Vivo X90 Pro is a mobile phone with good photography equipment. The main 1.0″ sensor is very large, and the surface of the sensor has a key influence on the quality of the output. In addition, it is helped by optical stabilization and a decent aperture of F1.8. It has a 23mm focal length and converts the 50Mpx resolution to the resulting 12Mpx photos. The camera with a telephoto lens also has 50 Mpx resolution, which is converted to 12 Mpx, has optical stabilization and has twice the zoom (50 mm converted) compared to the main camera. Its strength is the above-standard F1.6 aperture. The ultra-wide camera has a 12 Mpx resolution, 16 mm converted and F2.0 aperture .
Overall, this photomobile was very successful, it has only a minimum of defects and many advantages. Especially for the main camera and the camera with a telephoto lens, their output is very detailed, it renders even fine structures, while the drawing is natural. When setting such a high bar, the ultra-wide seems like an inferior lens – although it falls short of the quality of flagship ultra-wides, it’s still an above-average camera.
Watch the commented analysis of the photo shoot and its results in the video at the beginning of the article.
Main camera it’s great in almost every way and in every situation, day or night. It has a very detailed drawing and minimal errors. Objectively, it can only be criticized for one thing, and that is the inconsistency when taking photos in backlight or light-demanding scenes. Sometimes such a photo is completely seamless, other times a light veil emanating from the place where the light is coming from covers part of it. This is just a small thing on an otherwise great camera.
Photos from the main sensor have a detailed and natural drawing
50Mpx mode adds additional details to the photo
Even at night, the main camera performs almost flawlessly
Ultra wide angler is the weakest link. It’s the only one that doesn’t have optical image stabilization, so it’s not that good at night. Just an average sensor causes unpleasant image artifacts even during the day and in challenging lighting conditions. The camera also suffers from several optical defects such as distortion or chromatic aberration. But overall, it delivers a solid performance; if you do not view the resulting photos in detail and zoom in, you will be satisfied with it.
At first glance, most of the problems are not visible, but when you zoom in, you will find a fainter drawing
The ultra-wide-angle lens can also serve as a macro lens
The ultra-wide night shot isn’t perfect, but the output is usable
A camera with a telephoto lens it is of very high quality and its output is again very detailed and without optical defects. It can be blamed for poorer glare control in sunlight, however, for example at night, street lamps do not have the same problem.
The drawing of the telephoto camera is detailed and natural
The recalculated 50mm focal length allows you to see even at longer distances
This camera has a surprisingly good output even in poor lighting conditions
You can find a detailed analysis in the commented video analysis in the introduction.
