Home » today » World » Alex Cotoia Killed His Violent Father, Cassation’s Twist: There Will Be a New Trial

Alex Cotoia Killed His Violent Father, Cassation’s Twist: There Will Be a New Trial

First harmless as a result of he solely defended himself, then responsible as a result of he wished to kill the violent father. And now, as soon as once more, the destiny of Alex Cotoia, the younger man who, at simply 18 years outdated, on April 30, 2020, killed Joseph Pump inflicting 34 stab wounds with six completely different knives. This was established by the Court docket of Cassation which accepted the attraction of the protection, supported by the legal professionals Claudio Strata ed Henry Grossbut in addition that of the Legal professional Normal Marco Dall’Olio who within the listening to had requested to redo the second diploma judgment criticizing the explanations for the conviction. “We’re very comfortable. We had an preliminary crucial suggestions from the final prosecutor who in his written closing assertion had spoken of a ‘poor’ attraction sentence and who right this moment argued with appreciable ardour proving us proper” commented Strata.

In keeping with the lawyer normal, there had the truth is been “a sensational reversal”, which was not acceptable. Alex’s was “a case of media relevance”, which brought on dialogue. The boy the truth is at all times maintained that he had taken the lifetime of the guardian who had been mistreating his spouse for years, on the finish of a violent argument triggered by his obsessive jealousy, in any other case “he would have killed us all”. The prosecutor had believed this reconstruction Court docket of Assisiwhich had acquitted him. However within the second diploma he had as an alternative been discovered accountable for voluntary murder, and for this sentenced to six years, 2 months and 20 days.

Alex, the boy who killed his violent father to defend his mom, sentenced to six years

by Sarah Martinenghi


The prosecutor’s thesis is that the second sentence was missing in motivation and had “a content material that was merely harmful in comparison with the primary occasion sentence”: “it doesn’t present a reconstruction of the occasion in any respect, a lot much less a substitute for that of the primary occasion decide” defined the Justice of the Peace representing the prosecution the truth is. Cassation. There’s a “strident, irreconcilable logical contradiction” claims the prosecutor. If the truth is April 30 was “a day of unusual home violence (merely verbal)” and it’s assumed that “this example was simply manageable provided that the daddy was now disqualified and that the kids had assumed the position of ‘bodyguards’ for the mom”, then “it isn’t attainable to know on the reconstruction stage what triggered Alex’s conduct” provided that amongst different issues “in dozens of different related earlier events he had by no means exceeded”, that’s, he had not reacted to the violence with violence. To reveal the intense mistreatment to which the household was subjected, the protection had performed lots of of stunning recordings within the courtroom, by which the daddy screamed, insulted and threatened them. Alex had the truth is been deemed partially incompetent exactly due to the implications of getting lived in such a horrible context: “each night time earlier than going to sleep I hugged my mom pondering that he may kill her and that the subsequent day I might by no means see her once more” the boy had declared in courtroom. For the lawyer normal, nonetheless, the recordings weren’t considered by the attraction judges, and subsequently they didn’t even think about that that night time there had been a “critical menace from the daddy”.

the explanations for the sentence

“Alex killed his father with six knives and 34 stabs, he can not have acted in self-defense”

Sarah Martinenghi



Briefly, based on the Legal professional Normal, the sentence “was cautious to not analyze or has largely underestimated many procedural information considered by the first-instance judgment”. For instance, the testimonies of the mom and brother within the first trial had been thought-about dependable, whereas on attraction they weren’t, a lot in order that the paperwork had been despatched to the prosecutor’s workplace for “false testimony”: based on the Justice of the Peace, the explanation for such a reversal isn’t sufficiently defined. Moreover, there have been “shortcomings within the investigations” by the investigators “which don’t permit us to reconstruct the conduct of the person protagonists contained in the condominium in With wooden”: the lawyer normal doesn’t agree that for the attraction these shortcomings are “irrelevant”. It should be famous that “the well being employees who intervened contaminated the crime scene and simply as many anomalies and omissions had been verified by the police”, who for instance had not discovered “each hint”, or didn’t “purchase the garments of the accused’s brother”. However all these components “can not in any manner be assessed in opposition to the accused”.

Alex’s reality in a podcast: “I am sorry, the burden I carry is sort of a life sentence”

by Sarah Martinenghi



Through the attraction proceedings the judges had turned to the Session why the reform Cartabia on the purple code made it inconceivable to use in a prevalent manner some mitigating circumstances that Alex deserved on the annoying circumstance of getting killed a relative, specifically his father. The rule had been reformed by the Constitutional Court docket and so the defendant had been capable of acknowledge the semi-mental infirmity and the mitigating circumstance of provocation and the generic ones, resulting in reducing the sentence to simply over 6 years. “Alex isn’t an avenger, he has at all times had behaviors which were reconstructed by the testimonies of his mom and brother and the recordings entered into the trial – the lawyer highlighted Claudio StrataAlex’s lawyer in his speech earlier than the supreme judges – That was an off-scale, anomalous night, that night an atomic bomb exploded. The attraction decide didn’t refute the arguments underlying the first-instance sentence”. Now a brand new Court docket of Assizes of Enchantment will consider what occurred that night: Alex’s future can as soon as once more be rewritten.

#Alex #Cotoia #Killed #Violent #Father #Cassations #Twist #Trial
– 2024-07-05 17:50:37

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.