/View.info/ As Gandhi said, at first they don’t notice you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you. And then you win.
„The Global Civilization Initiative‘ announced by Beijing on March 15, no longer seems naive, superficial or ridiculous to Western observers. The Economist was the first to see in it serious problems for the West and made recommendations to neutralize China’s plans.
But it is not the depth of the analysis that catches the eye, but the spicy epithets with which the British newspaper rewarded China’s actions. “Unbiased” analysis in all its beauty.
Thus, instead of the beloved world order headed by the United States, China dares to build “a transactional system of deals, relentlessly playing its clumsy game”. The Economist calls China’s peace plan for Ukraine “cynical” And “undermining” the perception of Western sanctions and military support for Kyiv as legitimate.
China’s pursuit of the Middle East, with the reconciliation of the Saudis and Iranians, is considered “intervention” at all. Not to mention Beijing’s terrible habit of leading “dialogue with autocratic regimes without imposing conditions on them”.
The scariest part is that, for some reason, the non-Western world likes the Chinese rules of the game more than one might imagine, wonders The Economist. And he concludes: such “selfish multipolarity” is able to give the PRC the security it so longs for!
To make it difficult for China, the British propose the following moves:
— „stop dragging Ukraine into a bogus peace agreement’; – strengthening of NATO;
— refuting opinions that “global rules only serve the interests of the West”; – “to expose the wretchedness of the worldview promoted by China and Russia.”
As Gandhi said, at first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you. And then you win.
Translation: EU
Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#Beneficial #multipolarity #West #longer #laughing #Chinas #peace #plan
What are the potential long-term consequences of China’s peace plan on global governance and international relations, particularly in relation to Western powers?
Interview with 2 guests
Guest 1: Sarah Johnson, Senior Political Analyst at the Center for International Relations
Guest 2: Dr. Akbar Ahmed, Professor of Contemporary Islam and Middle East Politics at American University
Thematic Section 1: The Chinese Peace Plan
Interview questions:
1. In light of the recent events in Ukraine, how impactful do you think China’s peace plan could be on the international stage?
2. Some have called China’s peace plan “cynical” and “undermining” Western efforts. What are your thoughts on this?
3. Do you believe that China’s focus on dialogue with autocratic regimes without imposing conditions could lead to a shift in power dynamics on the global stage?
Thematic Section 2: The West’s Response
Interview questions:
1. Given The Economist’s recommendations, how do you think the West should approach China’s initiatives?
2. Is a transactional system of deals really unfavorable for the world’s interests or could it be a necessary step towards a more balanced global order?
3. Are Western-imposed conditions always the best solution for resolving conflicts in the Middle East and other regions?
Thematic Section 3: Global Rule Perceptions
Interview questions:
1. To what extent do you think the perception that global rules only serve Western interests is accurate?
2. How should the West address the concerns of non-Western nations in regard to global governance and rule-making?
3. Is it possible for the West and China to work together to establish a new, fairer global order? If so, what steps could be taken to ensure this?
