the changing nature of competition,” Ms Slattery urged.
Ms Slattery underscored the crucial role Australia plays in supplying the minerals needed for the global energy transition, emphasizing that the country must adapt to a shifting global landscape.
“The global energy transition will not occur without the minerals Australia provides,” she stated.
Recognizing that Australia doesn’t possess the same natural advantages it enjoys with iron ore and coal, Ms Slattery stressed the importance of optimizing the enabling environment for mineral revelation, extraction, and development.
“We cannot change the rocks we have, but we can change the enablers and settings in their discovery, extraction and development,” she concluded.
The text you provided discusses a current event in Australian politics: the debate over proposed reforms to environmental law.
HereS a breakdown of the key points:
**Mining Giants Push for Reform:**
* Companies like BHP and Rio Tinto are urging the Australian government to move forward with changes to environmental laws, arguing that streamlined approvals are crucial for attracting investment in clean energy projects.
**Opposition to Reforms:**
* The proposed reforms, which included the creation of an independent EPA, faced strong opposition from the mining sector and Western Australian Premier Roger Cook.
* Prime Minister Anthony Albanese abandoned negotiations with the Greens on the reforms, citing concerns about backlash from mining interests.
**arguments for and Against:**
* Mining companies support modernizing regulations but oppose an independent EPA, preferring a system with government oversight.
* Environmental groups advocate for a strong, independent EPA to ensure effective environmental protection.
**global Context:**
* The debate in Australia reflects a global trend of balancing economic development with environmental protection.
* Other countries like Canada, Chile, and even the United States under former President Trump have been streamlining permitting processes.
**Uncertain Future:**
* The future of the “nature-positive” bills remains uncertain, but they could resurface in early February when parliament reconvenes.
* Labor will need support from either the Coalition or the Greens to pass the reforms.
**Overall:**
This situation highlights the complex challenges facing Australia as it seeks to balance its economic reliance on mining with the need to protect its environment. The outcome of this debate will have significant implications for both the mining industry and the future of Australia’s natural environment.
Let me know if you have any other questions about this topic!
