Table of Contents
- 1 Alessandro Basciano leaves prison, the lawyer: “File evidence that exonerates him”
- 2 Basciano: “Whoever lied will pay”
- 3 **To what extent should social media platforms be held accountable for the potential spread of misinformation and harassment that can impact legal proceedings, as seen in the Alessandro Basciano case?**
Alessandro Basciano leaves prison. The detention of the DJ and influencer who ended up in San Vittore lasted only 24 hours. Basciano was sentenced to prison for stalking and threats against his ex-girlfriend Sophie Codegoni, whom he met on Big Brother, but the order was revoked thanks to some messages that “they overturn the accusation“.
Alessandro Basciano leaves prison, the lawyer: “File evidence that exonerates him”
Alessandro Basciano leaves prison after 24 hours. The lawyer of the 35-year-old from Genoa has “provided his detailed and detailed version of the facts, denying that he had ever used physical violence against his ex-partner“.
From the chats between Basciano and Codegoni, in the days preceding the rumored attack on two friends of the 24-year-old in via della Moscova, it transpires “a relationship between the two certainly not characterized by a state of fear and/or fear on the part of Codegoni towards her ex-partner“.
The order underlines another element that emerged from the reconstruction provided by the lawyer, namely the message with which Codegoni “after accepting a precious gift from the suspect (a Chanel bag worth 10 thousand euros, ed.) and a letter addressed to her, she expresses emotion and carries out a series of considerations on their previous relationship, also referring to ‘guilt and mutual responsibilities“. All of this, we read in the document “it seems not very compatible with disturbance and fear“.
So does the lawyer Leonardo D’Erasmo after revocation: “We have filed evidence that exonerates him from Codegoni’s accusations. We disavowed all of Sophie’s accusations one by one, the judge was also aware that she had dismissed the complaint and when this morning the defense produced elements to the contrary, the judge was aware of the reality and revoked the measure“. Also specifying that Basciano “he won’t go under house arrest, he won’t have an electronic bracelet and he hasn’t even received an approach ban“.
Basciano: “Whoever lied will pay”
A few hours after his release, the influencer returned to social media with a fiery message: “Justice has been done, in the sense that my non-involvement in the facts is now clear. From the order ordering the revocation of the precautionary measure, it emerges that the lies are coming to the surface. Now those who lied will pay the consequences in the appropriate places. Soon I will have you read the papers, thanks to my lawyer for the excellent work done“.
## World Today News Exclusive Interview: The Alessandro Basciano Case
**Welcome back to World Today News. Today, we delve into the complex case of Alessandro Basciano, the DJ and influencer recently released from prison after only 24 hours. Joining us are legal expert Ms. Luna Rodriguez and social media commentator Mr. David Chen. Welcome to you both.**
**Part 1: The Legal Landscape**
**Host:** Ms. Rodriguez, the order revoking Basciano’s detention hinged on messages presented by his lawyer. How significant is the role of digital evidence in cases like this, where accusations hinge heavily on interpersonal relationships?
**Ms. Rodriguez:** *Digital evidence is increasingly crucial in modern legal cases, especially those involving accusations of stalking and threats. Text messages, emails, and social media posts can provide invaluable insights into the dynamics of a relationship, revealing potential inconsistencies or biases in an accuser’s narrative.*
**Host:** Mr. Chen, from a legal perspective, how does the concept of “reasonable doubt” apply in this situation? Do you think the available evidence was sufficient to warrant Basciano’s initial arrest and detention?
**Mr. Chen:** *The principle of “reasonable doubt” is paramount. However, in high-profile cases like this, public opinion and social media pressures can sometimes overshadow legal proceedings. Whether the initial evidence was sufficient is debatable, but the swift revocation suggests that there were significant flaws in the prosecution’s case.*
**Part 2: Social Media and Public Perception**
**Host:** Mr. Chen, Basciano took to social media immediately after his release, stating “those who lied will pay” and promising to reveal “the papers.” How do you see this public outburst impacting the ongoing legal process and public perception of the case?
**Mr. Chen:** *Basciano’s post is a calculated move to control the narrative. He’s directly addressing his followers, portraying himself as a victim and casting doubt on Sophie Codegoni’s accusations. Social media can be a powerful tool for influencing public opinion, but it also carries the risk of bias and misinformation.
**Host:** Ms. Rodriguez, do you think social media platforms bear any responsibility in cases where online accusations can lead to legal repercussions for both parties involved?
**Ms. Rodriguez:** *Social media platforms undoubtedly play a role in shaping public discourse and influencing perceptions of guilt or innocence. They have a responsibility to address the spread of misinformation and online harassment, ensuring that users are aware of the potential legal ramifications of their online actions.*
**Part 3: Looking Ahead**
**Host:** Ms. Rodriguez, what could be the potential legal ramifications for Sophie Codegoni, given Basciano’s accusations of lying?
**Ms. Rodriguez:** *If Basciano can prove Codegoni made knowingly false accusations, she could face charges of defamation or even perjury. However, the burden of proof lies with Basciano, who needs to provide substantial evidence to support his claims.*
**Host:** Mr. Chen, what message does this case send about the complexities of navigating relationships and accusations in the age of social media?
**Mr. Chen:** *This case underscores the need for caution and critical thinking when consuming information online. Accusations, even those made publicly, should be treated with skepticism until all sides of the story are heard and verified. It also highlights the power dynamics at play when public figures are involved in interpersonal conflicts.*
**Host: Thank you both for sharing your insights. This is a complex case that will likely continue to unfold in the media and the court of law. Stay tuned to World Today News for further developments.* **
