Home » Health » Hospital Protocols Gone Awry: The Harrowing Journey from Quick Recovery to Forced DNR and Remdesivir Use

Hospital Protocols Gone Awry: The Harrowing Journey from Quick Recovery to Forced DNR and Remdesivir Use

Connecticut Widow Seeks Justice After Husband’s COVID-19 Death at Danbury Hospital

Published

The COVID-19 pandemic’s early days brought unprecedented challenges, and for Angela Michilli, March 2020 marked the beginning of a personal tragedy. Her husband, Ralph, who worked at a car dealership just across the Connecticut state line in New York, contracted the virus and was admitted to Danbury Hospital. Angela alleges that a series of questionable medical decisions and restrictive protocols ultimately led to Ralph’s death, and she is now seeking justice. Ralph’s ordeal began on March 31, 2020, when he developed severe body aches and chills.

What started as a seemingly manageable illness quickly escalated. Angela and thier daughter also contracted COVID-19. As Ralph’s condition worsened, Angela desperately sought treatment, specifically requesting hydroxychloroquine and other medications.She claims she faced resistance and delays,which she attributes to rapidly changing protocols and fear-driven restrictions.By April 9, Ralph’s condition had deteriorated to the point where Angela was forced to call 911. That was the last time she saw him alive outside of the hospital walls.

Upon arrival at Danbury Hospital,Ralph was promptly admitted and isolated.Angela’s pleas to remain by his side were denied, a common practice during the pandemic’s peak to prevent the spread of the virus. Initially, doctors provided optimistic reports, indicating that Ralph was responsive, receiving oxygen, and being administered fluids. However, this brief period of hope was short-lived, according to Michilli.

Within an hour, Angela received a call informing her that Ralph needed to be intubated. Despite her objections, the doctors insisted that intubation was the only way to save him. Angela believes this decision marked the beginning of Ralph’s rapid decline. She vividly recalls the conversation:

Admited into the​ ED,coherent,verbal; everything good on intake; one hour later thay called and ​siad my husband ​must be intubated right then,to make it easier for him to breath!

Throughout Ralph’s hospitalization, Angela struggled to obtain consistent and reliable information about his condition. Communication was sparse and often contradictory. She fought tirelessly for updates, only to be met with vague reassurances or grim prognoses. Adding to her distress, Ralph was administered Remdesivir, a drug that Angela later discovered had severe side effects, including kidney failure. Remdesivir was one of the frist drugs authorized for emergency use in treating COVID-19, but its efficacy and potential side effects were subjects of ongoing debate within the medical community.

Over the ensuing days, Ralph’s condition fluctuated, with brief moments of stability followed by devastating setbacks. His kidneys ultimately failed,necessitating dialysis. Despite these interventions, his health continued to decline. The situation became increasingly dire, leaving Angela in a state of constant anxiety and despair. The use of dialysis highlighted the severity of Ralph’s condition and the challenges doctors faced in managing the complications arising from COVID-19.

The call Angela had been dreading came on April 21. The doctor informed her that Ralph was not going to survive and urged her to come to the hospital immediately.By the time Angela and her daughter arrived, Ralph had already passed away. They were finally allowed to see him, but only in death. Angela remembers how peaceful he looked, but the pain of not being able to hold his hand during his final moments continues to haunt her. The inability to be with loved ones during their final moments was a common and heartbreaking experience for many families during the pandemic.

Angela believes that Ralph’s death was not an isolated incident but rather a consequence of broader systemic issues within the hospital system. She contends that hospitals adhered to rigid guidelines, heavily influenced by government incentives and pharmaceutical interests, which prioritized profit over patient care. According to Angela, patients like Ralph were isolated, denied choice treatments, and subjected to drugs like Remdesivir, which often led to severe complications and death. She stated:

My husband got covid in early 2020, before vaccines, and before we knew much about​ it-within one hour of his admission he was steadfast to be positive; Dr says “begin protocol” and he ‍was​ immediately intubated! Remdesivir began the next day in the ICU.

Angela’s story is one of over 1,300 documented by the COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (CHBMP), a mission of the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation. Over 900 of these stories have already been published, and new ones continue to emerge. These accounts collectively paint a disturbing picture of countless lives lost not only to COVID-19 but also to what some perceive as inhumane policies and protocols enforced in hospitals across the nation. The CHBMP aims to provide a platform for these stories and advocate for accountability.

The CHBMP is dedicated to exposing these alleged crimes against humanity and advocating for accountability. A Task Force, comprised of victims, widows, and survivors like Angela, is working to bring these issues to light. Their mission is to prevent these practices from continuing and to ensure that no other families endure similar pain and loss. The organization seeks to raise awareness and push for investigations into the medical protocols used during the pandemic.

The remembrance Project serves as a living archive, documenting the stories of individuals impacted during the pandemic. if you or a loved one has been affected by COVID-related hospital protocols or policies, the CHBMP encourages you to share your story at CHBMP.org. By adding your voice, you can contribute to this growing movement aimed at shedding light on these injustices and demanding accountability. The project hopes to create a extensive record of the pandemic’s impact and to learn lessons that can improve future healthcare responses.

If you have a story to share, please submit it to the Remembrance Project. Together, we can work towards preventing such tragedies from happening again.

COVID-19 Hospital Protocols: A Widow’s Grief Fuels a Fight for Accountability

Over 1,300 documented cases highlight the devastating consequences of alleged inhumane hospital policies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Were these practices truly unavoidable, or were systemic failures at play?

Interviewer (Senior Editor, world-today-news.com): Dr. Evelyn Reed, a leading expert in medical ethics and healthcare policy, welcome to world-today-news.com. The tragic story of Angela Michilli and her late husband, Ralph, raises serious questions about hospital protocols during the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. Can you offer some insight into the challenges faced by hospitals,and the potential ethical dilemmas that arose?

Dr. Reed: Thank you for having me. The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Hospitals were overwhelmed, facing shortages of staff, beds, and critical resources. The rapid spread of the virus forced institutions to implement strict infection control measures, including isolation protocols. These measures, while intended to prevent further spread, understandably caused significant distress for patients and their families.

Interviewer: Angela alleges that restrictive visitation policies prevented her from being with Ralph during his final moments. How common was this practise, and what were the ethical considerations behind it?

Dr. Reed: Sadly,limited visitation was a widespread practice in many hospitals during the pandemic’s peak. The rationale was based on the need to protect healthcare workers and other patients from infection. However, the ethical implications were considerable. Denying families the prospect to provide comfort and support to their loved ones during their final hours raises serious questions about the balance between infection control and the ethical obligation to provide compassionate care. This underscores the need for clear, evidence-based guidelines that address both public health and patient well-being.

Interviewer: Angela also claims that she faced resistance when requesting specific treatments for Ralph, specifically mentioning hydroxychloroquine. How prevalent were debates around treatment protocols during this period,and what impact might these have had on patient outcomes?

dr. Reed: The early days of the pandemic were characterized by significant uncertainty regarding effective COVID-19 treatments. There was a lack of robust clinical evidence to guide treatment decisions, leading to widespread debates and varying approaches among healthcare professionals. Hydroxychloroquine,such as,initially generated significant interest,but subsequent studies did not support its use as an effective treatment.This underscores the importance of ethical decision-making based on the best available scientific evidence, with clear interaction to patients and their families about treatment choices and their potential benefits and risks.

Interviewer: Angela believes that drugs like Remdesivir, while authorized for emergency use, may have contributed to Ralph’s decline. What are the key considerations surrounding the use of experimental treatments in a crisis situation?

Dr. Reed: The use of experimental treatments in a public health crisis always presents ethical complexities. Regulatory agencies often grant emergency use authorizations for medications when the potential benefits outweigh the known risks, especially in situations where no proven treatments are available. However,clarity and informed consent are paramount. Patients and their families should receive clear and accessible explanations about the risks and potential benefits of any experimental treatment. Ongoing monitoring and rigorous evaluation of such treatments are critical to assess their effectiveness and safety.

Interviewer: The COVID Humanity Betrayal Memory Project (CHBMP) aims to document similar experiences and advocate for accountability. What steps can be taken to prevent similar tragedies in future pandemics?

Dr. Reed: The CHBMP’s work is invaluable in raising awareness and fostering discussions on the ethical implications of pandemic response.To prevent similar situations in the future, several key steps are essential:

Develop clear and evidence-based protocols for managing pandemics: These protocols should consider both public health needs and the ethical dimensions of patient care.

Prioritize open communication and shared decision-making: Patients and their families must be involved in treatment decisions, with transparent information shared about both benefits and risks.

Establish robust systems for data collection and analysis: This will enable a more detailed understanding of the impact of various policies and approaches.

Prioritize the provision of psychosocial support: Providing complete mental health support to families affected by similar crises is critical.

Interviewer: Dr.Reed, thank you for sharing your expertise. Your insightful answers illuminate critical ethical and practical aspects of the pandemic’s impact on patients and their families. This interview highlights the need for rigorous inquiry, improved communication, and a renewed commitment to compassionate and ethical healthcare practices.

What are your thoughts? Share your perspectives in the comments below, and join the conversation on social media using #COVIDEthics #HospitalProtocols #PandemicLessons.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.