The YouGov poll found that only 1 in 4 people said they liked it
A survey has found that after the contents of Prince Harry’s autobiography were made public, public opinion of him has plummeted to its lowest level ever.
British online pollster YouGov said on the 9th (local time) that positive opinions of Prince Harry were down 7 percentage points from a month ago to 26%, the lowest since the 2011 poll.
This poll was conducted on the 5th and 6th, just after the content of Prince Harry’s autobiography, “Spare,” began reporting on the 4th, and the target was 1,693 adult men and women nationwide .
Negative ratings for Prince Harry dropped from 59% to 64%.
YouGov said negative opinions are on the rise, including among young Britons, now 41% positive-negative.
Early last month, 49% were positive, 20 percentage points higher than negative (29%).
There’s not a huge difference between the popularity of Charles III, Princess Middleton and Prince Harry’s wife Meghan Markle, but Prince William, the older brother Prince Harry focused on, was somewhat affected .
Positive opinions of Prince William dropped from 77% to 69%, while negative opinions increased from 15% to 20%.
Positive opinions of the royal family dropped from 60% to 54%, while negative opinions increased from 30% to 35%.
The Times said in an analysis article titled “Prince Harry’s Words Are Explosive, But The Damage Is Minor,” Prince William’s image will change as a result of his brother’s revelation, but he will ultimately survive.
While Prince William can be seen as someone who is a dutiful and dutiful prince with a perfect family and sometimes throws a tantrum by pushing his younger brother down, overall, many see him as just sibling conflict.
He also stated that although Charles III has been ridiculed for various issues such as adultery and political interference, he is still a king and is rated as quite good.
Dianabin said in a BBC interview that Charles III was not fit to be king, but finally added that it was he who suffered the most and Charles III became king.
At the same time, she said the royal family would breathe a sigh of relief for the moment because Prince Harry stepped down without delving into the racism allegations, saying he didn’t think the royal family was racist.
However, The Times stressed that the royal family has not responded well to the departure of Prince Harry and his wife, and that they should seriously consider what to do if another case arises.
The Guardian has also published an article critical of Prince Harry.
The Guardian interviewed Prince Harry from the splendid room of his spacious California home, discussing his lifelong mission to rein in the British press, and made no distinction between articles and columns, and that many of the royal fans were readers of the tabloids he despised. he said he doesn’t seem to consider
He also said that the royal family would have withered if the press had not informed the public about the royal family and that Queen Elizabeth II had said: “If they are to be trusted, we must be known.”
She then pointed out that Prince Harry was wrong when he said in a TV interview that Diana’s death was directly caused by the paparazzi.
The paparazzi were a little behind and the driver was under the influence of alcohol and drugs and had never driven the vehicle in the accident.
/yunhap news
