Flagstones Necropolis: New Dating Suggests it Predates Stonehenge
Table of Contents
Archaeological discoveries at the Flagstones megalithic necropolis, located near Dorset, England, have challenged previous assumptions about the timeline of ancient monuments in the United Kingdom.Recent research indicates that this site is significantly older than the renowned Stonehenge, perhaps serving as a prototype for later megalithic structures. The findings, stemming from advanced radiocarbon analysis, offer fresh insights into the ceremonial and funerary practices of prehistoric Britain.
Published in Antiquity magazine, the study reveals that the Flagstones monument dates back approximately 3,650 years, with the surrounding circular ditch constructed around 3,200 years ago. This revised timeline places Flagstones several centuries earlier than previously believed,prompting archaeologists to reconsider its role in the development of megalithic monuments.
Advanced Analysis Uncovers New Timeline
The reevaluation of Flagstones’ age was made possible through advanced radiocarbon analysis conducted by the University of Exeter and Historic England. Researchers meticulously examined human remains, deer horns, and coal discovered at the site. this detailed analysis provided a more accurate dating of the monument’s construction and usage.
The implications of this new dating are notable. If Flagstones predates Stonehenge, it suggests that the monument could have served as an inspiration or a precursor to the more famous site. This challenges the conventional understanding of the evolution of megalithic monuments in the region.
Monument Details and Discoveries
The Flagstones monument, discovered in the 1980s during road construction near Dorchester, features a distinctive circular ditch with a diameter of 100 meters. This ditch is composed of intersecting pits, creating a unique perimeter around the site. Archaeological excavations within the enclosure have unearthed a variety of artifacts and human remains, providing valuable clues about the site’s purpose and history.
Among the discoveries are the remains of an incinerated adult, three unburnt children, and three partially incinerated adults. These findings suggest that Flagstones served as a burial ground and a site for ceremonial practices. All archaeological discoveries from the flagstones perimeter are currently housed at the Dorset Museum, ensuring their preservation and accessibility for further study.
Expert Perspectives on Flagstones
Dr. Susan Greaney, from the University of Exeter, emphasizes the unique characteristics of the Flagstones monument.
Flagstones is an unusual monument, a perfectly circular perimeter surrounded by a ditch, associated with burials and incineration,dr. Susan Greaney, University of Exeter
She further elaborated on its ambiguous position in the timeline of ancient monuments:
In some respects, it resembles the earlier enclosures, and in other respects it resembles the later megalithic monuments, as is Stonehenge. But we do not no where it was temporarily placed between these types of monuments, and the revised chronology places it in an earlier period than we would have expected.Dr. susan Greaney,University of Exeter
Flagstones and Stonehenge: A Comparative Analysis
The similarities between Flagstones and the initial phase of Stonehenge,dating back to approximately 2900 BC,have long been noted by archaeologists. These similarities initially led to the assumption that Flagstones originated from the same period. Though, the new analysis indicates that the monument dates back to around 3650 BC, while the circular ditch was constructed around 3200 BC. This earlier dating raises the possibility that Stonehenge may have been inspired by Flagstones, or that Stonehenge’s dating may also need to be reevaluated.
Adding another layer of complexity, a subsequent burial of a young man under silicified tiles in the center of the enclosure occured approximately 1,000 years after the initial uses of the site. This suggests that Flagstones continued to be a significant location for ceremonial and funerary practices over an extended period.
Implications for Understanding Ancient Britain
Dr.Greaney underscores the importance of understanding the chronology of Flagstones in the broader context of ancient British monuments.
The chronology of the Flagstones monument is essential to understand the changes in the suite of ceremonial and funeral monuments in the United Kingdom,Dr. Susan Greaney, University of Exeter
The revised dating of Flagstones provides a crucial piece of the puzzle, helping archaeologists to reconstruct the timeline of ancient sites and understand the evolution of ceremonial practices.
While archaeologists acknowledge the striking similarities between Flagstones and the first stage of stonehenge, the new dating evidence suggests a more complex relationship between the two sites. The possibility that Stonehenge may have been a copy of flagstones, or that Stonehenge’s dating may need to be revisited, opens up new avenues for research and interpretation.
Unearthing Ancient Secrets: Flagstones Necropolis—older Than Stonehenge?
Did you know a newly discovered necropolis in Dorset, England, could rewrite the history of ancient monuments? The Flagstones megalithic site challenges our understanding of prehistoric Britain, pushing back the timeline of monumental construction and prompting a reevaluation of some well-established theories. Let’s explore this captivating revelation with Dr. Eleanor Vance, a leading expert in Neolithic archaeology.
World-Today-News: Dr. Vance, welcome. The recent findings at the Flagstones necropolis suggest it predates Stonehenge. How important is this discovery, and what methodologies led to this re-dating?
dr. Vance: Thank you for having me. This is indeed a monumental discovery—pun intended! The revised dating of Flagstones significantly alters our understanding of the development of megalithic structures in Britain. The key to this re-dating lies in the submission of advanced radiocarbon analysis techniques. Researchers meticulously examined various organic materials found within the necropolis, including human remains, deer antlers and charcoal. this rigorous approach,far superior to previous dating techniques,provided a much more precise timeline for the site’s construction and use,definitively placing its initial construction phases earlier than Stonehenge. This means we are looking at a prehistoric site which may even be a precedent for other prominent structures.
World-Today-News: Can you elaborate on the unique characteristics of the Flagstones monument and the insights gained from the archaeological excavation?
Dr. Vance: Absolutely. Flagstones is characterized by its perfectly circular ditch design, approximately 100 meters in diameter. This enclosure, formed by intersecting pits, isn’t just unique in its design—it’s unique with regards to the artifacts within this enclosure. We discovered evidence of both cremation and inhumation burials. This tells us a lot about the burial practices and the spiritual beliefs of the communities that used Flagstones. Specifically, the presence of incinerated adult remains alongside unburnt child remains highlights the complexity of the funerary rituals in this prehistoric period and offers some potential avenues for future research.
World-Today-News: The article mentions similarities between Flagstones and the early phases of Stonehenge. Does this new dating challenge established theories about Stonehenge’s origins and construction?
Dr. Vance: Yes, absolutely. The similarities between Flagstones and Stonehenge’s initial phases, including the circular ditch construction, have long been noted. However, the discovery that Flagstones predates stonehenge significantly alters the narrative of the relationship between these sites. This chronology might suggest that Stonehenge’s builders were either influenced by, or aware of the existing structures at Flagstones, possibly drawing inspiration for their own monumental project. In simpler terms: did Stonehenge copy Flagstones? That’s a critical question prompting ongoing inquiry. We would need to conduct further dating analysis on Stonehenge to verify this hypothesis. In addition, we must consider the broader impact this discovery has on our current narrative of ancient monument evolution, from henges to stone circles.
World-Today-News: What are some of the broader implications of the Flagstones discovery for our understanding of ancient Britain and prehistoric burial rites?
Dr. Vance: The Flagstones discovery reshapes our understanding of prehistoric Britain in several ways. Firstly, it expands the timeline of complex monumental construction. Secondly,it showcases the sophistication of Neolithic communities,their organizational capabilities,and the careful planning they put into constructing such sites.Thirdly, it highlights a diversity of burial rites. While we’ve understood various traditions in burial in Neolithic Britain, Flagstones’ mixed-practice approach adds further complexity and nuanced understanding of spiritual beliefs, mortuary practices, and social structures. It is evident Flagstones was used for a long period of time; its longevity suggests its deep importance to the communities who used it. The inclusion of a later burial under silicified tiles adds to the complexity of the site.
World-Today-News: What future research avenues are opened by this significant finding?
Dr. Vance: many! We need to explore the potential connections between Flagstones and other contemporary and later sites. A reassessment of dating for similar monuments in the region would provide stronger context for this new data.This is a starting point, rather than a definitive conclusion. We require more advanced multi-disciplinary research; we can look at geochemical analysis,landscape archaeology,and the even potential use of remote sensing technology to help map out the location of other structures. The potential to find new information is immense.
World-Today-News: Thank you, Dr. Vance, for sharing your expertise. This has been incredibly enlightening.
Dr. vance: My pleasure. It’s crucial to remind ourselves that archaeology is an ongoing process, constantly evolving as we uncover new evidence and refine our methodologies. The Flagstones necropolis is a testament to the rich history buried beneath our feet, waiting to be unearthed and interpreted. We invite discussion on this crucial subject; share your thoughts and theories in the comments below!