Kīlauea eruption: Community Smells Frist Degassing, HVO tracks Variable emissions
Table of Contents
Published:
The eruption of Kīlauea volcano, which began on September 15, 2024, presented unique challenges for scientists at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO). Initial poor weather conditions hampered traditional monitoring methods, leading to an unexpected reliance on local residents to detect the first signs of eruptive degassing. The eruption, located west of Puʻuʻōʻō, experienced fluctuating sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions before abruptly ceasing on September 20, 2024. This event underscores the importance of community involvement in volcanic monitoring.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89514/895144f5001b2d43265fa4816724d1bbb571bdd6" alt="USGS scientist measuring volcanic gas"
The onset of the eruption was obscured by a “dark and stormy night,” rendering HVO’s webcams ineffective due to poor visibility. Compounding the issue, the southerly wind direction prevented HVO’s gas monitoring stations from detecting any initial eruptive degassing. This combination of factors meant that traditional scientific instruments were initially unable to provide timely details about the eruption.
In a surprising turn of events, the first indication of the eruption came from the residents of Volcano, Hawai’i. Community members reported detecting “sulfurous odors and burning smells” via social media. This grassroots detection proved crucial in alerting HVO to the potential eruption, highlighting the value of community observations in volcanic monitoring. The residents’ reports served as an early warning system, demonstrating the importance of local knowledge in such situations.
Despite these community reports, some HVO staff members living in the area only smelled burning, without detecting sulfur. Their gas badges “didn’t register SO2 (sulfur dioxide) above background.” The presence of residual hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from the inactive Puʻuʻōʻō area, exacerbated by the rainy conditions, further complex the situation. As the report stated, “even amidst community reports of sulfur smells, we couldn’t be fully sure if there was an eruption.” This highlights the challenges in differentiating between background volcanic gases and new eruptive activity.
The weather cleared on September 16, allowing HVO to visually confirm the eruption. The initial SO2 emission rate was measured at approximately 300 tonnes per day (t/d), suggesting a relatively small eruption.However, this was short-lived. By September 17, the eruption had intensified, with SO2 emissions soaring to nearly 12,000 t/d. The winds shifted, allowing one of HVO’s East Rift Zone gas monitoring stations to “detect a whiff of the SO2 as well.” By that afternoon, emissions decreased to about 3,500 t/d as the lava fountaining weakened. Emissions were similar, around 2,000 t/d, the next morning, September 18.
The eruption’s intensity continued to fluctuate. Later on September 18, activity escalated again, reflected in increasing SO2 emissions. HVO scientists, using an ultraviolet (UV) camera, observed a more intense plume. gas scientists then “switched back to more reliable UV spectrometer measurements,” revealing a progressive increase in SO2 emission rate over the course of the afternoon. In conjunction with the opening of new fissures and the progress of ‘lava falls’ cascading over Nāpau Crater rim, emissions increased from 5,000 t/d at about 3:30 p.m. to roughly 12,000 t/d at 5:00 p.m.
The peak of the eruption occurred on September 19, with SO2 emissions reaching approximately 30,000 t/d. Though, the eruption was short-lived. By September 20, it was over, with SO2 emissions plummeting to only 800 t/d. HVO gas scientists were able to measure gases from the last gasp of lava earlier that morning using an infrared spectrometer. The gases were low in carbon dioxide (CO2), and thus derived from magma that previously lost CO2 while in the shallow magma plumbing system before eruption, similar to other Kīlauea East Rift Zone eruptions and recent Kīlauea summit eruptions.
A final SO2 emission rate measured on September 21 showed that just under 100 t/d of SO2 were being emitted from the inactive fissures.By September 23, SO2 emissions from the Nāpau fissures were undetectable on Chain of Craters Road.
The HVO utilized a range of instruments to track the variable gas emissions, including a UV spectrometer, a UV camera, permanent stations, and an infrared spectrometer. Despite this technological arsenal, the initial detection of the eruption was credited to the residents of Volcano. As the report concludes, “even though HVO was ultimately able to track the variable gas emissions throughout the Nāpau eruption with our UV spectrometer, a UV camera, permanent stations, and an infrared spectrometer, we certainly know we weren’t the first to sniff the gases from the Nāpau eruption – that honor still goes to the residents of Volcano!” This highlights the importance of integrating community observations with scientific monitoring for effective volcanic hazard assessment.
Volcano Activity Updates
Kīlauea has been erupting intermittently within the summit caldera as of December 23, 2024. Its USGS Volcano Alert level is WATCH.
The summit eruption at Kīlauea volcano that began in Halemaʻumaʻu crater on December 23 continued over the past week, with one eruptive episode. Episode 11 was active from the night of February 25 until the morning of February 26. Kīlauea summit has been inflating as episode 11 ended,suggesting that another eruptive episode is absolutely possible. Sulfur dioxide emission rates are elevated in the summit region during active eruption episodes. No unusual activity has been noted along Kīlauea’s East Rift Zone or Southwest Rift Zone.
Mauna Loa is not erupting. Its USGS Volcano Alert Level is at NORMAL.
Three earthquakes were reported felt in the Hawaiian Islands during the past week: a M3.4 earthquake 14 km (8 mi) S of Volcano at 0 km (0 mi) depth on Feb.27 at 3:33 a.m.HST, a M3.3 earthquake 16 km (9 mi) W of Kailua-Kona at 14 km (8 mi) depth on Feb.23 at 9:31 p.m. HST, and a M2.7 earthquake 13 km (8 mi) NNE of Hawaiian Ocean View at 9 km (5 mi) depth on Feb. 20 at 7:36 a.m. HST.
HVO continues to closely monitor Kīlauea and Mauna Loa.
KīlaueaS Whispers: Unmasking Volcanic Secrets Through Community & Science
Did you know that the initial detection of a recent Kīlauea eruption wasn’t by elegant scientific instruments, but by the keen senses of local residents? This incredible story highlights the crucial role of community observation in volcanic monitoring and underscores the complex interplay between technology and human perception in understanding volcanic activity. Let’s delve deeper with Dr. Alana Reyes, a leading volcanologist specializing in Hawaiian volcanic systems.
World-Today-News.com: Dr. Reyes, the recent Kīlauea eruption showcased an unprecedented reliance on community reports for initial detection.Can you elaborate on the significance of this event?
Dr. Reyes: Absolutely. The Kīlauea eruption highlighted a critical aspect often overlooked in volcanic monitoring: the invaluable role of local knowledge. While sophisticated instruments like UV spectrometers, infrared spectrometers, and gas monitoring stations are essential for precise measurements and comprehensive data collection regarding volcanic gas emissions, they can be hampered by factors like weather and geographical limitations. In this instance, adverse weather conditions initially rendered many of the high-tech monitoring tools ineffective. The residents’ keen observation of sulfurous odors and burning smells provided the earliest warning, proving that community engagement is a critical component of a robust early warning system for volcanic activity. This underscores the need for integrating community-based observation with established scientific monitoring techniques for improved volcanic hazard assessment.
World-Today-News.com: How can communities be effectively integrated into volcanic monitoring programs? what steps can be taken to harness thier valuable observations?
Dr. Reyes: There are several key steps to effectively incorporate community observations into volcanic monitoring:
Establish clear communication channels: This could involve creating dedicated social media groups, establishing community liaison programs, or using existing communication networks to facilitate the rapid reporting of unusual observations.
Educate the community: Training programs that educate residents on identifying potential signs of volcanic unrest, such as changes in gas emissions (like sulfur dioxide or hydrogen sulfide), ground deformation, or unusual seismic activity, are essential.
Develop a standardized reporting system: A simple, user-kind system for reporting unusual observations, including location, time, and a description of the observed phenomenon, improves data quality and analysis. This also aids in filtering out false positives.
Build trust and collaboration: Open communication and collaboration between scientists and community members are paramount. Scientists should actively solicit feedback and share their findings with the community to foster trust and encourage continued participation.
World-Today-News.com: The eruption demonstrated fluctuating sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions. What factors contribute to this variability, and what does it tell us about the eruption dynamics?
Dr. Reyes: Fluctuations in SO2 emissions during volcanic eruptions are common and reflect changes in the magma supply rate, conduit pressure, and the interaction between magma and groundwater. A higher SO2 emission rate, as observed during the peak of the eruption, often indicates increased magma ascent and a more vigorous eruption. Conversely, a decrease may signal a waning eruption or changes in the pathways through which magma is released. Understanding these variations is crucial for accurately assessing the eruption’s intensity and potential hazards. Analyzing these patterns helps volcanologists better understand the plumbing systems of volcanoes and predict future behavior, contributing to more effective hazard mitigation strategies and public safety.
World-Today-News.com: What technological advancements are enhancing volcanic monitoring capabilities?
Dr. Reyes: Recent technological advancements have significantly improved our ability to monitor volcanoes. These include:
Remote sensing technologies: Satellites and drones equipped with various sensors provide real-time data on gas emissions,thermal anomalies,and ground deformation,even in remote or hazardous areas.
Improved seismic networks: Dense seismic networks provide more precise locations and magnitudes of earthquakes, improving our understanding of magma movement and providing early warnings of potential eruptions.
Advanced gas monitoring systems: Sophisticated gas sensors and remote sensing instruments provide more accurate and continuous measurements of volcanic gas emissions.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning: These technologies are increasingly being used to analyze large datasets from various monitoring tools, allowing for better pattern recognition, anomaly detection, and more accurate eruption forecasting.
world-Today-News.com: What are the key takeaways from this Kīlauea event for future volcanic monitoring efforts?
Dr. Reyes: The Kīlauea eruption serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of:
Integrating community observations into scientific monitoring programs.
Developing robust and resilient monitoring systems that can withstand various challenges, including adverse weather conditions.
Continuously advancing the technology used for volcanic monitoring.
Promoting greater public awareness and understanding of volcanic hazards.
World-Today-News.com: Thank you, Dr. Reyes, for your insightful perspectives. This has been incredibly valuable.
Dr. Reyes: My pleasure. Understanding volcanic activity requires a collaborative effort involving sophisticated technology and the keen observations of those living closest to these powerful forces of nature. Let’s continue the conversation in the comments below.Share your thoughts and experiences!