Latvian Artist Reflects on War’s enduring Legacy
Table of Contents
The ongoing war in Europe has sparked global debate, with even the newly elected US President calling for an end to the conflict. Amidst this turmoil, a Latvian artist offers a unique perspective on the cyclical nature of war and it’s impact on civilization. His insights, gleaned from a lifetime immersed in history and art, provide a compelling counterpoint to the current political discourse.
Following a meeting between President Zelenskyy and the US President, Zelenskyy emphasized Ukraine’s desire for a “just and strong world,” a sentiment echoed by many. However, former German chancellor Angela Merkel’s recent memoirs highlight the complexities of negotiating with world leaders, stating that even agreements with Putin “would not mean anything.” This underscores the deep-seated distrust and challenges in achieving lasting peace.
In a recent interview, Imants Lancmanis, a renowned Latvian painter and art historian, shared his thoughts on the current global situation. His perspective,shaped by his experiences as a child of wartime and his lifelong study of history,offers a sobering reflection on the seemingly certain cycle of conflict.
When asked about the current state of global affairs, and referencing a similar sentiment expressed by historian August Winkler in Die zeit, Lancmanis stated, “Yes, that’s right. Basically, we have been entering World War III for some time now. And besides, I believe that not at the moment, which is now, but already with the onset of Covid.”
lancmanis’s perspective extends beyond the immediate conflict. He views war not merely as isolated events, but as recurring chapters in the ongoing narrative of human civilization. He notes the transformative effects of past wars, stating, “So there was the First World War, there was the Second World War that we experienced, and each came with its own twists. After the First World War, the great empires collapsed…But during the Second World War, capitalism was revived and socialist utopias were slowly coming to an end.”
“Regrettably,no matter how terrible it is indeed,on the one hand,yes,there is this commandment,the fifth commandment - you shall not kill,and of course it is the commandment that is broken the most and constantly. so, consequently of him, there are wars, wars, wars, and each of them is necessary, no matter how terrible it is, no matter how much I loathe wars, no matter how deeply I hate them. I am forced to understand, first of all, they are inevitable, they are embedded, so to speak, in the code of human development. And each of them brings with them not only endless destruction, but some kind of renewal.”
Lancmanis’s poignant reflection on the cyclical nature of war, coupled with his acknowledgment of the devastating consequences, offers a nuanced perspective on the current global landscape. His words serve as a reminder of the enduring impact of conflict and the need for ongoing efforts towards peace and understanding.
While the artist’s comments don’t offer easy answers, they provide a framework for understanding the complexities of war and its lasting effects on societies worldwide. His perspective, rooted in historical context and personal experience, resonates deeply with the ongoing global conversation about peace and the future of international relations.
A Historian’s Reflection: Pandemic,War,and the Unfolding of History
The COVID-19 pandemic,a global crisis unlike any seen in a generation,initially offered a glimmer of hope to some. The unprecedented global response, marked by lockdowns, mask mandates, and a rapid vaccine rollout, suggested a potential departure from historical patterns. One historian, reflecting on this period, noted a perceived parallel between past conflicts and the pandemic’s emergence. ”We know very well that the previous wars did not come alone,” he observed, “they went together – war and pestilence or pestilence and war, but usually war comes first and then pestilence.”
This individual, whose insights offer a unique perspective on the interplay of global events, believed the pandemic might represent a less catastrophic choice to a major global conflict. The rapid development and deployment of vaccines, despite their varying effectiveness, fueled a sense of optimism. “I was happy and kept thinking: well, maybe we’ll get through this one stage, this plague, and it won’t be like after the First world War, when after the war came the Spanish flu, which killed tens of millions,” he recalled. The hope was that this time, the order would be reversed – a contained pandemic, followed by an absence of large-scale war.
Though, this optimistic outlook was shattered. The historian’s perspective shifted dramatically with the onset of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on Febuary 24th, 2022. He articulated this shift with a powerful statement: ”And then February 24 came. It was clear to me – no,everything will be as it should be.This envelope functioned as it has functioned throughout the long development of mankind.”
This statement highlights a belief in the cyclical nature of history, where periods of upheaval and crisis, whether pandemic or war, seem to follow a recurring pattern.The historian’s view suggests that the pandemic, while significant, was not a deviation from this historical norm but perhaps a precursor to a larger conflict. The seemingly random nature of events,often cited as the catalyst for war,was also addressed. “Coincidence basically prepares 1000 things that lead everything towards it,” he explained. “All thes cogs are slowly moving forward, and only what looks like a coincidence is just one cog jerk that is the basis of its explosion.”
The historian’s reflections offer a sobering perspective on the interconnectedness of global events and the enduring patterns of conflict and crisis throughout human history. The COVID-19 pandemic, initially viewed as a potential turning point, ultimately served as a stark reminder of the cyclical nature of global instability and the unpredictable interplay of disease and war.
Echoes of the past: A Latvian Artist on War’s Enduring legacy
The ongoing war in Ukraine has sparked global debate, with even the newly elected US President calling for an end to the conflict. Amidst this turmoil, Latvian artist Imants Lancmanis offers a unique perspective on the cyclical nature of war and its impact on civilization. His insights, gleaned from a lifetime immersed in history and art, provide a compelling counterpoint to the current political discourse.
A Cycle of Conflict
Senior Editor: Imants, thank you for speaking with us. Given the current climate, many are questioning if we are on the brink of a larger conflict. You’ve spoken before about the inevitability of war. Could you further explore this idea?
Imants lancmanis: Thank you for having me. It’s a tough topic, but one that needs to be discussed.Yes, unfortunately, I believe we have been moving towards a wider conflict for some time. It’s not just the war in Ukraine; the pandemic itself was a warning sign. These seismic events, these punctuations in time, they seem to point towards a larger shift, a cycle repeating itself.
Senior Editor: Do you see this cycle as certain, a tragic flaw in human nature?
Imants Lancmanis: Regrettably, no matter how terrible it is indeed, on the one hand, yes, there is this commandment, the fifth commandment – you shall not kill, and of course it is the commandment that is broken the most and constantly. So, consequently of him, there are wars, wars, wars, and each of them is necessary, no matter how terrible it is, no matter how much I loathe wars, no matter how deeply I hate them. I am forced to understand,first of all,they are inevitable,they are embedded,so to speak,in the code of human progress. And each of them brings with them not only endless destruction but some kind of renewal.
the Transformative Power of War
Senior Editor: Renewal? That’s a powerful word considering the devastation that war inflicts. Can you elaborate on how war brings about renewal?
Imants Lancmanis: Through history, we’ve seen that war, while horrific, often acts as a catalyst for change.
Think of World War I; the collapse of empires, the rise of new ideologies. World War II saw the revival of capitalism, the decline of socialist utopias. These conflicts, while dreadful, reshaped the world.
Senior Editor: it’s a sobering thought, the idea
that progress can spring from such destruction.
Imants Lancmanis: Indeed. it is a paradox. Perhaps, in our inherent flaws, in our capacity for violence, there is also the seed for rebirth, a painful but necessary evolution.
Engagement with History
senior Editor: Your work as an artist and a historian seems to inform each other.How do you approach these disciplines in the context of war and its legacy?
Imants Lancmanis: I believe art can be a powerful tool for understanding history, for confronting the truths, even the uncomfortable ones, that war reveals.
My paintings are not simply depictions of battles or destruction; they are explorations of the human condition, of our struggles, our resilience, and the enduring question of what it means to be human in the face of such immense suffering.
Senior Editor: A vital question indeed. Thank you for sharing your insights,Imants. Your perspective offers a powerful reminder of the complexities and enduring legacy of war.