First published at 11:25 UTC on November 15th, 2020.
video-description">
The course of the so-called Corona crisis as a global phenomenon for 2020 will have to be analyzed in retrospect to determine why the politics and science involved only agree on a justification analysis tool …
– MORE
The course of the so-called corona crisis as a worldwide phenomenon for 2020 will have to be analyzed in retrospect to determine why the politics and science involved were only able to agree on a justification analysis tool. The PCR test. Since mid-January this year, the PCR test developed by the German virologist Christian Drosten and his team from the Berlin Charité has been used almost worldwide in the fight against the corona virus. Since the end of March, laboratories in Germany have carried out around 350,000 tests per week. The Robert Koch Institute states that over a million tests can now be evaluated every week. Elementary questions arise now. Who has legitimized this approach? What role does the sequence of the hour play in this? Are the results of these PCR tests really meaningful in terms of content?
If not, who is liable for this epochal error? Ken Jebsen asks the lawyer Dr. Pure fill me. The conversation sheds light on the status quo of a legal consideration of this greatest social crisis since World War II.
The biography of Dr. Pure Fuellmich:
August 1985 to June 1986 Research Associate at the Research Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Law (Directors: Prof. Dr. Erwin Deutsch and Prof. Dr. Hans Ludwig Schreiber) October 1991 to May 1992 Deutsche Bank AG, Tokyo branch April 1993 to March 2001 Scientific assistant at the chair of Prof. Dr. Dr. hc mult. Erwin Deutsch, Faculty of Law at the University of Göttingen October / November 1994 EU lecturer at the University of Tartu in Estonia May 2002 to May 2003 Lecturer / Professor, GISMA University Hannover, Germany / Indiana USA Since mid-July 2020 leading member of the Corona Committee
