Home » Technology » Bethesda’s “Starry Sky” responded to negative reviews. The content was too robot-like and players didn’t buy it | ETtoday Game News | ETtodayAMP

Bethesda’s “Starry Sky” responded to negative reviews. The content was too robot-like and players didn’t buy it | ETtoday Game News | ETtodayAMP

▲ Bethesda’s “Starry Sky” responded to the negative reviews. (Picture/reproduced from Steam)

Reporter Lou Wanling/Comprehensive Report

Bethesda’s “Starfield” was officially launched in September this year. It uses the vast universe and galaxies as the stage to allow players to embark on a space adventure. The game has gone from being extremely popular when it was first released to receiving mixed reviews. Many players are not satisfied with it. There are quite a lot of opinions about the content of the game. Until recently, B Club began to respond to players’ negative reviews one by one. As a result, it was criticized as “a robot at all.”

[廣告] Please continue reading↓

Looking back at the grand launch of “Star Sky”, it exceeded 6 million players in just two days after its launch, setting a new record for Bethesda’s own games. Although “Star Sky” had a very grand start, it fell into disrepair after about two months. It has lost some players, and the number of concurrent players on Steam is already lower than that of “The Elder Scrolls 5”.

Most media generally praised the game, such as interstellar exploration, sense of scale, freedom and other factors. However, some media expressed opinions on some shortcomings in the game. For example, IGN believed that the game needs to survive the first 10 hours or so. I find it fun. In addition, there is no way for players to move between stars similar to “fast movement”. The game will still have a lot of errors in the RTX 3080 environment, and the operation process will be unstable.

Some players stayedFrequent screen readingThe content is monotonous and not interestingWaiting for relevant opinions, B’s customer service staff recently began to respond to these negative reviews. However, B’s response was so clever that it not only failed to appease players, but instead attracted more criticism.

The reason is that B’s reply seems to accept the players’ criticism, but it also uses another method to “introduce” the fun brought by the game. However, what players really want to hear is not to know what other aspects of the game are also fun. , but wanted to know whether the development team would make corrections or improvements to the problematic areas. Therefore, B’s response was also commented by many players as “it’s just a robot” and will not add points to the game at all.

[廣告] Please continue reading↓

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.