an alarming decision in the face of environmental and health risks

The European Commission recently made a decision that shook the political and environmental landscape: the renewal of the authorization of glyphosate for a decade. This announcement, which occurred on November 16, 2023, surprised the 27 member countries of the European Union, divided on the question of banning this controversial herbicide.

A divided Europe facing a hasty decision

The Commission’s decision, brought forward by one month compared to the initial schedule, revealed a lack of unanimity within the EU. Voices are raised against this authorization. Pascal Canfin, Renaissance MEP, expresses deep regret at this decision, while Karima Delli, Greens/European Free Alliance MEP, denounces a lack of courage on the part of the Commission.

France, between abstention and restrictive measures

The French position on this issue is particularly interesting. During the vote, France opted for abstention, an approach defended by the Minister of Agriculture, Marc Fesneau. According to him, it is necessary to regulate the use of glyphosate rather than banning it completely, without viable alternatives. This position, although nuanced, reflects a desire to find a balance between agricultural imperatives and environmental issues.

Contrasted reactions: relief and indignation

On the farmers’ side, some express relief at this decision, seeing in this ten-year reprieve an opportunity to continue using this controversial tool. On the other hand, Christophe Béchu, Minister of Ecological Transition, describes the EU’s decision to authorize glyphosate without limits for ten years as “crazy”. He confirms that France will continue to ban this pesticide for all non-agricultural uses.

France, pioneer in glyphosate reduction

Under the leadership of Christophe Béchu, France stands out for its proactive policy in reducing the use of glyphosate. With a 27% decrease in its use compared to the 2015-2017 period, the country is positioning itself as a European leader in limiting this herbicide. Non-agricultural uses of glyphosate are already prohibited, and the government is working with the agricultural sectors to limit, or even ban, its use where alternatives exist.

What about next?

The European Commission’s decision raises crucial questions about the future of agriculture and environmental protection in Europe. While some countries, such as France, are taking steps to limit the use of glyphosate, the EU as a whole still seems far from a coherent and unified policy on this thorny issue. The road to a European consensus on sustainable and environmentally friendly agricultural practices promises to be long and fraught with pitfalls.