In Moscow they are talking about the third war
Kiev’s permission to use ATACMS long-range missiles is a response to Russia‘s surprise decision to bring North Korean troops into the war in Ukraine. This is according to American officials who wished to remain anonymous.
Mr. Biden’s major policy move has yet to be officially announced. His decision has divided his advisers, especially as there are two months left before he is officially replaced Donald Trump in the White House. The president-elect still claims that he will stop the war for a day.
So far the US was lazy
although they are finally providing Ukraine with the necessary equipment. However, it seems that not only Trump’s victory prompted Biden, but also the appearance of the North Korean military on Russia’s side. Similarly, Washington was first in the loop before giving up the HIMARS missile systems, the Patriot air defense systems, and the F-16 fighter jets. At this point, it is not clear whether Ukraine’s decision to use long-range missiles with a range of up to 300 km against targets in Russian territory could significantly change the course of the war. While Kiev waited months for a green light from Washington, Moscow seized the moment and moved potential targets – such as military bases and airfields from which to launch airstrikes on Ukraine. launch – out of missile range.
Kyiv already has ATACMS, but so far has only used them in the occupied territories of Ukraine. It is uncertain whether the US will be able to make new deliveries before Trump takes office.
Biden’s move has angered the Kremlin. “Biden has made one of the most impulsive, reckless decisions of his administration, which risks dire consequences,” the website of the government newspaper Rossiyskaya Gazeta said on Monday. Russian Senator Vladimir Dzhabarov called the decision “an unprecedented step towards the third world war”. According to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, the Biden administration is increasing tensions by “adding fuel to the fire”. ” and “draws Washington deeper into this conflict.” Political analysts are surprised that it is not until late Monday Vladimir Putinneither Donald Trump has commented on the Biden move. Because of this, there have also been allegations that the Republican may have been tipped off by the Democrat before the restrictions were lifted.
Several Western countries supported the US decision. “This was very necessary. Russia sees that Ukraine has strong support and that the position of the West is decisive. This may be a decisive moment in this war,” said Polish President Andrzej Duda. The foreign ministers of Germany, France and the Netherlands also welcomed the lifting of restrictions.
The EU’s top diplomat for foreign policy, Josep Borrell, expressed that hope
European countries he gives permission Use Ukraine and their weapons with long range,
to beat Russia. It may be referring to the British-French Storm Shadow missiles. While ATACMS can reach major Russian cities such as Kursk, Belgorod, Rostov-on-Don, Krasnodar, Novorossiysk and Crimea, the Storm Shadow version with a greater range of up to 560 km can Moscow, Podolsk, Ryazan, Volgograd and reach Sochi.
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky did not confirm or deny the reduction in restrictions on long-range missiles. However, he said: “Strikes will not be done with words. The rockets will speak for themselves. They definitely will.”
2024-11-18 20:00:00
#DPRK #troops #Ukraine #Biden #allowed #Kiev #hit #Russia #longrange #missiles #Obzor
What role do you believe European nations should play in supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression?
Interviewer: Good evening, Ladies and Gentlemen! Today we are joined by two very distinguished guests to discuss the recent developments in the war in Ukraine. Thank you for joining us.
Guest 1: Good evening.
Guest 2: Thank you for having us.
Interviewer: To start off with, what are your thoughts on President Biden’s decision to allow Ukraine to use US-made long-range missiles against targets in Russia? Do you believe it will significantly change the course of the war?
Guest 1: I think this is a bold move by President Biden, and it definitely shows the West’s growing support for Ukraine. The longer-range missiles will give Ukraine more options when it comes to targeting key Russian infrastructure and military assets. This could potentially shift the balance of power on the ground, putting more pressure on Russia to reconsider its strategy in Ukraine.
Guest 2: I agree to some extent, but I also believe that the impact of this decision will depend on how effectively Ukraine can use these missiles. Russia has already shifted many of its targets out of missile range, so simply having access to longer-range missiles may not be enough. Additionally, it’s important to consider potential retaliation from Russia, which could escalate the conflict further.
Interviewer: There are also concerns about the potential escalation of tensions between the US and Russia as a result of this decision. Do you think that the risk of a direct confrontation between the two nuclear powers is increasing?
Guest 1: It’s certainly a concern, but I don’t believe that President Biden made this decision lightly. He has weighed the risks and benefits, and it seems that he believes the potential benefits to Ukrainians outweigh the potential costs. That being said, both sides must exercise restraint to avoid any unintended consequences.
Guest 2: I share these concerns. The decision to lift restrictions on long-range missiles could be seen as provocative by Russia, especially given the context of their latest moves involving North Korean troops. We must be cautious and vigilant to avoid miscalculations or miscommunications that could lead to a dangerous escalation.
Interviewer: Moving on to European countries’ involvement in the conflict,
