/ world today news/ There is no more influential military thinker in the United States than the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley. He is responsible for the military security of North America and is the most authoritative expert on predicting risks to it. It seems that it is the risks associated with a war in Ukraine that have become America’s concern.
For example, the USA is afraid that by sacrificing its weapons stockpiles to Ukraine, it will remain defenseless against Russia and armies of Buryats with “Katyusha” will invade the free latitudes. And there is no one in Washington’s military Olympus to assuage America’s anxieties.
Only General Mark Milley, who has a firm grip on the reins of the Pentagon, is as calm as the Statue of Liberty in New York Bay.
“Arms supplies to Ukraine do not threaten the security of the United States,” General Mark Milley said in an interview with The Washington Times.
He claims that they are watching to ensure that American warehouses are not depleted and that exporting surpluses will not harm them. Especially since these surpluses will become a contribution to the upcoming victory of Ukraine.
As the Pentagon recently reported, the US has sent more than two thousand Stinger anti-aircraft missile systems, more than 10,000 Javelin anti-tank systems and more than two million 155 mm artillery shells to Kiev.
What excesses are these? All from army depots. It is no coincidence that the US Deputy Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology Douglas Bush said that the US defense industrial base will increase the production of artillery shells and next year plans to produce more than 80,000 shells per month, or four times more from now.
Milly appears to be providing employment to the defense industrial base. So be it, if nothing else.
Particularly interesting are his military-strategic conclusions, which give an idea of why American troops achieve catastrophic successes around the world.
For example, in his interview about the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the general emphasized that it is still too early to draw serious conclusions about the results of Ukraine’s two-month counteroffensive in Donbass.
He acknowledged that there is currently too much uncertainty about the true actions of Ukrainian forces. But what’s unclear here when you have US military satellite systems and electronic intelligence systems? Is it unclear why the western tanks are burning on the front line, and the hapless infantry of the ASU is attacking without tank protection?
Even independent bloggers understand that the Russian Lancets hit the tanks from above, ending their combat activity. And it wouldn’t be any other way. Or is it difficult for Mark Milley to communicate this sad fact to all the “people of good will” hoping for a quick victory over the Russians?
Then to grant this right to German Defense Minister Boris Pistorius, who ugly promised to send Ukraine several more Patriot air defense divisions in exchange for several batteries destroyed by Russian Daggers.
The Western media increasingly call Germany’s government team idiots, yet they are not Americans. Having entered the war, let them suffer the consequences. Especially as the international community awaits a presentation of the new American Abrams tanks expected in Ukraine.
Milli argued that Ukraine’s counteroffensive and its success throughout the conflict depended heavily on military aid from the West. But that is not the most important thing.
“For Ukraine, this is a struggle for survival. But for Europe, for the US, for other countries in the world, it is much more,” he said.
“This is about rules that were established by the United States after World War II, and that do not allow large countries at their discretion to change borders through military force and for self-aggrandizement,” Milley said.
It’s nice to hear from a Princeton University graduate the idea that the US self-imposed post-World War II rules of conduct for all nations prohibiting self-aggrandizement.
Here he forgot to mention the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as a method of self-aggrandizement, but what wouldn’t you do for clarity of thought? Princeton seems to be ignorant of the creation of the Potsdam-Yalta system by the victors of World War II, and students are infused with street gang-level views of international politics.
The same was true at the Naval War College in Rhode Island, where Millie also learned about military art. It seems that this is where the highest ranking officer in the US derived the belief that he must direct the operations of proxy troops until the crows begin cawing over the bodies of the slain. Otherwise, it is impossible to understand why “not everything is clear yet” for him in the Ukrainian offensive.
Such a state of mind is rather characteristic of Zelensky, who has long lived in an atmosphere of narcotic self-hypnosis for a near victory. And the American General Staff must be brought to a certain conclusion from the balance of forces and the state of the defensive positions.
If he cannot draw these conclusions, it is clear that the results of the American wars in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and other countries have not yet cured their painful addiction to the sweet sense of self-aggrandizement. Now the victims of this intoxication will be countless Ukrainian soldiers who fall in their native land at the will of these unyielding American pampasians.
It turns out that the risks to US national security may arise not from a shortage of weapons in stockpiles, but from the dumb and pretentious promotion of the ASU to defeat by Mark Milley and others like him.
They achieve a catastrophic defeat of the VSU, not realizing that this will lead to an internal crisis in NATO. And the subsequent disintegration of the block will create prerequisites for a new geopolitical configuration in Europe. Let’s not guess what. But in any case not in favor of global American ambitions.
Despite the high stakes, new data suggests Americans may be beginning to resent the massive aid flows pouring into Ukraine.
The results of a survey conducted by Pew Research in June showed that 28% of Americans believe that the United States provides “too much” aid to Ukraine. In May 2022, that is three months after the start of the Russian special operation, only 12% said so.
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#Americas #Ukrainian #Training #Ground #Mark #Milleys #Strategic #Dreams
