Buenos Aires. As warned by former president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, the National Court of Cassation confirmed this Wednesday the sentence of six years in prison and perpetual disqualification from holding public office against the Peronist for the Road Traffic case, which refers to the purchase of a public work in the southern province of Santa Cruz.
The sentence and its ratification were given without any evidence, because the conviction was based on false news published in the mass media of power, which is a true legal scandal, as has happened with other rulers in our region, such as in Brazil, with Lula da Silva.
More than 250 presidents, former presidents and political leaders immediately expressed their solidarity with Fernández de Kirchner, through a letter in which they repudiated the judicial ruling of judges Mariano Borinsky, Gustavo Hornos and Diego Barroetaveña, all of the so-called Judicial Party, by denouncing that It is a practice of lawfare “to outlaw it and install hate speech.”
Supported, among others, by presidents Xiomara Castro, of Honduras; Luis Arce, from Bolivia, or the former leaders Rafael Correa, from Ecuador and from Colombia, Ernesto Samper, the signatories also rejected the “political, media and judicial persecution to which they are being subjected.”
They pointed out that “there is no doubt that the case is part of a systematic plan of persecution, articulated by political, media and judicial sectors,” highlighting that the case was plagued by procedural and legal irregularities that caused a serious impact on constitutional guarantees. of the former president, especially her right to defense in court.”
They argued that the most dramatic consequence of this political persecution was “promoted by the hegemonic media, in the attempted assassination of September 1, 2022.”
The ruling is not final because there is an appeal, as a last resort, for the intervention of the Supreme Court of Justice, whose judges also belong to the Judicial Party, in addition to the open intervention of the US embassy.
The former president was not expected to go to prison now and even next year she may be a candidate in the legislative elections of 2025, and nor can perpetual disqualification from holding public office be imposed on her, because it only becomes effective when the sentences become final. , so there is still a way to go.
Likewise, she could not be convicted of the charge of illicit association, in which she was deemed to be the “boss” of it, along with a list of eight former officials, and a businessman from the province of Santa Cruz, who were also convicted this year. day.
This case had been closed due to a complete lack of evidence and was opened under the government of former president Mauricio Macri.
The time for the court to act is unlimited, even if it ratifies this sentence, the file must be returned to the Federal Oral Court 2 of the Comodoro Py courts.
The Supreme Court is not in its best moment and in addition to having demonstrated impartiality in recent years, it cannot be forgotten that former President Macri, in January 2016, less than a month after assuming power, appointed two judges by decree Carlos Rosenkrantz and Horacio Rosatti, which was quickly denounced as illegal and passed through the Senate, where it managed to prevail narrowly over the opposition.
Today the president, Javier Milei, commented that he does not rule out appointing by decree Ariel Lijo and Manuel García Mansilla to join the Supreme Court, which will remain with only three judges, due to the retirement of one of them.
Both judges are rejected by the opposition, not only from Unión por la Patria (Peronist), but by other sectors, and numerous investigations have appeared that denounce the lack of merit to assume these positions.
While Milei celebrated the conviction of the former president, whom he referred to as “guilty of acts of corruption,” he boasted on social networks about the influence that his government has on justice. “Everything comes,” he said in a message, adding: “Today we can affirm, without a doubt, that Cristina Fernández de Kirchner is guilty of acts of corruption. End”.
Meanwhile, Cristina remained at the Instituto Patria party headquarters, where a number of militants attended and applauded her.
Afterwards, she met in the suburban neighborhood of Moreno with 400 women, to whom she said: “When you are a woman, everything is made twenty times more difficult for you. “Not only are they punishing me for everything I did, but also because I am a woman and they don’t believe that I am right.”
“How can they not give me a blow, they do what they did today in Comodoro Py,” he added.
She also recalled that the situation she is going through “alongside what thousands and thousands of women have had to endure” in terms of gender violence, this “I do not see as a sacrifice, but as an obligation of someone who has a country project”.
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,
‘
fbq(‘init’, ‘133913093805922’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Contact’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Donate’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘FindLocation’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Lead’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Search’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘Subscribe’, {value: ‘0.00’, currency: ‘MXN’, predicted_ltv: ‘0.00’});
fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
#Argentina #Cristina #Fernández #disqualified #alleged #corruption
–
**How has the international community’s reaction to the Cristina Fernández de Kirchner verdict impacted the perception of judicial independence in Argentina?**
## Interview: The Cristina Fernández de Kirchner Case – Justice or Persecution?
**Introduction:**
Welcome to World Today News. Today, we’re discussing the recent court ruling against former Argentinian President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, a case that has ignited passionate debates about justice, politics, and the role of media. We’re joined by two esteemed guests today: [Guest 1 Name & Expertise], and [Guest 2 Name & Expertise]. Welcome to both of you.
**Section 1: The Verdict and its Implications**
* **Question for Guest 1:** The court upheld the six-year prison sentence against Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. Can you elaborate on the specific charges and evidence presented in this case?
* **Question for Guest 2:** Many are calling this ruling a politically motivated “lawfare” tactic. What evidence supports this claim, and how does it impact public trust in the Argentinian judiciary?
* **Question for both:** This case appears to be deeply entwined with broader political tensions in Argentina. How does this verdict fit into the current political landscape?
**Section 2: International Reactions and Solidarity**
* **Question for Guest 1:** Over 250 political figures worldwide have expressed solidarity with Ms. Fernández de Kirchner. What are the implications of such widespread international support?
* **Question for Guest 2:** Critics argue that this international support is driven by leftist ideology rather than genuine concern for justice. How do you respond to this argument?
**Section 3: The Role of Media and Public Opinion**
* **Question for Guest 1:** The article mentions the role of “mass media of power” in shaping public perception of the case. How has media coverage influenced public opinion in Argentina, and what are the ethical considerations involved?
* **Question for Guest 2:** Social media has also played a significant role in this case. How have different platforms shaped the narrative surrounding Ms. Fernández de Kirchner and the court’s decision?
**Section 4: Looking Ahead - Future Legal Proceedings and Political Consequences**
* **Question for Guest 1:** The Supreme Court holds the key to whether this verdict is final. What are the possible scenarios moving forward, and how might a Supreme Court decision further impact the political landscape in Argentina?
* **Question for Guest 2:** With President Milei expressing confidence in the court’s ruling and a potential appointment of two new judges, what are your concerns regarding the independence and impartiality of the Argentinian judiciary?
* **Question for both:** How will this case resonate in the lead-up to the 2025 legislative elections?
**Concluding Remarks:**
* **Interviewer**: Thank you both for sharing your insights on this complex and impactful case. We encourage our viewers to continue engaging with these important issues and seeking diverse perspectives. This is a developing story, and we will continue to follow it closely.