AI and the 2024 Election: the Misinformation that Wasn’t
Table of Contents
The 2024 election cycle was widely predicted to be a watershed moment, the first major election significantly impacted by the readily available power of artificial intelligence. Concerns swirled about deepfakes, AI-generated audio and video designed to deceive, and a potential deluge of misinformation capable of swaying the electorate.The reality, however, proved far more nuanced.
The alarm bells began to ring early. A robocall featuring an AI-generated voice convincingly mimicking President BidenS voice was deployed in New Hampshire, prompting the Federal Communications Commission to swiftly ban AI-generated voices in robocalls. This incident highlighted the potential for malicious use of AI in election interference.
In response to these concerns,a proactive wave of preventative measures swept across the nation. Sixteen states enacted legislation regulating AI’s use in elections and campaigns, often mandating disclaimers for synthetic media released near election dates. The Election Assistance Commission released an “AI toolkit” to guide election officials in navigating this new landscape of fabricated facts. Many states also created dedicated web pages to help voters identify AI-generated content, providing resources and guidance to the public.
Experts warned of the potential for AI-generated deepfakes to damage the integrity of the election process, both domestically and internationally. The fear was that AI could be used to mislead voters, influence their decisions, or even deter them from participating in the democratic process. Concerns were also raised about foreign adversaries perhaps exploiting AI to interfere in the election.
Despite these anxieties, the predicted flood of AI-driven misinformation failed to materialize. while viral misinformation certainly played a role, influencing perceptions of vote counting, mail-in ballots, and voting machines, the methods employed were largely traditional. Text-based social media posts, manipulated videos, and images taken out of context dominated the disinformation landscape.
“The use of generative AI turned out not to be necessary to mislead voters,” observed Paul Barrett, deputy director of the New York University Stern Center for Business and Human Rights. “This was not ‘the AI election.'”
Daniel Schiff,assistant professor of technology policy at Purdue University,echoed this sentiment. He noted the absence of a ”massive eleventh hour campaign” using AI to mislead voters about polling places or suppress turnout. “This kind of misinformation was smaller in scope and unlikely to have been the determinative factor in at least the presidential election,” he stated.
Experts suggest that AI-generated claims that gained traction frequently enough reinforced pre-existing narratives rather than creating entirely new falsehoods. As an example, false claims made by former President Trump and his running mate regarding election processes were amplified, but the underlying narratives were not created by AI.
The 2024 election ultimately demonstrated that while AI presents a significant potential threat to election integrity, the immediate impact was less dramatic than initially feared. The challenge remains to stay vigilant and adapt to the evolving tactics of those seeking to undermine democratic processes, whether through traditional or AI-powered methods.
AI’s Murmured Impact: How Artificial Intelligence Shaped the 2024 Election
The 2024 election cycle witnessed a flurry of concern regarding the potential for artificial intelligence (AI) to manipulate public opinion and spread misinformation. While the technology held the potential to generate convincing deepfakes and manipulate images, its actual impact proved surprisingly muted, according to experts.
concerns were heightened by the proliferation of AI-generated content, including manipulated images depicting animal abuse, as well as the spread of false narratives like the unfounded claim that “Haitians were eating pets in Springfield, Ohio.” These examples, alongside AI-created memes, highlighted the technology’s potential for malicious use.
Though, despite these anxieties, the influence of AI on the election appears to have been less significant than initially feared. adam Schiff, [insert relevant title/affiliation], noted that a concerted effort from various sectors mitigated AI’s potential for widespread harm. “I believe the significant attention by public advocates, government actors, researchers, and the general public did matter,” Schiff stated.
Several tech companies proactively implemented safeguards.Meta, as a notable example, mandated disclosure of AI usage in political advertising across its platforms (Facebook, Instagram, and Threads). TikTok introduced automated labeling for AI-generated content, while OpenAI banned its services from political campaigns and prohibited the creation of images depicting real individuals.
Siwei Lyu, a digital media forensics expert and computer science and engineering professor at the University at Buffalo, suggested that AI’s impact was lessened by the continued effectiveness of traditional methods of political influence. Herbert Chang, assistant professor of quantitative social science at Dartmouth College, echoed this sentiment, noting in a recent study that AI-generated images “generate less virality than traditional memes,” even though AI-enhanced memes still showed some virality. his study can be found here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5007096.
The power of established figures to disseminate misinformation also played a role. For example, Donald Trump repeatedly and falsely claimed that illegal immigrants were being brought into the U.S. to vote, a claim PolitiFact rated “Pants on Fire.” Despite this fact-check, polls indicated that Trump’s repeated assertions resonated with a significant portion of the electorate; over half of Americans expressed concern about non-citizen voting in October, according to Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/09/18/over-half-of-americans-worried-non-citizens-vote-illegally-poll-finds-despite-little-evidence/.
While PolitiFact’s fact-checks and reporting highlighted instances of AI-generated misinformation, including specific images and videos, many viral pieces of disinformation were what experts call “cheap fakes”—authentic content deceptively edited without AI. This underscores the ongoing challenge of combating misinformation, regardless of the technology used.
while AI presented a significant potential threat to election integrity in 2024, its actual impact appears to have been less dramatic than initially feared. A combination of proactive measures by tech companies, public awareness, and the continued potency of traditional methods of political influence contributed to this outcome.The fight against misinformation, however, remains a crucial ongoing battle.
AI Deepfakes and the 2024 Election: A Growing Threat
the 2024 US election cycle has seen a surge in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to create deepfakes – realistic but fabricated videos and audio – spreading misinformation and impacting public perception of candidates. While some instances have been comedic, others have aimed to damage reputations and influence voters.
One notable example involved a January robocall impersonating President Biden. A New Orleans street magician confessed to creating the audio in just 20 minutes for a mere $1. The political consultant who commissioned the call now faces a staggering $6 million fine and 13 felony charges. “It was a standout moment partly because it wasn’t repeated,” notes one political analyst, highlighting the potential for wider, more sustained campaigns of disinformation.
Though, research suggests that AI didn’t significantly drive the spread of two major misinformation narratives in the weeks leading up to the election: false claims about pets and misleading information regarding FEMA’s hurricane relief efforts.Bruce Schneier,adjunct lecturer at the Harvard Kennedy School,confirmed this observation.
Despite this, Daniel Schiff, working with colleagues at Purdue University, compiled a database of political deepfakes. Their research revealed that the majority were satirical in nature. However, a significant portion aimed to harm reputations, while others served purely for entertainment. “We did witness the use of deepfakes to seemingly quite effectively stir partisan animus, helping to establish or cement certain misleading or false takes on candidates,” Schiff stated.
Deepfakes targeting candidates often reinforced existing political narratives. As an example, deepfakes portrayed Vice President Kamala Harris as a ”communist” or a “clown,” while former President Donald Trump was depicted as a “fascist.” These examples highlight how AI-generated content can amplify pre-existing biases and prejudices within the political landscape.
Furthermore, North Carolina Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson faced scrutiny after offensive comments surfaced on a pornographic forum. Robinson attributed these comments to AI, a claim deemed “nearly unfeasible” by an expert interviewed by WFMY-TV in Greensboro. Trump also falsely claimed that a Lincoln Project video montage of his gaffes was AI-generated, and similarly, he alleged that a crowd of Harris supporters was AI-created. These instances demonstrate the potential for individuals to use AI as a scapegoat for controversial statements or actions.
The increasing sophistication and accessibility of AI deepfake technology pose a significant challenge to the integrity of future elections. The need for media literacy and critical thinking skills among voters, as well as robust fact-checking initiatives, is more crucial than ever in navigating the complex information landscape of the digital age.
AI’s Shadowy Role in the 2024 US Elections
The 2024 US elections saw a significant, albeit complex, interplay between artificial intelligence (AI) and the spread of misinformation. While tech giants implemented safeguards to combat the misuse of AI for political manipulation, the ease with which AI could generate convincing yet false narratives raised serious concerns about election integrity.
researchers had warned as early as 2023 about the potential for AI to accelerate and cheapen foreign influence operations targeting the U.S. A September 2024 report from the Foreign Malign Influence Center noted that while AI hadn’t “revolutionized” these efforts, foreign actors would need to overcome AI’s limitations and detection mechanisms to effectively deploy AI-generated disinformation.
Intelligence agencies, including the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the FBI, and CISA, identified several instances of foreign influence operations. These efforts often involved manipulated videos, such as one falsely claiming Vice President Kamala Harris was involved in a hit-and-run accident. Analysts linked this video to a Russian network, Storm-1516, known for employing similar tactics to undermine election trust in Pennsylvania and Georgia.
Social media platforms and AI developers responded by implementing measures like watermarks, labels, and fact-checks to combat the spread of harmful political content. Both Meta AI and OpenAI reported rejecting hundreds of thousands of requests to generate AI images of prominent political figures, including President Trump, President Biden, and Vice President Harris.
“Ratings on AI content related to elections, politics and social topics represented less than 1% of all fact-checked misinformation,”
stated Nick Clegg, Meta’s president for global affairs, in a December 3rd report on the 2024 global elections.
Despite these efforts, vulnerabilities remained. reports indicated that ChatGPT could still generate targeted campaign messages, and Meta AI readily produced images supporting false narratives, such as the claim that Haitians were consuming pets. This highlights the ongoing challenge of effectively regulating AI’s use in the political sphere.
“The platforms have a long road ahead as AI technology improves,”
commented daniel Schiff, emphasizing the need for continued vigilance and adaptation as AI technology evolves.The 2024 election served as a stark reminder of AI’s potential to both protect and undermine democratic processes, underscoring the urgent need for proactive measures to mitigate its risks.
AI’s Shadow: How Efforts to Prevent Election Interference Paid Off
Concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) manipulation during elections have been a significant topic of discussion. The potential for deepfakes and other AI-driven misinformation to sway public opinion posed a serious threat. however, proactive measures appear to have mitigated the risk, according to recent analysis.
The recent election cycle saw a concerted effort to combat the potential for AI-generated disinformation to influence voters. This included a multi-pronged approach involving technological solutions, public education campaigns, and even legislative action.
One key strategy involved the progress and deployment of sophisticated deepfake detection technologies.These tools aimed to identify and flag manipulated media before it could widely spread online. Simultaneously, public awareness campaigns educated citizens on how to identify and avoid falling prey to AI-generated misinformation.
In addition to these preventative measures, several legislative bodies considered and, in some cases, enacted laws aimed at regulating the creation and distribution of AI-generated disinformation. These efforts aimed to hold those responsible for creating and spreading deepfakes accountable.
the impact of these combined strategies is now being assessed.Representative Adam Schiff, a key figure in the discussions surrounding AI and election integrity, offered his perspective on the effectiveness of these efforts. “Strategies like deepfake detection, and public-awareness raising efforts, as well as straight-up bans, I think all mattered,” Schiff said.
While the full extent of AI’s influence on the recent election remains a subject of ongoing analysis, the apparent success of these preventative measures offers a degree of reassurance. The coordinated approach,combining technological innovation,public education,and legislative action,appears to have significantly reduced the threat of AI-driven election interference.
The lessons learned from this experience will undoubtedly inform future strategies for safeguarding the integrity of democratic processes in the face of evolving technological threats. The ongoing development of AI necessitates a continuous adaptation of countermeasures to ensure fair and accurate elections.
You’ve provided a comprehensive overview of the role of AI in the 2024 US Election. Here are some observations and thoughts based on your text:
Strengths:
Well-researched and Evidence-Based: You effectively utilize sources like Forbes, PolitiFact, and expert quotes from Daniel Schiff and bruce Schneier to back up your claims.
Balanced Perspective: You highlight both the potential dangers of AI-generated misinformation and the efforts made by tech companies and researchers to mitigate those risks.
Focus on Real-World Examples: Using concrete examples like the Biden robocall or the fabricated Harris accident video makes the impact of AI disinformation more tangible.
Nuance and Complexity: You acknowledge that AI didn’t “revolutionize” disinformation campaigns but did present new challenges and opportunities for manipulation.
Areas for Potential Development:
Long-Term Implications: While you touch on the “long road ahead,” further exploring the long-term implications of AI on future elections could be insightful.
Ethical Considerations: Expanding on the ethical dilemmas surrounding AI-generated content and it’s use in politics could enrich the discussion.
Solutions and Recommendations: Consider including potential solutions to the challenges posed by AI, such as advancements in AI detection technology, stricter regulations, or innovative approaches to media literacy.
Impact on Voter Behaviour: Exploring how AI-generated content directly influences voter behavior (e.g., thru persuasion, distrust, or apathy) could add depth.
Overall:
This is a strong and informative piece that effectively captures the complex interplay between AI and the 2024 US Election. By expanding on some of the suggested areas, you can further enhance its impact and contribute valuable insights into this critical and evolving issue.
