Old Firm Derby: Away Fans Return to Celtic Park and Ibrox Amidst Heightened Security

Glasgow, Scotland – The storied Old Firm derby between Celtic and Rangers is set to reignite with the return of away fans, a pivotal moment after years of strained relations. On Sunday, Celtic Park and Ibrox will once again host supporters from both sides, marking a return to tradition after pandemic-related disruptions and ticket allocation disputes. This highly anticipated resumption comes with unprecedented security measures, including the installation of large nets to prevent fans from being struck by projectiles, a frist for Scottish domestic football. The Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL) played a crucial role in negotiating this return, aiming to restore the intense atmosphere that defines this historic rivalry.

The absence of away fans has been keenly felt by supporters and football enthusiasts alike. The electric atmosphere and intense rivalry they bring are considered integral to the Old Firm experience.While acknowledging the fixture’s history of sectarian singing and other issues, most recognize it as Scottish football’s biggest spectacle, a match that transcends the sport itself and embodies a deep-seated cultural and historical significance.

The SPFL’s intervention last year aimed to bridge the divide and restore the conventional dynamic of the derby. The reduction in away allocations began in 2018 when Rangers,after appointing Steven Gerrard as manager,decided to sell season tickets in the stand historically reserved for Celtic supporters. This decision followed a period of increasing frustration among Rangers fans as Celtic dominated the rivalry, both on and off the pitch.

The subsequent seven years were marked by what has been described as “ticket turmoil,” exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. both clubs traded criticisms regarding security arrangements and the safety of the reduced number of traveling fans, eventually leading to a complete ban on away supporters. This ban not only impacted the atmosphere of the games but also raised questions about the future of the Old Firm derby and its place in Scottish society.

Lengthy and Delicate Negotiations

Breaking the deadlock required “lengthy and delicate” negotiations involving the police, the clubs, and the league. The agreement reached includes the installation of large nets at both Celtic Park and Ibrox. This measure, while common in European leagues, is a stark reminder of the challenges faced in managing fan behavior during this high-stakes fixture. The nets represent a physical barrier, but also symbolize the ongoing efforts to address the underlying issues that contribute to fan violence.

Both Celtic and Rangers express hope that the nets will not become permanent fixtures. Scottish football authorities have been advocating for stricter penalties from the police and the justice system for unacceptable conduct within stadiums. The police’s approach to safety inside the grounds was a crucial element of the negotiations,with all parties seeking a solution that prioritizes the safety and well-being of fans and players alike.

Police Scotland has stated that its officers are experienced in managing large football matches and are prepared for the changes in ticketing arrangements. Though, they have faced challenges in recent years with the rise of violent clashes between “ultras groups” associated with both clubs, frequently enough occurring away from the stadiums. These clashes, often pre-arranged and highly organized, pose a meaningful threat to public safety and require a different approach from traditional match-day policing.

In December, chaotic scenes unfolded in Glasgow city center as large groups of fans engaged in violent confrontations, forcing Christmas shoppers to seek cover. Since then, Police scotland has utilized additional powers to stop and search individuals suspected of involvement in such incidents. This proactive approach aims to deter potential troublemakers and prevent further outbreaks of violence.

While the Old Firm derby has historically presented challenges related to drunken violence, the emergence of organized fighting poses a significant threat. However,it’s crucial to remember that “the disorder and violence is the exception not the rule.” The vast majority of supporters attend the games to support their team, experiencing the highs and lows of the match.

They engage in the traditional banter and taunting, contributing to an atmosphere that is “the envy of some the richest leagues on the planet.” This passionate support is what makes the Old Firm derby so special, and it’s crucial to preserve this tradition while addressing the issues that threaten its future.

Celtic is reportedly interested in returning to the pre-2018 arrangement, which allowed approximately 7,000 away fans to attend. However, Rangers have indicated that current season ticket sales at Ibrox make that impractical. The allocation of tickets remains a sensitive issue, with both clubs seeking to balance the needs of their supporters with the need to ensure safety and security.

for now, both clubs and their fans agree that the return of away fans, even with the added security measures, is “a step in the right direction.” This return represents a renewed commitment to the traditions of the Old Firm derby and a hope for a future where the rivalry can be celebrated in a safe and respectful habitat.

“The return of away fans to the Old Firm derby isn’t just about football; it’s a engaging case study in managing deeply ingrained social tensions within the context of a high-stakes sporting event.”

Dr. Alistair Cameron, Sports sociologist

Dr. Alistair Cameron, a Sports Sociologist, offers further insights into the complexities surrounding the Old Firm derby and the return of away fans. He emphasizes the historical context of the rivalry, stating that it is “much more than a football match; it’s a deeply entrenched societal phenomenon reflecting historical, religious, and cultural divides within Glasgow and Scotland.”

Dr. Cameron highlights the importance of understanding the historical context, including the religious affiliations traditionally associated with each club’s fan base and the socio-economic factors that have played a role, to grasp current tensions. He notes that “the absence of away fans, while seemingly a simple security measure, significantly lessened the traditional atmosphere and, for many, diminished the very essence of this iconic sporting event.”

Regarding the installation of large nets at both stadiums, Dr.Cameron acknowledges that while they offer a physical barrier, “they don’t address the root causes of the violence.” He emphasizes that “this solution is a band-aid, not a cure,” and that deeper issues of sectarianism, hooliganism, and organized violence require multi-faceted strategies.

Dr.Cameron suggests that these strategies should include “improved policing and stricter penalties to community engagement and educational programs.” He believes that installing nets signals an acknowledgement of the severity of the problem while recognizing the need for more thorough and long-term solutions.

dr. Cameron underscores the SPFL’s paramount role as the intermediary between the clubs, the police, and the wider community. He advocates for a multi-pronged approach that includes:

• Enhanced dialog: Maintain open and obvious communication channels with both clubs, fan groups, and the police.
• Targeted Education campaigns: Invest in programs targeting young fans promoting tolerance and responsible behavior.
• Stricter Penalties: Advocate for stronger penalties by the justice system for violent and discriminatory behavior inside and outside stadiums.
• Community Engagement: Partner with local community organizations to improve relations between rival fan bases and lessen the influence of extremist elements.
• Technological Advancements: Explore the use of technology for improved crowd control and the identification of troublemakers.

Addressing the rise of violent clashes between “ultra” groups, Dr. Cameron stresses that “police strategies must adapt to address this emerging threat.” He recommends:

• Intelligence Gathering: Improved intelligence gathering about the organization, movements, and planned actions of these groups.
• Preemptive Policing: Proactive deployment of police resources, including utilizing intelligence for preemptive action to deter and disrupt planned violence.
• Collaboration: Close collaboration with counterparts in other cities to prevent the movement of these groups to avoid clashes in other locations.
• Public Relations: Open and transparent communication with the public to ensure they are aware of what security measures are in place.

Ultimately, Dr. cameron believes that “the return of away fans represents a crucial step, but it’s not a panacea.” He emphasizes that sustainable change requires a shift in several aspects of society’s culture and that “if the root causes of sectarianism, religious intolerance, and the wider social divisions within Glasgow and beyond are not addressed, the enhancement will be temporary.”

Dr. Cameron concludes that “the long-term hope is to create a future where the Old Firm derby is celebrated not just as a captivating sporting event, but as a symbol of unity and progress.” This requires collective understanding, improved community engagement, and a broader societal shift away from the cultural divides which have fueled many past incidences.

The return of away fans to the Old Firm derby marks a significant moment in Scottish football. While challenges remain, this step forward offers a glimmer of hope for a future where the rivalry can be celebrated in a safe and respectful environment, contributing to the rich tapestry of Scottish sporting culture.