Europe’s dilemma: Navigating a More Assertive U.S. Under Trump’s Second Term
Days after Donald Trump’s reelection in November 2024, French President Emmanuel Macron delivered a stark warning to European leaders: “We tend to think we should delegate our geopolitics to the United States, our growth model to our Chinese clients, and our technological innovation to American hyperscalers. For me, it’s simple. The world is made up of herbivores and carnivores. If we decide to remain herbivores, then the carnivores will win, and we will be a market for them.”
This moment, captured on camera, highlighted the challenges Europe faces as it grapples with a more assertive United States under Trump’s leadership.Macron’s call for resilience comes at a time when Europe is deeply divided, with populist movements gaining traction across the continent.His own political standing has been weakened, further complicating efforts to forge a unified response.
Europe’s economic struggles add another layer of complexity. The energy crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and a slowdown in China—the European Union’s third-largest export market—have exacerbated sluggish growth. These factors make the pursuit of an independent European path a daunting task.
The stakes are high. Europe’s response to Trump’s transactional approach could shape the future of the trans-Atlantic alliance,a cornerstone of the geopolitical West. Over the next four years, washington is expected to challenge this alliance in several ways.Threats of steep tariffs, efforts to divide Europe by favoring certain nations, and a potential reevaluation of U.S. commitments to Ukraine and European security are all on the table.
Other irritants loom large. Trump and his allies have shown support for Europe’s far-right movements, with figures like Elon Musk amplifying groups such as Germany’s Alternative for Germany. Climate change, a priority for Europe, is likely to be deprioritized by the Trump governance.
Europe, however, is not without options. Brussels is prepared to negotiate, placate, and, if necessary, retaliate. Analysts suggest Europe may pursue one of three paths:
- Conciliation and closer alignment with the U.S.: This approach could minimize economic disruption in the short term, especially if Europe avoids Trump’s tariffs. A 10 percent U.S.tariff could cost the EU up to 1 percent of its GDP growth.
- Division and paralysis: A fragmented Europe could struggle to respond effectively to U.S. pressure.
- Strategic autonomy: Europe could bolster its competitiveness, military capabilities, and independence, a move that might strengthen the West in the long run.
| Europe’s Potential Paths | Pros | Cons |
|——————————-|———-|———-|
| Conciliation with the U.S. | Minimizes short-term economic disruption | Risks long-term dependency |
| Division and paralysis | Avoids immediate conflict | Weakens Europe’s global influence |
| Strategic autonomy | Strengthens europe’s independence | requires significant investment and unity |
While closer alignment with the U.S. might seem appealing in the near term, greater strategic autonomy could ultimately benefit Europe, the U.S., and the world.A more prosperous and assertive Europe,aligned with the fundamental interests of the West,could reinforce the trans-Atlantic bond.
As Trump’s second term unfolds, Europe’s choices will shape not only its own future but also the trajectory of the global order. The continent’s ability to navigate this complex landscape will be a defining story of the coming years.
Trump’s Trade and Defense Demands: A New Era of U.S.-Europe Tensions
As former President Donald Trump resumes office, his administration is poised to take a more aggressive stance on trade and defense with Europe, signaling a potential escalation in transatlantic tensions. Trump’s recent complaints about the U.S. trade deficit with the EU, calling Europe “very, very bad to us” on trade, underscore his renewed focus on reshaping the economic and geopolitical relationship between the two powers.
Trade Wars 2.0: Tariffs and Retaliation
Trump’s trade agenda is already in motion, with early actions likely targeting Europe. One of the first steps could be the reinstatement of steel and aluminum tariffs that were paused by President Joe Biden. Additionally, trump’s 2019 tariffs on $7.5 billion in European consumer goods, tied to the Boeing-Airbus dispute, may make a comeback.
This time, however, Trump is expected to go further. He has hinted at imposing duties on European autos, citing a lack of trade reciprocity. While the EU imposes a 10 percent tariff on U.S. auto imports, the U.S. tariff stands at just 2.5 percent.In a recent interview, Trump labeled Europe a “double whammy,” accusing it of exploiting the U.S. on trade while relying on American defense.
Trump has also threatened tariffs if Europe doesn’t increase its purchases of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) and oil. His “America First Trade Policy” executive order, signed instantly upon resuming office, has initiated sweeping investigations into global trading partners, with findings due by April 1.This signals that no sector or country is safe from potential tariffs.
Defense Spending and Ukraine: A New Twist
On defense, Trump is doubling down on his demand for Europe to “cough up more.” While his first term saw NATO members increase defense spending by an average of 0.27 percent of GDP, Trump is now pushing for a 5 percent target, up from the previous 2 percent goal.
But there’s a new twist: Trump is pressuring Europe to shoulder more of the burden for Ukraine, particularly in military aid. This demand adds a layer of complexity to the already strained transatlantic relationship, as Europe grapples with its own economic and security challenges.
Europe’s Response: Unity and Countermeasures
Europe is preparing for a potential showdown. The EU aims to remain unified and negotiate at the bloc level, rather than allowing individual member states to be picked off. If the U.S.imposes tariffs on strategic industries like autos, the EU is expected to retaliate swiftly with duties on politically sensitive U.S. goods.
however, the EU is also open to offering concessions in areas like defense, energy, and trade. Europe’s position has shifted considerably since 2016, with its reliance on cheap russian gas and exports to China no longer viable. The EU competitiveness report, led by former European Central Bank President mario Draghi, highlights the bloc’s challenges, including inadequate investment and the need for a new industrial strategy.
Key Points at a Glance
| Issue | Trump’s Demands | Europe’s Response |
|————————–|———————————————|——————————————|
| Trade Tariffs | Reinstating steel/aluminum tariffs, auto duties | Retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods |
| Defense Spending | 5% of GDP target, more aid for Ukraine | potential concessions, unified negotiation|
| Energy | Increased purchases of U.S. LNG and oil | Exploring alternatives, reducing reliance|
A New Chapter in U.S.-Europe Relations
As Trump’s second term unfolds,the U.S.-Europe relationship is entering uncharted territory. With trade wars looming and defense demands escalating, both sides face high stakes. Europe’s ability to navigate these challenges will depend on its unity and willingness to adapt to a rapidly changing geopolitical landscape.
For now, the transatlantic alliance remains at a crossroads, with the potential for both conflict and cooperation shaping the future of this critical partnership.
europe’s economic Challenges: How the EU is Losing Ground to the U.S. and China
The European Union (EU) is facing a critical juncture as it grapples with stagnant productivity growth, a lack of market and financial integration, and burdensome regulations.These challenges have eroded its competitive edge, allowing the United States and China to surge ahead in the global economic race. Over the past eight years, the U.S. economy has grown significantly, with its $28 trillion GDP now $9 trillion larger than the EU’s—a stark contrast to the near parity between the two economies in 2011.
The widening gap underscores the EU’s struggle to keep pace with the economic dynamism of its global rivals. As the U.S. and China continue to innovate and expand, Europe’s regulatory surroundings and fragmented markets have stifled growth, leaving the bloc at a crossroads.
The U.S. and China’s Economic Dominance
The United States has leveraged its robust technological advancements, flexible labor markets, and aggressive fiscal policies to outpace Europe. Meanwhile, China’s rapid industrialization and strategic investments in infrastructure and technology have cemented its position as a global economic powerhouse.
In contrast, the EU’s regulatory framework, while designed to ensure stability, has frequently enough been criticized for being overly restrictive. This has hindered innovation and productivity, particularly in key sectors like manufacturing and technology. For instance, the automotive industry, a cornerstone of Europe’s economy, has faced significant challenges in transitioning to electric vehicles (EVs) due to regulatory hurdles and market fragmentation.
!New VW electric microbus cars parked before delivery
New VW electric microbus cars are seen parked before delivery at the commercial vehicle plant of German car manufacturer Volkswagen in hanover, Germany, on Dec. 20, 2024. (Ronny Hartmann/AFP via Getty images)
Europe’s Response to Global Pressures
The EU’s reaction to these challenges will likely shape its future trajectory. Analysts suggest that Europe’s response could tilt in one of three directions, each with far-reaching implications for the geopolitical landscape:
- Regulatory Reforms: Streamlining regulations to foster innovation and attract investment.
- Increased Integration: Deepening market and financial integration to enhance competitiveness.
- Protectionist Measures: Implementing tariffs and trade barriers to shield domestic industries.
Much will depend on the initial moves of key global players, including the united States. As an example,former President Donald Trump’s potential return to office could reignite trade tensions,particularly over auto tariffs,which would further strain EU-U.S. relations.
The Road Ahead for Europe
To regain its competitive edge, the EU must address its structural weaknesses. This includes fostering greater collaboration among member states, investing in cutting-edge technologies, and creating a more business-pleasant environment.
The stakes are high. Without decisive action, Europe risks falling further behind the U.S. and china, jeopardizing its economic stability and global influence.
| Key Economic Indicators | EU | U.S. | China |
|—————————–|——–|———-|———–|
| GDP (2024) | $19T | $28T | $18T |
| Productivity Growth | Low | High | Moderate |
| Regulatory Environment | Strict | Flexible | Evolving |
Conclusion
The EU stands at a pivotal moment in its economic history. By addressing its regulatory and integration challenges, the bloc can reclaim its position as a global economic leader. However, failure to act could cement its decline, leaving the U.S. and China to dominate the 21st-century economy.What steps should Europe take to revitalize its economy? Share your thoughts in the comments below.
—
For more insights on global economic trends, visit Foreign Policy.
Europe’s Trump Gambit: A New Era of Trans-Atlantic Relations
As the European Union braces for a potential second Trump presidency, its leaders are crafting a strategic conciliation package aimed at maintaining stability across the Atlantic. The European Commission’s “Trump task force” is reportedly preparing a series of concessions designed to appease the former U.S. president, should he return to power. These measures include greater alignment with China on export controls and investment restrictions, increased purchases of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG), and potential carveouts for U.S. imports from Europe’s upcoming Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism.This accommodation strategy seeks to avoid the economic disruptions that characterized Trump’s first term, such as the steel and aluminum tariffs that strained U.S.-EU relations. By focusing on targeted tariffs rather than broader duties, Europe hopes to keep its economic ties with the U.S. intact while maintaining a workable relationship on critical issues like aid to Ukraine.
A Shift in Priorities
However, this approach comes with significant trade-offs. To avoid antagonizing Trump,the EU may need to sideline some of its key priorities,particularly in climate and technology. As a notable example, enforcement of the Digital Services Act and Digital Markets Act against U.S. Big Tech companies, including Elon Musk’s X, could take a back seat. This ideological convergence would likely elevate right-wing leaders within the EU,such as Italy’s Giorgia Meloni,Poland’s Andrzej Duda,and Hungary’s Viktor Orban,who align more closely with Trump’s worldview.
The result? A europe increasingly bound to the United States politically, economically, and ideologically—a continent forged in Trump’s image. While this could strengthen the trans-Atlantic alliance, it may also defer structural reforms needed to boost Europe’s market integration and competitiveness.
Economic Implications
The EU’s growth is expected to remain modest, hovering in the 1-2 percent range. While Washington may refrain from imposing the most damaging tariffs, the lack of bold economic reforms could limit Europe’s long-term potential. On the flip side, if the U.S. shifts its trade focus to China, Europe could benefit from trade diversion, as European exports become more attractive to U.S. consumers.
Key Players and Dynamics
The EU’s key interlocutors in this scenario—Meloni, Duda, and Orban—are likely to play pivotal roles in shaping the bloc’s relationship with a Trump-led U.S. Their alignment with Trump’s ideological preferences could lend the union a distinctly Trumpian flavor, further solidifying the trans-Atlantic alliance but at the cost of Europe’s autonomy on critical issues.
| Key Elements of the EU’s Trump Strategy |
|———————————————|
| Greater alignment with China on export controls and investment restrictions |
| Increased purchases of U.S. LNG |
| Concessions on steel and aluminum tariffs |
| carveouts for U.S. imports from the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism |
| Pledges to increase defense spending, including aid to Ukraine |
A Changed Alliance
the EU’s strategy reflects a pragmatic approach to navigating the uncertainties of a potential Trump presidency. By accommodating trump’s preferences, Europe aims to preserve its economic and security ties with the U.S. while avoiding the most disruptive policies. Though, this approach also underscores the challenges of maintaining a strong trans-Atlantic alliance in an era of shifting ideological and geopolitical priorities.
As Europe prepares for this new chapter, the question remains: Can the EU balance its own priorities with the demands of a Trump-led U.S.,or will it find itself increasingly shaped by the former president’s vision? Only time will tell.
For more insights on the evolving U.S.-EU relationship, explore our analysis of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and its implications for global trade.-GettyImages-2194914139.jpg?resize=1000,667 1000w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Trump-Europe-Meloni-gettyimages-2194914139.jpg?resize=275,183 275w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Trump-Europe-Meloni-GettyImages-2194914139.jpg?resize=325,217 325w, https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Trump-Europe-Meloni-GettyImages-2194914139.jpg?resize=600,400 600w” sizes=”(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px” loading=”lazy”/>
U.S. Rep.Kat Cammack and Italian Prime minister Giorgia Meloni take a selfie at the inauguration of Trump in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington on Jan. 20.Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
France, on July 18, 2024, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen outlined a bold vision for Europe’s future. Speaking before a dais of seated officials, von der Leyen emphasized the need for Europe to embrace strategic autonomy, a concept that has gained urgency in the face of mounting global challenges. 