“`html
Police attorney involved in the Ronald Greene case, has been promoted to General Counsel 2, earning $141,564.80 annually. This follows her demotion in June 2021 amid scrutiny over Greene's death. The promotion raises questions about accountability.">
police, Ronald Greene, Faye Morrison, General Counsel, police misconduct, accountability, DOJ investigation"> news/faye-morrison-promotion"> Police Attorney Involved in Ronald greene Case Promoted to general Counsel">
Police attorney involved in the Ronald Greene case, has been promoted to General Counsel 2, earning $141,564.80 annually. This follows her demotion in June 2021 amid scrutiny over Greene's death. The promotion raises questions about accountability.">
news/faye-morrison-promotion">
News Staff">
Louisiana State Police Attorney Involved in Ronald Greene Case Promoted to General Counsel
Table of Contents
Published: March 13, 2025
BATON ROUGE, La. – Faye Morrison, the attorney who headed the legal division at Louisiana State Police (LSP) during the controversial Ronald Greene case, has been reinstated to a top position within the agency. State Police payroll records confirm that Morrison was promoted to General counsel 2 on January 14, 2025, and is now earning an annual salary of $141,564.80. This promotion follows her demotion in June 2021, a move that occurred amidst the escalating fallout surrounding Greene’s death. The decision to elevate Morrison, given her past role and the intense scrutiny surrounding the Greene case, has ignited a fresh wave of controversy and renewed calls for accountability within the LSP.
The promotion of Morrison raises questions given her previous role and the controversies surrounding the Greene case.Her reassignment to attorney 3 in 2021, which included a $56,639 pay cut, was initiated by Colonel Lamar Davis, according to sources familiar with the matter. This action was taken as the agency faced intense scrutiny regarding the circumstances surrounding Greene’s death and the subsequent handling of the investigation. The demotion was widely perceived as a response to mounting public pressure and allegations of a cover-up.
Morrison’s initial removal from her leadership position stemmed from the exposure of emails she sent approximately a year and a half after Greene’s death. These emails, brought to light by Chief Investigator Chris Nakamoto, revealed correspondence between Morrison and then-Troop F Commander John Peters regarding Greene’s death being initially reported as a crash. The revelation of these emails added fuel to the already raging fire of public outrage and intensified demands for openness and justice.
The content of these emails sparked considerable concern. Peters wrote to Morrison, “Rough estimates indicate the impacts, sudden speed reduction and violent rotation of Greene’s vehicle generated approximately 19g’s of force…The detectives proved we did not cause the death.”
Morrison responded, “…This will definitely be critically important re cause of death and damages.”
The exchange suggested an attempt to frame Greene’s death as a result of the crash itself, rather than the actions of the state troopers.
The timing of this email exchange, occurring when questions about Greene’s death were already surfacing, raised concerns about the motivations behind the interaction. The subsequent release of body camera footage the following year revealed a stark contrast to the initial narrative. The video showed greene alive and apologetic after exiting his vehicle, before being subjected to a brutal beating that ultimately led to his death. The discrepancy between the initial reports and the video evidence further fueled accusations of a cover-up and sparked widespread condemnation of the LSP’s handling of the case.
The Committee Hearing
In response to the growing controversy,Governor John Bel Edwards established a committee to investigate the knowledge and actions of individuals within the State Police regarding the Greene case. Faye Morrison was called to testify before this committee in March 2022, during what was described as a heated and contentious hearing. The hearing provided a platform for lawmakers to directly confront Morrison and other LSP officials about their roles in the greene case and the alleged cover-up.
During the hearing,lawmakers expressed strong criticism of Morrison and other top LSP officials.Representative Jason Hughes stated directly to Morrison, “So many current and former members of the top brass have blood on your hands, and that’s just the facts.”
He and other committee members questioned her extensively about her knowledge of the events surrounding Greene’s death and the subsequent investigation.The lawmakers’ pointed questions and sharp rebukes underscored the gravity of the situation and the widespread public anger over the Greene case.
Morrison denied any knowledge of top leaders sanitizing their cell phones – restoring them to factory settings – despite admitting she helped write the retention schedule for public records at State Police. Representative Hughes openly questioned the veracity of her testimony,stating,“You made a comment where you said you never had a situation where evidence was destroyed which prompted you to implement this policy over cell phones. I would conjecture that’s not true.”
The exchange highlighted the deep skepticism surrounding Morrison’s testimony and the broader issue of transparency within the LSP.
Morrison defended her actions during the hearing, asserting that she had no involvement in the sanitization of cell phones and was unaware that it had occurred. “I just wanted to preserve what had been provided to us without any comment on it,”
morrison told lawmakers. “Other than yes it does go to causation,but without providing it to anyone or further any narrative.”
Her defense, though, did little to quell the concerns of lawmakers and the public, who remained deeply skeptical of her account of events.
Federal Investigation Finds Rights Violations
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) launched an extensive Pattern and Practice investigation into the LSP following Greene’s death. This investigation was prompted by allegations of racial bias and unfair targeting of minorities by state troopers. The federal investigation aimed to determine whether the LSP had engaged in systemic misconduct and whether its policies and practices violated the constitutional rights of citizens.
The DOJ’s findings were critical, concluding that LSP “engages in a pattern or practice of conduct that violates the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.”
The report further detailed that state police “uses excessive force, including unjustified uses of tasers, escalation of minor incidents, and use of force on people who did not pose a threat.”
The DOJ’s findings painted a damning picture of the LSP and its culture, highlighting the need for sweeping reforms to address the systemic issues that contributed to the Greene case and other instances of alleged misconduct.
State Police Response to Morrison’s Promotion
in response to inquiries regarding Morrison’s promotion, a spokesman for Louisiana State Police issued a statement, saying: “With the restructuring of positions within the Office of Legal Affairs to better serve the department, the position was posted and open to all qualified applicants. Mrs. Morrison has served the Department of Public Safety for nearly 15 years with no sustained discipline.Her professionalism, knowledge, and extensive experience more than qualify her for this position.Executive Counsel jason hessick, Colonel Hodges, and the entire Office of Legal Affairs have the utmost faith and confidence in Mrs. Morrison’s abilities and dedication to our department.”
The statement, though, did little to appease critics who argued that Morrison’s involvement in the Greene case should have disqualified her from consideration for the promotion.
Louisiana State Police’s Controversial Promotion: A Deep Dive into Accountability and Justice
Did the recent promotion of Faye Morrison, a key figure in the Ronald Greene case, signal a failure of justice within the Louisiana State Police?
Interviewer: Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading expert in law enforcement ethics and accountability, welcome to World Today News. The recent promotion of Faye Morrison to General Counsel at the Louisiana State Police has sparked outrage. Can you shed light on the importance of this appointment, especially given her previous involvement in the Ronald greene case?
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. The promotion of Ms. Morrison is indeed troubling and raises serious concerns about accountability within the Louisiana State Police (LSP). It suggests a potential disregard for the gravity of the Greene case and the broader issues of excessive force and the cover-up surrounding his death. her prior demotion, though seemingly a response to intensifying public scrutiny, was evidently insufficient to address the ethical breaches revealed during the investigation. The reinstatement not only undermines public trust in law enforcement reform but also sends a damaging signal. It raises the question of whether the LSP is truly committed to complete change and transparency.
Interviewer: The emails exchanged between Morrison and then-Troop F Commander John Peters, revealed by Chief Investigator Chris Nakamoto, played a meaningful role in the controversy.Can you elaborate on the implications of this correspondence?
Dr. Sharma: Absolutely. The emails detailing a purposeful misrepresentation of Ronald Greene’s death as a traffic accident represent a serious breach of ethical conduct and likely a violation of the law. This attempt to reshape the narrative before the full picture emerged is deeply concerning. The correspondence highlights a systemic attempt to obstruct justice and shield involved officers from accountability. Specifically, the exchange revealed an active effort to downplay the brutal nature of Greene’s death and create a more palatable scenario that avoided blame.this pattern underscores the need for robust measures to prevent such actions in the future. It’s a clear example of obfuscation, a strategy that attempts to confuse or deliberately mislead. It reveals a systematic approach of creating a false narrative to shield individuals within the police force.
Interviewer: The subsequent DOJ investigation found a pattern and practice of excessive force and Fourth Amendment violations within the LSP. How does Morrison’s promotion fit into this broader context?
Dr. Sharma: The DOJ findings paint a grim picture of systemic issues within the LSP. The problems are not isolated incidents; they represent deeply ingrained problems within the institution’s culture. Morrison’s promotion, in the wake of these findings, reinforces concerns about a lack of meaningful institutional reform. It illustrates a possible disconnect between stated commitment to change and actual actions. this makes genuine efforts at reform extremely challenging. The pattern of behaviour, as highlighted by the DOJ report, points towards a need for extensive training and oversight to address both the inappropriate response to incidents and the culture that encourages these behaviors. The LSP’s response to inquiries regarding ms. Morrison’s promotion seems rather dismissive of the grave concerns it raised in wider public discourse.
Interviewer: What specific recommendations would you propose to improve accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies, potentially preventing similar situations in the future?
Dr. Sharma: to promote accountability and prevent similar scandals, several actions must be taken. These include:
Enhanced Internal Affairs Processes: Robust and self-reliant internal affairs units are vital, capable of conducting thorough and impartial investigations free from political pressure.
Body-Worn Camera Policies: Clear, comprehensive, and consistently enforced policies regarding body-worn cameras are essential.
Independant Oversight boards: Civilian oversight boards, self-reliant of law enforcement, can provide an impartial assessment.
Increased Transparency: greater transparency in investigations and disciplinary actions, while protecting individual privacy appropriately, helps maintain public trust.
Whistleblower Protection: Strong legal protection for whistleblowers is crucial to incentivise reporting of misconduct.
Ultimately, the promotion of
Louisiana State PoliceS Shocking promotion: Justice Delayed, Justice Denied?
A controversial promotion within the Louisiana state Police has ignited a firestorm of criticism. Did the agency truly learn from the Ronald Greene case, or is this a blatant disregard for accountability?
Interviewer: Dr.Anya Sharma, a leading expert in law enforcement ethics and accountability, welcome to World Today News. The recent promotion of Faye Morrison to General Counsel at the Louisiana State Police has sparked outrage. Can you shed light on the importance of this appointment, especially given her previous involvement in the Ronald Greene case?
Dr. Sharma: Thank you for having me. The promotion of Ms. Morrison is deeply troubling and raises serious questions about the Louisiana State Police’s (LSP) commitment to accountability and transparency. Her role in the Ronald Greene case, specifically her involvement in the initial misrepresentation of his death, casts a long shadow over this appointment. The LSP’s decision to reinstate her to a senior position, especially given her previous demotion amidst the scandal, suggests a potential disregard for the gravity of the situation and the broader issues of excessive force and systemic misconduct within the department. This isn’t just about Ms. Morrison; it’s about sending a clear message—a message that undermines public trust in law enforcement reform and hinders efforts toward real, meaningful change.
Interviewer: The emails exchanged between Morrison and then-Troop F Commander John Peters, revealed by Chief Investigator Chris Nakamoto, played a crucial role in this controversy. Can you elaborate on the implications of this correspondence?
Dr. Sharma: The emails between Morrison and Peters, revealing a concerted effort to portray Ronald Greene’s death as an accident rather than a brutal beating, are damning. This attempt to manipulate the narrative before the full facts emerged represents a stark breach of ethics and likely a violation of the law. The implications are far-reaching. The correspondence demonstrates not only a lack of accountability, but also a potential cover-up, hindering justice for Mr. Greene and his family. It highlights a disturbing pattern of behavior, demonstrating a systematic approach to obfuscating the truth and protecting involved officers from accountability. This pattern underscores the need for robust measures to prevent similar actions in the future. Such obfuscation—the deliberate obscuring of the truth—is detrimental to a just legal system.
Interviewer: The subsequent Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation found a pattern and practice of excessive force and Fourth Amendment violations within the LSP. How does Morrison’s promotion fit into this broader context?
Dr. Sharma: The DOJ’s findings reveal a systemic problem within the LSP,not merely isolated incidents. The culture of the agency appears deeply entrenched in problematic practices. Morrison’s promotion, in light of these findings, amplifies concerns about a lack of meaningful institutional reform. It suggests a disconnect between the LSP’s stated commitment to change and their actual actions. This lack of alignment severely impedes genuine efforts at reform. The pattern of behavior detailed in the DOJ report emphasizes the need for far-reaching training, increased oversight, and a complete cultural shift within the department to address both the use of excessive force and the culture that enables such behaviors. The agency’s response to the outcry over Ms. Morrison’s promotion further underscores this disconnect.
Interviewer: What specific recommendations would you propose to improve accountability and transparency within law enforcement agencies, preventing similar situations in the future?
dr. Sharma: To enhance accountability and prevent future scandals,a multi-pronged approach is necessary.This includes:
Enhanced Internal Affairs processes: Self-reliant and robust internal affairs units are crucial, capable of conducting impartial investigations free from external influence.
Body-Worn Camera Policies: Clear, consistently enforced policies regarding body-worn cameras are essential, ensuring footage is properly collected, stored, and used in investigations.
Independent Oversight Boards: Civilian oversight boards, independent of law enforcement agencies, can provide objective assessments of misconduct allegations.
Increased Transparency: Greater transparency in investigations and disciplinary actions, while preserving individual privacy rights, fosters public trust in the justice system.
* Whistleblower Protection: Strong legal protections for whistleblowers encourage reporting of misconduct within law enforcement agencies.
Interviewer: Thank you, Dr. Sharma, for these insightful and crucial insights.
Dr. Sharma: your welcome. This is a critical conversation, and it’s vital that we as a society demand reform and accountability from our law enforcement agencies.
Concluding Thoughts: The promotion of Faye Morrison highlights deep-seated issues within the LSP. Implementing the recommendations above is essential to restoring public trust and ensuring justice. What are your thoughts? Share your comments below and join the conversation on social media using #lspaccountability.