Before 1:00 p.m. on Monday the 21st, errors in the pension ruling must be corrected

The Board of Directors of the Chamber of Deputies indicated that the Social Security Commission – chaired by the Moreno member Ivonne Cisneros – has until Monday, April 21 at 1:00 p.m. to correct the inconsistencies it incurred for having sent to the Plenary an opinion on the creation of the Pension Fund for Wellbeing, different from the one that had been approved on Monday the 15th in committees. That same day the 21st I would have to send it back to the Plenary Session.

The body indicated that “to give certainty, clarity and transparency to the legislative process”, it was agreed to return the opinion of the Pension Fund to the Social Security Ruling Commission, “observing the inconsistencies of the information in the opinion, with respect to what was approved in the Commission”.

Likewise, he emphasized that the responsibility of “submitting correctly, without errors or inconsistencies, and a reliable version of the approved opinions” rests with the aforementioned Commission and its technical team, which is why he rejected that it was the Board of Directors who changed the text.

As reported in this newspaper, Cisneros affirmed at the time that it had been the Board of Directors of San Lázaro who had made the error, a position that even differed with that of the coordinator of the Morena bench, Ignacio Mier, who attributed the ruling to the Social Security Commission.

Likewise, the Board of Directors stressed that, “for certainty of the procedure, the printed version of the opinion is always published, which is what makes it possible to ensure that it complies with the formulation requirements established in article 85 of the Rules of the Chamber, as well as the voting for and against and the attendance list.” Furthermore, he said, the Board “does not prepare opinions, it only processes them and processes the documents that the Commissions send.”

The organization emphasized that “the opinion of the Pension Fund that the Board of Directors received and published in the Parliamentary Gazette, in accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the Regulations of the Chamber of Deputies, is the one that contained the signatures of the member deputies. . The Board of Directors, through Parliamentary Services, published the physical opinion it received from the Social Security Commission.”