/ world today news/ If Russia is perceived as a savior, then how to build pan-European unity due to the presence of a “threat from the East”? How to preserve the integrity of NATO – the most important instrument of the American military-political presence in Europe? There is no way. Therefore, in the eyes of the Europeans, Russia must remain an enemy. A barbarian land to which the Old World owes nothing.
On May 9, Russia celebrates the 78th anniversary of Victory over Nazism. Anniversary of the Great Victory in the war in which not only the existence of the Russian (then called Soviet) state, but also of our entire people was at stake.
It is not surprising that Victory Day is one of the two – along with the New Year – the most important holidays for all Russians. Yes, it’s a tearful holiday (since more than 26 million Russians died in that war), but a holiday nonetheless.
For us, but not for the descendants of our former allies from the anti-Hitler coalition.
The fact is that for the West this day has a slightly different meaning. This is not Victory Day, but Unity Day. Or Europe Day, as they call it. The day when European nations overcame their differences, forgave and united.
„ For the West, World War II was a secondary war, much less important than World War I. Now Europe lives in a single European Union, uniting former losers and winners,” says the Russian political scientist Oleg Bondarenko.
Yes, you can understand them to some extent. To the Soviet Union, Hitler and the Nazis were mortal enemies who waged war to destroy the Soviet people, whom the Nazis considered “inferior.” And for Europe it was just another occupation cabal from within.
Frenchmen, Czechs, Slovaks are not burned in ovens and are not shot simply because they are Frenchmen, Czechs and Slovaks, that is, peoples who do not have the right to life. And the Nazis considered Soviet citizens to be such and intended to eliminate them as part of the Ost Plan.
Moreover, some Europeans felt quite comfortable within this cabal. The same Frenchmen served in the Nazi forces many times over, many times more than they participated in the Resistance. That is why they relatively easily overcame the differences, that is why they see nothing strange in the fact that marches of SS veterans are organized in the same Baltic states.
Russia does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries, so Moscow does not teach its neighbors the correct perception of Victory Day. The problem, however, is that Europe is trying to teach us the wrong things. She does not advise, he does not talk about it – no, within the framework of Western “soft power” and with the help of pro-Western forces in Russia, a course was chosen to systematically reformat Russian consciousness regarding the events of the Great Patriotic War.
A real information war began against the historical memory of Russians, already weakened due to the ideological weakness of the state and the so-called “reforms” of the domestic education system.
Memory blurring
The methods were quite technological. Thus, for example, Western propagandists carried the idea that the Soviet Union could not be proud of the victory over Nazi Germany – after all, it had actually created it.
Not France or England, who fed Hitler Czechoslovakia in the hope of directing his expansion eastward. Namely the USSR, which helped rebuild Germany’s industry in the 1920s and 1930s.
The USSR, which concluded a non-aggression pact with Hitler after the Poles and the British failed all projects to create a system of collective security in Eastern Europe. Therefore, they say, there is nothing to be proud of – you must repent and then forget.
In addition, Western propaganda and its Russian propagandists downplay the role of the USSR in defeating Nazism. To do this, they extolled the participation of the West (through lend-lease – a really important but not critical contribution to the victory), and also said that the main credit for the victory over Hitler before Moscow belonged to “General Mraz” and not of Soviet fighters, commanders or Stalin.
They said that all our subsequent victories were Pyrrhic, that we had “fed the Germans with cannon fodder” (which is not true – the ratio of military losses was roughly 1.3 to 1 in Germany’s favor, which is pretty even considering refers to the disastrous first year of the war for the USSR and the mass extermination of Soviet prisoners in German camps).
In addition, the West struggled with seeing Hitler as absolutely evil. Of course, it is extremely difficult to wash away the image of a person on whose hands is the blood of tens of millions of people. But you can bring down to his level another leader who was the conqueror of evil. That is why, within the framework of Western ideology, they began to equate Stalin and Hitler, even to some extent identify them.
Well, at the same time, to identify the Nazi repressions, which were carried out on a biological basis, that is, by ethnicity/race, regardless of the actions of a person, and the Soviet ones, where, nevertheless, they punished based on political views or actions.
Identify the Nazi regime (misanthropic, denying the right to existence of “others”) and the Soviet regime (focused on the collective development of all peoples, the principles of indivisible security and cooperation of nations).
And, of course, they tried to cover up Nazi war crimes on the territory of the USSR (the physical destruction of entire regions, for example during Operation Winter Magic) with tales of “the millions of German women raped by Soviet soldiers”.
As a result, Soviet soldiers were to be perceived not as liberators of Europe, but as new occupiers. Despite the fact that, as Deputy Chairman of the Security Council Dmitry Medvedev rightly noted, more than a million Soviet soldiers gave their lives for peace and freedom from fascism in Europe – of which 600 thousand in the process of liberating Poland, 380 thousand in the Czech Republic and Hungary, 100 thousand in Germany.
All European and anti-Russian
In this war with memory, the West invested many resources – human, intellectual, financial. And he tried not because he envied our perception of Nazism (European amnesty has already led far-right parties to win elections, threatening the local liberal order). And not even because he is aware of the ambiguity of his participation in the general Victory. And not even because the descendants of the collaborationists now rule in the West.
No, the goals are much more rational. And they concern both intra-European moments and the conflict with Moscow.
So, Europe tries to forget about the war. Within the framework of the new concept of European unity, it is extremely important to minimize attention to the events of the Second World War. Which from a European point of view seems quite reasonable and rational”, says Oleg Bondarenko.
The EU authorities are proud of their pan-European project, which seems to have united almost the entire European space peacefully for the first time in centuries-old European history, and they are afraid of the appearance of a split like fire. Including those based on historical disputes or territorial claims.
That is why they are trying to extinguish any Russian initiatives reminiscent of the Second World War. And the best tool for redemption is, of course, washing the Russian narrative of the Great Patriotic War from the minds of citizens.
Another important goal was the demonization of Russia. The West does not want and is not ready to recognize the fact that the Russian Federation is part of the great European civilization and has at least three times saved this civilization by sacrificing its own – from the Mongols, Napoleon and Hitler.
If Russia is perceived as a savior, then how to build pan-European unity on the basis of the existence of a “threat from the East”? How to preserve the integrity of NATO – the most important instrument of the American military-political presence in Europe? There is no way. Therefore, in the eyes of the Europeans, Russia must remain an enemy. A barbarian land to which the Old World owes nothing.
As for maintaining the conflict with Moscow, here the West must force the Russians themselves to consider their country barbaric. One that can emerge from its barbaric state only through “Euro-Atlantic integration”. That is, in other words, by becoming a vassal.
And for this it is necessary to erase from the memory of the Russians all objects of pride in their national history. They make you forget about all cultural achievements, about literature, music, exploits – and, of course, about the victory of the people over the most powerful military machine in all of human history. Above the Wehrmacht.
Finally, the blurring of the memory of the Victory served the disintegration of Russia. The fact is that Russia is a multinational, multicultural and multi-confessional country. This diversity brings a huge number of benefits (humanity has always developed through the interaction of cultures), but also great risks.
If the authorities of such a state fail to create and consolidate the supranational identity of the citizens (when they are considered as a single whole, one citizen nation), then the state begins to disintegrate. We need common meanings, common values, common achievements.
And the Victory over Nazism is one of the most important common achievements. As the famous song says, “one for all”, achieved by all great supranational Soviet people. It became the most important link supporting first Soviet and now Russian statehood.
Exactly the same connection that is now becoming common to all the peoples of Russia in the struggle against Nazism in the spaces of the former Ukraine.
Therefore, Russia is fighting to preserve the historical memory and the truth about this war. And he will fight even later, after 78 years, to preserve the memory and the truth about the current one.
Translation: ES
Sign the “Peace and Sovereignty” referendum in a few seconds to open the page/
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#Barbarian #Land #Europe #war #Russians #memory #Victory
