–
The greeting of the Turkish President Erdogan with US President Joe Biden seems almost submissive with a “fist bump”. But the impression is deceptive. Erdogan took out a billion-dollar loan in China before the meeting, despite the US warning of such dependencies.
© dpa
Who and what can you still rely on? Vladimir Putin is forcibly drawing new borders, imprisoning dissidents or having them killed. Nevertheless, the NATO ally Turkey buys weapons systems from him. Head of state Erdogan gets one before meeting Joe Biden Milliardenkredit in China, as if he wanted to sabotage the G7’s warning of such dependence. How does the West intend to contain Beijing in the face of such allies?
From Trump to Biden: Allianz is taking off again
Here, too, the western democracies need time to move from ad hoc measures against the new dangers to a systematic response. Current main threats such as cyber weapons and climate change will only appear in NATO’s future strategic concept. In the old one of 2010 they were still missing, Russia was a partner and China was not a strategic challenge.
Thanks to Trump’s move to Biden, Europeans and Americans are back on their feet. Four years of Trump taught them that the more united they act, the greater their security. Trust in the reliability of the partner is the key resource. NATO is alive again, that was felt at the summit.
[Jeden Donnerstag die wichtigsten Entwicklungen aus Amerika direkt ins Postfach – mit dem Newsletter „Washington Weekly“ unserer USA-Korrespondentin Juliane Schäuble. Hier geht es zur kostenlosen Anmeldung]
As with Corona, the rapid countermeasures also helped to prevent worse security issues. Air traffic was safe again shortly after 9/11. The sanctions imposed by the West after the occupation of Crimea and eastern Ukraine in 2014 have deterred Putin from further wars of conquest. They are not a permanent solution. Biden will talk to Putin about common interests: the limits of cyberattacks, nuclear disarmament, the Iran deal.
Withdrawal from Afghanistan and new priorities
Other responses to attacks have turned out to be costly mistakes, such as NATO’s military intervention in Afghanistan after 9/11. NATO is now ending it largely unsuccessfully and fearing that the Taliban will soon take power again.
At the same time, the concept for the future is now taking shape. G7 and NATO currently do not define security issues primarily in military terms, but as a question of economic, technical and alliance-political superiority. Sure, the military has to be strong enough to deter potential adversaries. Incidentally, China is not one of them for NATO; it wants to remain a transatlantic alliance.