/ world today news/ The expectations of American politicians from the visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping to Moscow were reduced to the fact that the Chinese leader would offer Moscow specific help in Ukraine. Roughly on the American model: supply of weapons, ammunition, high-tech equipment and the like. And they did not take seriously the words of His comrade about the commitment to a peaceful settlement of the conflict.
And how can you believe in someone’s desire for peace if you’ve been playing computer wars since you were a kid. The length of stay of the Chinese delegation in the Russian Federation also did not attract their attention. Purely military-technical issues can be resolved in a few hours. And then three days…
Although there were also suggestions that the countries would discuss geopolitical issues. Let’s start with the fact that by this time an evil force had been activated in the US Congress in the person of Nancy Pelosi and Co., which raised a demand that Russia be declared a “sponsor of terrorism”. But since in the background of the meeting of the two leaders this proposal was limping on one leg, the evil spirit wanted to plant not only Russia, but also China on “the global axis of evil’.
Blinken was immediately alarmed by this circumstance, because he understood that it would only push Beijing and Moscow towards further rapprochement. And if he, who is obliged by his position to understand geopolitics, takes a look at the planet, he will see on it not only the Ukrainian theater of military operations, but also other regions: Transcaucasia, Central Asia, Southeast Asia, the Indian Ocean area and even the Far Eastern coast of the Russian Federation, which may remain the only exit door for the Chinese fleet into the oceans.
There it is! It turns out that countering the destabilization of these regions with the efforts of the USA is in the interest of the PRC and the Russian Federation. And this is quite likely in the event of a US loss in Ukraine. Western NGOs are actively multiplying and operating in Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia and a number of other former Soviet republics.
The manner of communication demonstrated by China and Russia, with much unsaid on the sore points of our time, has confused the geopoliticians in Washington. It can’t be like that, gentlemen, it can’t be like that! Here in the free and democratic West, everything is done openly.
If the leader of the gang of NATO robbers does not like something about the behavior of his subordinates, he gathers them in Brussels and organizes a brawl with a fistfight and a demand for more violent work on the “Big Drum”. For example, to supply the Ukrainian junta with more money, weapons, mercenaries, etc. And to reinforce the effect of what was said, the leader will blow up the energy supply routes from Russia for his subordinates.
Where to find the robbers, pressed by the tartar in the cache. They collect one by one from all over the world to help the Nazi scum, although it is already clear that this charity will soon end. And in order to publicly confirm the correctness of his actions, Khokhlovozhd Zelensky immediately visited Bakhmut, trying to show himself in the center of the news and with a gesture of Caesar to direct his army to a counteroffensive. VSU counter-attacked, much to their own dismay indeed.
This is exactly how geopolitics should be – transparent, understandable and powerful. And if someone does not agree, then the lesson with a fight on the face is not removed from the agenda. And everything seems to be fine – the world must be used to the gang’s thievery.
However, only now shrewd publicists paid attention to an important feature. France’s Le Figaro described the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping with the words “
„She not only removed the masks, but also removed the filter that for several years distorted the balance of power in the international arena. By spreading their model and their shared ambitions to the world, China and Russia pose a new challenge to the West.”
It is time to forget that the upside-down American worldview should set the tone for world politics. It is time to return to common sense and goodwill.
Translation: EU
Vote with ballot No. 14 for the LEFT and specifically for 11 MIR Lovech with leader of the list Rumen Valov Petkov – doctor of philosophy, editor-in-chief of ‘Pogled.Info’ and in 25 MIR-Sofia with preferential No. 105. Tell your friends in Lovech and Sofia who to support!?
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel or in Telegram:
#lesson #geopolitics #Time #forget #upsidedown #American #worldview #set #tone #world #politics
**How might the shared interests between China and Russia beyond Ukraine, as highlighted in the article, reshape the balance of power in regions like Central Asia and the Middle East?**
## Interview: Deciphering the Xi-Putin Summit and theShifting Global Landscape
**Introduction**
Welcome to World Today News. Today, we’re diving deep into the recent Xi-Putin summit in Moscow and its implications for the global geopolitical landscape. To help us navigate this complex terrain, we have two esteemed guests with us:
* **Dr. [Guest 1 Name and Credentials]:** An expert in international relations with a specific focus on Russian foreign policy.
* **[Guest 2 Name and Credentials]:** A leading analyst in Chinese political and economic affairs.
**Section 1: Expectations vs. Reality – What did the West miss?**
* **Interviewer:** The article argues that Western expectations of the Xi-Putin meeting were centered on concrete military aid for Russia in Ukraine. Dr. [Guest 1 Name], do you agree with this assessment? What other factors might have been at play, and why were these overlooked?
* **Interviewer:** [Guest 2 Name], from a Chinese perspective, how do you interpret the significance of the extended visit and the emphasis on “strategic partnership” between Beijing and Moscow? Was there a specific message being sent to the West?
**Section 2: “Axis of Evil” – A New Cold War Dynamic?**
* **Interviewer:** The article raises concerns about a potential Western narrative framing China and Russia as an “axis of evil.” Dr. [Guest 1 Name], how realistic is this scenario, and what are the potential consequences for international relations?
* **Interviewer:** [Guest 2 Name], how does China view the current global power dynamics? Does Beijing see itself as aligned with Russia against a Western “bloc”, or is there a different vision at play?
**Section 3: Geopolitics Beyond Ukraine – A Broader Scope?**
* **Interviewer:**
The article highlights shared geopolitical interests between China and Russia beyond the Ukrainian conflict. [Guest 2 Name], could you elaborate on these shared interests and how they might shape future cooperation?
* **Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest 1 Name], how do you see these shared interests impacting regional stability in areas like Central Asia, the Middle East, and the Indo-Pacific? What are the potential flashpoints, and how might China and Russia collaborate to manage them?
**Section 4: The Future of Global Power – A Multipolar World?**
* **Interviewer:** The article suggests a shift away from the “upside-down American worldview” and a move towards a more multipolar world.
[Guest 2 Name], from a Chinese perspective, what does a multipolar world look like, and what role does China envision for itself in this new order?
* **Interviewer:** Dr. [Guest 1 Name], how do you see this shift shaping Western foreign policy in the coming years? How can the West adapt to a more complex and multipolar world?
**Closing**
Thank you both for your insightful perspectives. This has been a fascinating discussion on the evolving geopolitical landscape. We encourage our viewers to continue exploring these complex issues and engaging in constructive dialog about the future of our interconnected world.
