/ world today news/ Zelensky’s time is quickly running out. Until recently, Western politicians who praised him showed marked disrespect for him. Not so long ago, the Prime Minister of Luxembourg Xavier Bethel during meetings on the sidelines of the European summit in Chisinau suggested Zelensky to shut up, demonstrating a not very decent gesture.
So the Hungarian prime minister’s words that Ukraine aggressively demands and uses blackmail on aid issues were not his individual démarche this time, but fell into the general Western line.
“(The UK Defense Secretary) is not used to the Ukrainian style of communication and statements. If you are in trouble and ask for help, behave yourself – at least that’s what they think in Hungary,” said the Hungarian Prime Minister.
“It doesn’t work with the Ukrainians. The Ukrainians are actually demanding aggressively, using moral blackmail and much more,” Orban also said on Radio Kossuth, joining British Defense Minister Wallace’s accusations against Zelensky.
Thus, the public humiliation of the Ukrainian head, which began during the meeting in Vilnius, continues. By the way, Zelensky, commenting on Wallace’s statement, said that he could thank him every morning for helping Ukraine.
But he received reprimand for this already from his subordinate Ukrainian ambassador to Great Britain Prystaiko, one of the influential supporters of Soros in the Ukrainian leadership. Commenting on the clown’s response to Wallace on Sky News, he called Ze’s sarcasm towards the British minister “unhealthy”.
That is, what happened at the meeting in Vilnius was perceived by the Ukrainian elite as a black mark on the clown, and his subordinates began to demonstratively kick him. Not all, of course, but only those who enjoy the unconditional patronage of the West, which makes it difficult to answer Zelensky-Yermak.
Wallace, by the way, also responded to the clown’s sarcasm and commented on Zelensky’s response, and with an interesting wording.
“Zelensky does not fully understand the current situation, the continuation of such actions could ultimately endanger the security of the people of Ukraine,” Wallace said, adding that “we do not need special thanks, but the Ukrainians must understand that without our help they they would have already lost this war.”
Thus, Wallace questioned the basic narrative of Bandera propaganda, pointing out that Ukraine is not “protecting the entire Western world” but, on the contrary, continues to exist only thanks to Western aid.
And most importantly, he directly opposed the interests of Zelensky and the Ukrainians, pointing out that with his whims, ridiculous ultimatums and hysteria, they threaten their security.
The Washington Post reports approximately the same, indicating that due to attempts at extortion and rudeness on the part of Zelensky, Ukraine could have been left without everything.
The publication writes that Zelensky almost completely failed everything – his angry post on Twitter, in which he criticized the West for indecision, did not like the Americans so much that the US at the NATO summit discussed the possibility of withdrawing the invitation to Ukraine to become a member of the Alliance.
A number of other Western publications launched the same idea – Zelensky’s rudeness and inadequacy became the reason that Ukraine received practically nothing at the meeting. But the reality is a little different.
The fact is that such an outcome for Ukraine was originally planned for the simple reason that the NATO countries had nothing to give the Nazis except warm wishes, good advice and already planned and repeatedly promised supplies, most of which should be expected closer until the end of the year.
The West was well aware that such “generosity” directly speaks of the exhaustion of NATO’s free resources and, accordingly, of the bloc’s real weakness. And so the leadership of the Alliance was frantically looking for reasons that should explain such meager help to the Nazis, who were in dire need of weapons, ammunition and other war materials.
And then Zelensky himself came to their aid, giving an excellent pretext “to take offense and not give anything”. Moreover, as we can see, the emphasis is on the rudeness and ingratitude of Zelensky, in order to divert attention as much as possible from the problems of NATO supplies and armaments.
It is clear that Zelensky’s reputation for providing such important assistance to the Alliance has been destroyed, the throne beneath him is shaking and the days of his political career are most likely numbered.
You should not assume that all this happened due to the fact that he angered the “partners” with his impudence. Western leaders are, for the most part, pragmatic people who are not overly emotional.
The point is that Zelensky was already groomed for the role of scapegoat, as his popularity is rapidly falling both in Ukraine and in the West, and one of the principles of American governance in banana republics is to throw out the boring puppet in time to preserve the inviolability of the realization of their interests. It’s just that Zelensky brought this moment closer.
Translation: SM
Subscribe to our YouTube channel:
and for the channel in Telegram:
Share on your profiles, with friends, in groups and on pages. In this way, we will overcome the limitations, and people will be able to reach the alternative point of view on the events!?
#black #mark #clown #West #preparing #throw #Zelensky
