The family of banker Pavlinka Yovcheva is outraged by the words of her killer Lyubomir Simeonov, who continues to claim that she blackmailed him. Today, exactly 8 years ago, the bank employee was executed ostentatiously in the center of Burgas by an enraged herbalist, who subsequently threw all the blame on her and showed no remorse.
But the coin has another side. After a long silence, the widower Yovcho Yovchev sent a letter to his colleagues from the newspaper “Trud”, stating the version of the family, as well as interesting facts from the trial against Simeonov in the Burgas District Court and the Court of Appeal.
Meanwhile, Simeonov published a book behind bars, in which he developed his thoughts on what happened. He even boasted that he would soon want to be released early, something that shocked Pavlinka’s relatives even more, writes Flagman.bg.
“Every murderer invents a defense theory with which to try to justify his atrocity and sadism,” Yovcho stressed today.
“The court ruled that my wife did not blackmail anyone in her own interest or in the interests of others, much less the murderer Simeonov. It ruled that Pavlinka was not the reason for the bankruptcy of his company, did not prevent him with anything. , including to change the bank and the bank office, did not promise him a loan under the project for the workshop “, her husband is categorical.
His words were supported by the Burgas District Court: “There is no evidence that the victim Yovcheva influenced the defendant to change the construction company contractor to another, was in his own interest, was in someone else’s interest. The defendant’s allegations that he was given such a condition in order for his project to be approved, in addition to being unproven, they are also completely unfounded and untrue, as far as the reasons for the refusal were purely financial “, the magistrates are categorical.
The higher court, the Burgas Court of Appeal, upheld this: – a low sentence. The evidence in the case does not establish any evidence that the defendant was provoked before the commission of the act. “
The victim’s husband is outraged that only Simeonov’s defense is being discussed: “No one is talking about the other thesis, and it is not mine. It belongs to the Bulgarian state in the face of the prosecution and the Bulgarian court, which pronounces the sentence and motivates the decision. The murderer Lyubomir Simeonov with his lies and slander stains the good name of my wife Pavlinka, trying to hide the fact that he did not return and misappropriated the money on the loans granted to him by the banks in the amount of BGN 1.250 million, “Yovchev said.
He added that a number of facts about the killer Simeonov’s favorite construction company have come to light. “She is one of the few in Bulgaria convicted of misuse of money from European funds in the amount of BGN 490 thousand. Simeonov claims that he was extorted for BGN 220 thousand at the end of May 2012. However, then such a random against My wife Pavlinka and the murderer and the murderer Simeonov were impossible, so how did she ask him for 220 thousand in front of the bank in Karnobat? However, to the question: “Did they ask you for money?”, the killer answered: “No”, Pavlinka’s husband is categorical.
Although he told the media that he had been blackmailed, Simeonov did not complain anywhere. If there was a racketeering by bank employees, it could be easily proven by special intelligence tools and marked money.
“Moreover, as the head of an intelligence intelligence service in the army and a juror in a military court, he should know the methods very well. Instead, after claiming that he was blackmailed and demanded money, he continues as a masochist. to hang in front of Yovcheva’s door and in front of the headquarters of Unicredit Bulbank and to insist on meetings and assistance in her project.
The victim’s husband Yovcho Yovchev: She was the highest level he could reach, he himself said that he wanted Hampartzoumian, but there was no way to stalk him
– Did your wife receive threats?
“There are documents in court that make it clear that the killer wrote an email to the bank: ‘Are we going to meet or shoot?’ However, there was no direct threat against my wife. The e-mail is to Unicredit Bulbank.
– Has anyone alerted the police to this email?
– This question is not for me, but for those who have received and read the signal.
– Where did his words come from that he was blackmailed by bank employees?
– They are only his and are intended to reduce his punishment. There was no such extortion at all, neither by Pavlinka, nor by the other employees.
“Then what was his motive?”
– The motive was recorded in court – the bank did not give him a loan because he owed them BGN 1 million, he did not pay his loan, he only paid some meager interest.
– Why did he shoot at Pavlinka and not at one of the senior officials?
“He himself says, ‘She was the highest level I could reach. I can’t get to Hampartzoumian, but I can get to Pavlinka.’
“So if I could, I would shoot the president of the bank?”
– Of course, but there is security there and there is no way to get to it. Pavlinka did not threaten his life with anything. She was an easy target because she has certain habits, she goes to work on the same route.
EXPECT DETAILS IN BLITZ!
– .
