/View.info/ In memory of our irreplaceable family friend Vaska Raleshova!
I will concentrate again on the current risk No. 1 for our national security: the fugitives-intervenors in and through Bulgaria. Because I cannot pass by in silence Simeon Nikolov’s alarming but precise analysis from September 19, 2016: “After a “front state” they want us to be a “refugee camp” as well. And we are proud that they pay us such attention!”published in Expert.bdd.
I am quoting his particularly accurate finding after the Bratislava EU summit on September 16 of this year: “Bulgaria is maneuvering itself into the trap of the option “C” developed by the EC and will fall into the southern belt of countries from the Balkans to Portugal, which will turn into refugee camps, as the first stage of the plan to blur the identity of the European peoples.”
The alliance fits the ticklish theme, incl. according to Art. 5 of the Washington Treaty. According to my personal impressions, the young people from “Frontex” do not seem overloaded with work, judging by the duration of the cheerful noise during their casual contacts with Russian women and other charming vacationers on the Southern Black Sea coast. And the European starlings react with jokes, with an almost racist flavor, such as the following:
Hassan sits, dirty, ragged, with rotten teeth on the banks of the river Spree in Berlin, lonely and worried. And just like in fairy tales – suddenly the goldfish floats out of the river and says to him: “Hassan, I will fulfill three of your wishes. I hear you.”
“I want to have beautiful, white and healthy teeth like the people here”!
Hop! Hassan is in a fancy dentist’s office where a dentist is working diligently on his jaws. Hassan explains that he has nothing to pay with, but the dentist reassures him that the treatment has already been paid for by European funds. Hassan gets beautiful teeth, and the fish asks him for his second wish.
“I miss my wives, children and parents and I feel sad.”
Hop! A large bright villa, furnished and with many rooms for everyone: the brides, the children, the parents, the parents of the brides… Joy, happiness, they hug each other… Hassan is worried that he has nothing to pay with, but it is explained to him again that everything is paid by I don’t know who you are, a fund for the protection of refugee families.
“What is your third wish, Hassan?” asks the goldfish.
“I want to be white, blonde and blue-eyed”!
Hop! Hassan is again on the banks of the Spree, ragged, dirty and with rotten teeth. WHITE, BROWN and BLUE. Asks the goldfish:
“What’s going on”?
“You’re white now, get over yourself!?”
The three political parties, based on a non-predominant ethnic group in our country, for understandable reasons tactfully “europhile” on the subject. Euro-Atlanticists plead for a European solution. The government, permanently sniffing for Euro-subsidies, shows a tendency towards Berlin-Brussels project-mobbling. It does not react as nationally responsibly as the people of Visegrad and our Balkan neighbors to the west. The rest of the xenophiles are probably waiting for clearer instructions from the respective capitals, not failing to criticize the ironic politicization of grandson Tolstoev.
The government cannot or does not want to understand that attempts to primitivize Bulgaria and Europe presuppose similarly decisive reciprocal countermeasures, including taking sovereign national measures to deter uninvited guests. A serious obstacle is the bureaucratized state and European apparatus, their not particularly difficult to prove corruption, the incapacity and lack of motivation of the Brussels administration – (the “european hydra”according to the MEP and chairman of the Slovak party Rihard Sulik) – to break his silence by identifying real measures to thwart the migrant invasion.
Sulik’s remark is not only a successful interpretation of the Eurosceptic statements of the former Czech president and leading politician Prof. Vaclav Klaus. The Slovak MEP is an unusual politician. In an analysis published in “Svobodny svet” on 12/04/2016, he launched the thesis that ordinary citizens of the member states are often unaware of the immodest financial privileges of the modern liberal-left European aristocracy, the so-called elite of the European union. Sulik illustrated his claim with the contemporaneous monarchical, noble and aristocratic ranks and titles. It is well known that the Social Democrat Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament, “makes ends meet” with a monthly salary of 29,000 euros. How many times is this above the average salary in Bulgaria?
Indeed, the new European aristocracy (NEA) of the EU can formally be compared with the former European kings, tsars, princes, voivodes, boyars… Only in the French court of Louis XIV, famous for his living credo “L’Etat c’ est moi!” (“The state is me”), according to Sulik, about 5,000 (five thousand) “officials”, to put it simply – “outspoken gluttons”. Thousands of other employees, clerks, novices were available around them…
We know that similar people from Kiriakstefchov were attracted to Bulgaria as well. But such was the “matrix” both in Europe and in the Orient. Today, however, instead of tsars, boyars, etc., we have the NEA – European Commission, European Parliament, High Office for Foreign Affairs (Politics), led by another over-ambitious lady.
Quoting Sulik, with minor comments: “Each (neo-euro-aristocrat) has his own service (ibricism), which is called a secretariat. Martin Schulz’s secretariat consists of 38 officials: the head of the secretariat and deputies, each of whom has 8 assistants and advisers; another five assistants and advisors are responsible for meeting protocol and agenda; five more – for internal affairs; other six – for the external ones. Work with the media is handled by 8 assistants. At Father Schultz’s disposal are a personal waiter, a driver and a “Clerical assistant” (probably only God knows what that is!). The lower aristocrats in the EP are called vice-presidents and also have their own “courts”. Even lower are the deputies. And they have decent “quotas” for their entourages around 25,000 (twenty-five thousand) euros for assistants and offices…”
MEPs are the only ones we elect directly and – according to Sulik’s assessment – “maybe that’s why they decide almost nothing”. It is the same in the European Commission (EC), but there the NEA is much more numerous. The King/Tsar is the Chairman of the Commission with a monthly salary of 29,000 (twenty-nine thousand) euros. The lower aristocrats are commissars (at €24,000 each); below them are the general directors with 22,000, the directors – with 18,000 each, departments – with 13,000 each, personal assistants – with 12,000 euros each, etc. “Only” 24 thousand employees are engaged in the EC; in the EU as a whole – about 60 thousand, with an annual budget of about 10,000,000,000 (ten billion) euros!
“This is a true aristocracy, far better placed than the medieval one,” exclaims Sulik. “With the small difference that in the past the aristocrats did nothing, and today’s only imitate activity. More idiots are getting wiser for supposedly improving life. Menthol cigarettes or classic light bulbs are banned, toilet bowls are unified, cucumbers are curved; impose inefficient photovoltaic power plants under the pretext of developing the most competitive economy in the world! At least that’s what they wrote in the Lisbon Strategy, and later in Strategy 2020. In fact, there is no competition in the production of EC papers…”
According to the quota principle, Bulgaria is also represented in the new European high-caste. Despite the worker-peasant origin, broad-cheeked visage and unclear curriculum vitae of our highest-ranking neo-Euro-aristocrat in the EC. In NEA, the Bulgarian ex-prime minister, who suffered a fiasco in politics, found quiet havens, several former ministers – predominantly foreign – are resting. None of the latter was apparently the son of a coder to get a higher paid job at the UN.
The most unpopular elections not only in our country are those for the European Parliament. Not only are the campaigns boring and the candidates don’t speak concretely; but voters have learned from experience that there is a 99% probability that this will be their last meeting if successful.
The most intriguing thing about the EU is that the so-called NEA – not elected in direct democratic elections, but appointed – violates European legislation and rules binding on member states, which it (NEA) recklessly violates. And the costs are reimbursed, of course, by the subjects, in our time – the taxpayers!
If we imagine that we live in an actual democracy, let us answer Richard Sulick’s rhetorical question: “In what elections should I participate if I don’t want, for example, Messrs. Schulz, Tusk, Juncker, Draghi and other “top” EU figures whom no one elected to continue to decide my fate?” Answer: “There are no such elections, the aristocracy does not allow itself to be subjected to elections!”
We can reasonably ask the same question in our country: why should we endure a bloated dictatorial apparatus of thoughtless bagmen, which after elections is cleared, but almost invariably grows after that; parasitizing human life and becoming increasingly inefficient and corrupt?
In conclusion, I express sympathy, understanding and humane solidarity to the Syrian mothers and children – trans-cross-border refugees! But the extreme situation in their homeland and region, caused by external and internal factors, collides with the understandable human instinct for their own, Bulgarian national self-preservation. Mixing them with migrants from other regions creates conditions of primitive non-identification of the candidate migrants: personal and of their goals.
It is clear that the Euro-aristocracy is unwilling or unable to control the process. It remains for us to make sure for ourselves, even if it is according to the ironic North Korean doctrine “chuhche”.
ogniangarkov.blog.bg
#European #hydra #Brussels #European #administration
