Home » today » Health » A New Study Reveals Alarming Levels of Nanoplastics in Popular Bottled Water Brands

A New Study Reveals Alarming Levels of Nanoplastics in Popular Bottled Water Brands




Nanoplastics Found in Bottled Water: Should You Be Concerned?

Nanoplastics Found in Bottled Water: Should You Be Concerned?

Introduction

Evian, Fiji, Voss, SmartWater, Aquafina, Dasani—it’s impressive how many brands we have for something humans have been consuming for millennia. Despite years of studies showing that bottled water is no safer to drink than tap water, Americans are consuming more bottled water than ever, to the tune of billions of dollars in bottled water sales.

People cite convenience and taste in addition to perceived safety for reasons they prefer bottle to tap, but the fear factor surrounding tap water is still a driving force. However, municipal water supplies are tested regularly, and in the vast majority of the U.S., you can safely grab a glass of water from a tap.

And now, a new study on nanoplastics found in three popular bottled water brands is throwing more data into the bottled vs. tap water choice.

Study Reveals Nanoplastics in Bottled Water

Researchers from Columbia University used a new laser-guided technology to detect nanoplastics that had previously evaded detection due to their minuscule size. The study, published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found an average of 240,000 nanoplastic particles per liter bottle between the three brands studied.

These nanoplastics, which can’t be seen by a microscope, pose a potential risk to human health as they are small enough to invade human cells and potentially disrupt cellular processes.

Possible Health Risks and Questions

While research is still ongoing, certain levels of microplastic exposure have been shown to adversely affect the viability of cells. Given that nanoplastics are even smaller, their potential to cause cellular damage still requires further investigation.

Furthermore, nanoparticles have the ability to bind various compounds, acting as carriers of environmental pollutants, toxins, antibiotics, or microorganisms. The implications of these potential contaminants remain unclear.

Source of Nanoplastics in Water

This study primarily focused on bottled water, which is often packaged in plastic. Additionally, the filters used in the water filtration and bottling process are usually made of plastic as well.

While it’s possible that some nanoplastics may already exist in the water from their original sources, microplastics have been detected in lakes, streams, and other freshwater sources, suggesting that nanoplastics may be present as well. However, bottled water generally contains higher levels of microplastics compared to tap water, indicating that most nanoplastics are likely a result of the bottling process and packaging.

Conclusion

Research shows that there is cause for concern regarding the presence of nanoplastics in bottled water. Despite our limited knowledge regarding the impact on human health, the abundance of these particles raises questions about their potential negative effects.

Given the various environmental reasons for avoiding bottled water unless absolutely necessary, opting for tap water remains an advisable choice. Although ongoing research is needed, the discovery of hundreds of thousands of nanoplastics in bottled water further supports the argument for making the switch.


Write a title to rank the highest in Google searches, for this news article: Embed noteFebruary 5, 2024, 4:00 AMFebruary 5, 2024, 4:00 AMFive former ministers, Lenny Valdivia, Carlos Romero, Reimi Ferreira, Roberto Aguilar and Hector Maple, They are in the sights of the lawyer, Eduardo León, who explained that the former authorities are responsible of having falsely accused him, even exposing him in books about the Zapata scandal.  Which means there will be a third trial.“On May 17, 2016, I was violently arrested by the internal security agencies of the State by order of Evo Morales and Juan Ramón Quintana, I was detained for 15 days, then my title was taken away, I was detained for 11 months preventive in the San Pedro prison, they gave me 15 months with house arrest with an escort and no way out,” claimed lawyer Eduardo León when pointing out his accusers from 2016. This Friday, the Fourth Court of Criminal Sentencing resolved the acquittal of the lawyer.  Now his reaction was immediate, he said that he will prosecute former ministers Valdivia and Ferreira for having published in their books data and statements that are in the file and that at that time were reserved because there was supposedly a minor.In August 2016, Lenny Valdivia presented the book, “The Great Scam of 21-F Caso Zapata”, with alleged revelations of a political conspiracy. A month later, at the Book Fair, it would be Reymi Ferreira’s turn who presented her work “Caso Zapata”, also linked to the case.“They used everything, they are a factor why there has been a series of statements that were not true and now they have to give an account in another process, either as witnesses or as accused,” the professional said.In the case of former minister Roberto Aguilar, León points to him as the main person responsible for having taken away his professional title and it was on November 25, 2019 when he was able to regain the title.  The other three former ministers, Romero, Quintana and Arce, are accused of being responsible for the scheme for which they persecuted him.This Friday the trial began, although the Court only resolved the issue of León and the exceptions and incidents presented by the parties were pending on February 8. According to the lawyers, State institutions cannot be part of the process, because there are no public goods to defend. They asked that the Ministry of Justice and the Ombudsman for Children be separated from the process.Then they objected to the process times, According to the lawyers, any case should last a maximum of three years and they have been there for eight, therefore they believe that the accusation had to be extinguished due to the time that had elapsed.  The notification to the parties was also observed.  . Remove your notes.

Write a title to rank the highest in Google searches, for this news article: Embed noteFebruary 5, 2024, 4:00 AMFebruary 5, 2024, 4:00 AMFive former ministers, Lenny Valdivia, Carlos Romero, Reimi Ferreira, Roberto Aguilar and Hector Maple, They are in the sights of the lawyer, Eduardo León, who explained that the former authorities are responsible of having falsely accused him, even exposing him in books about the Zapata scandal. Which means there will be a third trial.“On May 17, 2016, I was violently arrested by the internal security agencies of the State by order of Evo Morales and Juan Ramón Quintana, I was detained for 15 days, then my title was taken away, I was detained for 11 months preventive in the San Pedro prison, they gave me 15 months with house arrest with an escort and no way out,” claimed lawyer Eduardo León when pointing out his accusers from 2016. This Friday, the Fourth Court of Criminal Sentencing resolved the acquittal of the lawyer. Now his reaction was immediate, he said that he will prosecute former ministers Valdivia and Ferreira for having published in their books data and statements that are in the file and that at that time were reserved because there was supposedly a minor.In August 2016, Lenny Valdivia presented the book, “The Great Scam of 21-F Caso Zapata”, with alleged revelations of a political conspiracy. A month later, at the Book Fair, it would be Reymi Ferreira’s turn who presented her work “Caso Zapata”, also linked to the case.“They used everything, they are a factor why there has been a series of statements that were not true and now they have to give an account in another process, either as witnesses or as accused,” the professional said.In the case of former minister Roberto Aguilar, León points to him as the main person responsible for having taken away his professional title and it was on November 25, 2019 when he was able to regain the title. The other three former ministers, Romero, Quintana and Arce, are accused of being responsible for the scheme for which they persecuted him.This Friday the trial began, although the Court only resolved the issue of León and the exceptions and incidents presented by the parties were pending on February 8. According to the lawyers, State institutions cannot be part of the process, because there are no public goods to defend. They asked that the Ministry of Justice and the Ombudsman for Children be separated from the process.Then they objected to the process times, According to the lawyers, any case should last a maximum of three years and they have been there for eight, therefore they believe that the accusation had to be extinguished due to the time that had elapsed. The notification to the parties was also observed. . Remove your notes.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.