the COVID-19 pandemic: A Profound Operation or a Natural Phenomenon?
The COVID-19 pandemic has left an indelible mark on the world,but according to infectionist Assoc. Prof. Atanas Mangurov, it was more than just a health crisis. In a revealing interview with Lily Marinkova on the Facts Studio program ”Conversation,” Mangurov suggested that the pandemic was a “giant operation” designed to generate enormous profits. “A viral infection that no one has yet to dare and does not want to say weather it was a natural phenomenon or artificially created, has become an event used in the most favorable way,” he stated.
This bold claim raises questions about the true nature of the pandemic and its handling. Mangurov emphasized that the response to the infection deviated from standard protocols, hinting at ulterior motives. “And contrary to all ways and rules for an infection. And all this was for the purpose of making huge money,” he added.
The Vaccination debate and Military Reinstatement
The conversation also touched on the contentious issue of COVID-19 vaccinations. Mangurov highlighted a recent growth involving former U.S.president Donald Trump, who signed a decree to reinstate military personnel discharged for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine.”These people are restoring them now – but it is indeed crucial to say that these are people who were not against vaccines at all. These were people who refused to vaccinate for Covid,” Mangurov explained. He stressed the need to differentiate between the COVID-19 vaccine and other vaccines, a distinction frequently enough overlooked in public discourse.
Post-Pandemic Mortality Trends: A Curious Phenomenon
One of the most intriguing aspects of Mangurov’s analysis is the “post-catheter phenomenon” observed in various countries. He noted that nations with high COVID-19 vaccination rates,such as those in Western Europe,are experiencing a sustained +10% additional mortality rate since April-May 2022. In contrast,countries with lower vaccination rates,like Romania and Hungary,are seeing a negative additional mortality rate ranging from -5% to -8%.
“This is an interesting phenomenon, but no one bothers to open it. And the difference is serious. We will never understand the essence of what happened,” Mangurov remarked. This disparity in mortality rates raises critical questions about the long-term effects of widespread immunization and the factors driving these trends.key Insights at a Glance
| Aspect | Details |
|———————————|—————————————————————————–|
| Pandemic Motives | alleged operation to generate profits,with unclear origins of the virus. |
| Vaccination Debate | Military personnel reinstated after refusing COVID-19 vaccines. |
| Post-Pandemic Mortality | High-vaccination countries: +10% additional mortality; low-vaccination: -5% to -8%. |
Watch the Full Conversation
For a deeper dive into Assoc. Prof. Atanas Mangurov’s insights, watch the full interview here.
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a subject of intense scrutiny and debate.As new data emerges, the world grapples with understanding its true impact and the lessons it leaves behind. What do you think about these revelations? Share your thoughts and join the conversation.The article received an evaluation of 3.6 based on 47 votes, reflecting a mixed but generally positive reception. This rating system allows users to express thier opinions directly, contributing to a dynamic and interactive experience. The rating mechanism is straightforward, with users selecting between one and five stars to voice their feedback.
Here’s a breakdown of the rating system and its importance:
| Aspect | Details |
|———————-|————————————–|
| Rating Scale | 1 to 5 stars |
| Total Votes | 47 |
| Average Rating | 3.6 |
| User Engagement | Direct feedback through star selection |
The evaluation process is designed to be user-friendly, encouraging participation without overwhelming the audience. as one user noted, “The simplicity of the rating system makes it easy to share my thoughts quickly.” this approach ensures that feedback is both accessible and meaningful.
The 3.6 rating suggests that while the content resonates with many, there is room for enhancement. This balance of praise and constructive criticism highlights the importance of continuous refinement in content creation.By fostering user engagement, the platform not only gathers valuable insights but also builds a sense of community among its audience.
for those interested in contributing their own feedback, the rating system is a simple yet effective way to make your voice heard. Whether you’re a frequent visitor or a first-time reader, your input helps shape the future of the content.
What do you think about the 3.6 rating? Does it align with your experience? Share your thoughts and join the conversation today!