The court needs time to rule on a case of abuse of weakness, which was examined in a corrective hearing on Tuesday, November 8. The judges postponed their resolution until December 6, while the prosecution asked for the suspension of the prison sentence against this couple with a clean criminal record. One year with suspended sentence for him, 78 years, and six months with suspended sentence for her, at 75 years old.
€ 6,620 in withdrawals from the victim’s account
Up for grabs, cash withdrawals of 6,620 euros between July and October 2021, from the account of the victim, suffering from Alzheimer’s. And at the same time, you deposit on that of Mr. for 5,440 €. The accused defends himself:
She did the withdrawals herself, she also knew how to write checks. She filled me with one, which I never cashed.
He explains, which he had not done before the investigators in 2021, who were “Travelers doing work on the roof of his house. And she went to get 2,500 euros in cash, in July or August 2021. Another made her shutters and also unblocked the sewers. She had been stripped. “The president of the court objects:
Withdrawals stop when you are summoned in front of the investigators.
Alert of grandchildren and grandchildren to the prosecution
It was the victim’s nephews who alerted the prosecutor with a letter dated September 30, 2021, expressing “their concerns” for their aunt. The defendant was in fact a friend of the victim’s brother. “When he died, he told me ‘take care of my sister'”, which explains why he takes her to the races, to the grocery shopping. He acknowledges having accepted the payment of a full tank of gas and 300 euros for the repair of the shutters in his home.
As for the deposits in your account, they correspond to your personal income. “I sold a trailer, a ride on mower. And the boys paid me back some of what they owed me. “
Wife sued for fraud
His wife is prosecuted for scam, for having written a letter of withdrawal from a procedure of custody of the victim. “My husband can’t write. He took Me to her house to write the letter. But it was she (the victim) who dictated it,” explains the defendant.
Both claim that the victim refused guardianship because he did not trust his grandchildren.
In Montluçon (Allier), he robs the renovation site of a former client’s house
Turkmen Seher
[email protected]
