Amnesty International denies Fake Contract Allegedly Paying Lali Espósito 200 Million pesos
In a recent wave of misinformation, supporters of javier Milei’s government circulated a fabricated image claiming that Amnesty International paid argentine singer Lali Espósito 200 million pesos to attend an anti-fascist march in Buenos aires. The organization swiftly debunked the claim, calling it a “false and edited photo” and denying any such agreement with the artist.
The controversy began when social media users shared the alleged contract, which purportedly showed Amnesty International compensating Espósito for her participation in the march. Though, the organization clarified in an Instagram post, “We never pay anything to Lali. deliberately use the logo of Infobae and the name of Amnesty International to give ‘credibility’ to a document that does not even have the basic information that a contract needs to be valid.” They further mocked the document’s design, stating, “The ‘design’ of the contract, guys, please, is made with medieval tools.”
In a statement on their website, Amnesty International emphasized that the document was clearly fake, lacking essential details such as the full names of the parties or any contractual elements that align with their clarity protocols. They also noted that the alleged news was not published on Infobae, despite the misuse of its logo.
the march, which took place in response to President Milei’s remarks at the Davos forum, saw Espósito joining fellow artists maría Becerra and Taichu on the balcony of the iconic El Tunnel bookstore on Avenida de Mayo. The trio greeted the crowd, with Espósito wearing a shirt featuring the LGTBIQ+ flag and a powerful message: “Everyone talks about freedom but they see someone free and frighten.”
Espósito herself responded to the fake news, sending a message of support to Amnesty International: “To go ahead with truth and love.”
This incident highlights a broader trend of malicious information aimed at discrediting human rights organizations and activists. Amnesty International condemned the fake news,stating,”This fake news is given within the framework of a series of malicious information that seek to delegitimize the work of groups,organizations,and referents that fight for human rights.”
| Key Points | Details |
|—————-|————-|
| Allegation | Fake contract claims Amnesty International paid Lali Espósito 200 million pesos to attend a march. |
| Response | Amnesty International denies the claim, calling the document “false and edited.” |
| March Details | Anti-fascist march in Buenos Aires,attended by Espósito,María Becerra,and Taichu. |
| Espósito’s Message | Wore an LGTBIQ+ flag shirt with the phrase: ”Everyone talks about freedom but they see someone free and frighten.” |
As misinformation continues to spread, the importance of verifying sources and supporting organizations like Amnesty International remains critical. Stay informed and vigilant against attempts to undermine genuine human rights efforts.
Debunking Misinformation: Amnesty International adn the Fake Contract Involving Lali Espósito
Table of Contents
In a recent wave of misinformation, a fabricated image claimed that Amnesty International paid Argentine singer Lali Espósito 200 million pesos to attend an anti-fascist march in Buenos Aires. The organization swiftly debunked the claim, calling it a “false and edited photo” and denying any such agreement with the artist. To clarify this issue, we sat down with Dr.Sofia Ramirez, an expert in digital misinformation and human rights advocacy, to discuss the incident and its broader implications.
the Allegation and Amnesty international’s Response
Senior Editor: Dr. Ramirez,can you explain the nature of the fake contract that circulated online and Amnesty International’s response to it?
Dr.Sofia Ramirez: Certainly. The fake contract was a poorly designed image that falsely claimed Amnesty International had paid Lali espósito 200 million pesos to attend an anti-fascist march in Buenos Aires. The organization quickly denounced it as a ”false and edited photo,” emphasizing that they never paid Espósito for her participation. They also pointed out that the document lacked essential details like full names or valid contractual elements,and even mocked its design,calling it “made with medieval tools.” This was a clear attempt to discredit both Espósito and Amnesty International.
The March and Its Significance
Senior Editor: The march in question was a response to President Milei’s remarks at the Davos Forum. Could you elaborate on its significance and who attended?
Dr.Sofia Ramirez: Absolutely. The march was a powerful presentation against fascism and in support of human rights, organized in response to President Javier Milei’s controversial remarks at the Davos Forum. Lali Espósito, along with fellow artists María Becerra and Taichu, participated prominently. They greeted the crowd from the balcony of the iconic El Tunnel bookstore on Avenida de Mayo. Espósito wore a shirt featuring the LGTBIQ+ flag with the message: “everyone talks about freedom but they see someone free and frighten.” This was a powerful statement against repression and a call for genuine freedom.
Espósito’s Response and the Role of Misinformation
Senior Editor: How did Espósito respond to the fake news,and what does this incident say about the broader trend of misinformation?
Dr. Sofia Ramirez: Espósito responded with grace and strength.She sent a message of support to amnesty International, stating, “To go ahead with truth and love.” This incident is part of a larger trend of malicious data aimed at discrediting human rights organizations and activists. Amnesty International condemned the fake news, stating it was part of a series of efforts to delegitimize groups fighting for human rights. It’s a reminder of how misinformation can be used as a tool to undermine legitimate causes.
Combating Misinformation and Supporting Human Rights
Senior Editor: What steps can individuals and organizations take to combat misinformation and support human rights efforts?
Dr. sofia Ramirez: The first step is to verify sources critically. Always cross-check information with reliable outlets and look for official statements from organizations like Amnesty International. Supporting these organizations through donations, advocacy, and spreading verified information is crucial. We also need to educate ourselves and others about the tactics used in misinformation campaigns, so we can recognize and challenge them effectively.
Conclusion
Senior Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ramirez, for your insights. To summarize, this incident highlights the importance of vigilance against misinformation and the need to support organizations like Amnesty International, which work tirelessly to defend human rights. Let’s all strive to stay informed and counter attempts to undermine genuine efforts for justice and equality.
