The crossfit Rebellion: Elite Athletes Boycott Open 2025 Amidst Deepening Controversy
Table of Contents
A meaningful rift has emerged within the CrossFit community as the declaration of CrossFit Open Workout 25.1 approaches. Several elite athletes, boasting a combined 42 Games appearances, 33 Games event wins, 11 Games podium finishes, and two Games championships, have publicly declared they will skip the 2025 CrossFit Open and Games season entirely. This unprecedented boycott follows the November 20, 2024, announcement by CrossFit HQ regarding the conclusion of the third-party inquiry into the death of Lazar Ðukić at the 2024 CrossFit Games.
CrossFit HQ’s refusal to release any details or findings from the examination fueled the fire. Instead,they unveiled a six-point plan for the 2025 season,including retaining Dave Castro in his current position and appointing a “senior Safety Leader” reporting to Castro,not the other way around. The plan also included the creation of an “Athlete Council,” separate from the existing Professional Fitness Athletes Association (PFAA).
This response sparked immediate backlash. Athletes like Freya Moosebrugger, Annie Thorisdottir, Julia Kato, and Cody Anderson voiced their criticism on social media. Eik Gylfadottir commented, “This is simply not good enough! No accountability, hopeless suggestions completely out of sync with what the athletes are requesting. Want to repair? How about starting by honoring your promise of transparency,”
Luka Ðukić,in a notably strong statement,declared: “No investigation can reveal anything other than the fact that ther was no reaction when it was needed.”
He urged followers to “think carefully”
before participating in the Open or paying affiliate fees, viewing CrossFit LLC as “a company that does not value human life.”
Ðukić’s post was widely shared,amplifying the discontent.The subsequent announcement of changes for the 2025 season only deepened the dissatisfaction among many community members and elite athletes. Emma Tall, in a December interview on the Athlete Zone Podcast, stated: “I haven’t spoken about this at all, but I’m most likely not going to do that. but if my lat is good enough,I will do (TYR) Wodapalooza in January,”
citing CrossFit HQ’s inadequate response to the PFAA’s demands as her reason for skipping the Games season.
Athletes Drop out of the 2025 CrossFit Open
By January, the boycott gained significant momentum. Annie Thorisdottir, in an interview with the Buttery Bros at TYR Wodapalooza in Miami, announced she would not be competing in the CrossFit open for the first time as its inception. “I have been a part of the CrossFit Open as the first time it started, and this will be the first time I will not be taking part in the CrossFit Open,”
she stated. Elisa Fuliano echoed this sentiment, citing Lazar Ðukić’s death and the lack of accountability as her reasons. “After a lot of thinking, I’ve come to the decision that I won’t be signing up for the Open this year,”
she wrote.
Chandler smith and Pat Vellner also publicly declared their withdrawal from the 2025 CrossFit Games season. Smith stated: “Today I’m using my voice and following it up with action: I will not be competing in the 2025 crossfit Games season.”
Vellner added: “I’ve decided not to compete in the 2025 CrossFit Games season. sometimes, the best way to push for change is to take action, and this year I’m taking a stand by voting with my feet.”
Jelle Hoste followed suit, declaring: “Silence doesn’t drive change – action does. That’s why I won’t be competing in the 2025 CrossFit games season.”
Despite repeated attempts,CrossFit HQ has not responded to requests for comment. While some athletes have publicly supported the Open, the boycott represents a significant challenge to CrossFit’s authority and highlights deep-seated concerns within the community. The deadline for the first Open workout submission is Monday, March 3, with registration remaining open until March 17. The coming weeks will reveal the full extent of participation in the 2025 CrossFit Open.
The CrossFit Rebellion: Elites Boycott Open 2025 Amidst Deepening Controversy
Headline: CrossFit Rebellion Unfolds: Elite Athletes Boycott Over Safety and Clarity Concerns
Opening Thought: A pivotal moment emerges as four-time Games champion Annie Thorisdottir pledges to boycott the crossfit Open, marking a meaningful fracture within the CrossFit community. What led to this unprecedented conflict, and what do these resignations mean for the future of CrossFit?
Interview with Dr. Alexandra Greene,CrossFit Culture and Governance expert
Senior Editor: Dr.Greene, welcome. The recent declarations from elite CrossFit athletes to boycott the 2025 Open have sent shockwaves through the fitness community. Can you shed light on the underlying issues driving this significant movement?
Dr. Greene: Thank you for having me. The movement is born out of a profound sense of dissatisfaction and frustration. The athletes’ grievances center around the response to the tragic death of Lazar Ðukić at the 2024 CrossFit Games and CrossFit HQ’s handling of safety reforms. elite athletes are demanding accountability, transparency, and meaningful action following this incident.The lack of detailed findings from the third-party inquiry into Ðukić’s death was a significant trigger. It was perceived as an attempt to dodge duty and silence objections, further fueling the boycott. This controversy isn’t just about a single event; it reflects growing concerns over athlete safety, leadership accountability, and community involvement in organizational decisions.
senior Editor: You mentioned that transparency was a key issue.What can CrossFit HQ do to address these concerns and possibly reverse the boycott movement?
dr. greene: CrossFit HQ’s course of action requires basic changes. First and foremost, they must commit to full transparency regarding the investigations and implement accountable safety measures. Historical precedent shows that fostering a culture of openness can considerably improve trust within professional communities. Indeed, whistleblowing studies from industries such as finance and pharmaceuticals highlight the importance of transparency in rebuilding trust. For CrossFit, establishing a truly self-reliant “Athlete Council” that holds significant influence over safety protocols and decisions—unfiltered from existing power structures—could be a transformative step. Additionally, senior leadership like Dave Castro must demonstrate a shift in prioritizing athlete welfare over hierarchy or tradition.
Senior Editor: Beyond addressing transparency, what role does leadership play in this controversy, and could their strategic decisions impact the long-term reputation of CrossFit?
Dr. Greene: Leadership plays a pivotal role. The way Dave Castro and CrossFit HQ respond—or fail to respond—can significantly impact their reputation. Strong leadership recognizes that listening to athlete voices is not just beneficial but essential. Elizabeth Bennet’s critique in “Pride and Prejudice,” emphasizing effective communication within leadership dynamics,aptly applies here. by not just incorporating athlete feedback but also acting upon it decisively, CrossFit can rebuild its image as a community that values its participants. Historical examples, such as the FIFA crisis of the mid-2010s, demonstrate how leadership actions—or inactions—can either quell or exacerbate a crisis.
Senior Editor: The formation of an “Athlete Council” was one of the six points announced. Have such measures been effective in other organizations to rebuild trust and improve safety?
Dr. Greene: The potential of an “athlete Council” lies in its legitimacy and independence. When structured effectively, such councils can greatly influence decision-making, as seen in the case of the NFL Players Association, which helped improve player safety conditions via open dialog and negotiated reforms. However, the impact hinges on its independence and authority—mere facade councils without real power risk alienating the very community they aim to serve. For CrossFit, credibility must match intent. The council needs a significant role in crafting safety guidelines, conducting investigations, and having a say in all critical decisions that affect athletes’ wellbeing.
Senior Editor: Considering these tensions, what strategies should CrossFit adopt to engage athletes who wish to support reform from within, rather than opting for boycott?
Dr. Greene: Engagement strategies should focus on open channels of communication. CrossFit can organize forums or town hall-style meetings that include both elite and grassroots athletes to gather diverse perspectives. Successful implementation of feedback loops is crucial—demonstrating that athlete voices directly influence policy changes. Looking at broader sports governance, FIFA’s efforts to include athlete representatives in policy-making after facing significant criticism offer a model.CrossFit should also highlight changes and improvements continually, using organizational communication platforms and success stories.
Senior Editor: As we move forward, what lasting impacts could the 2025 boycott have on CrossFit and the fitness community at large?
Dr. Greene: Long-lasting impacts could vary depending on how CrossFit addresses the issues. Positive reforms instituted now could dramatically enhance CrossFit’s image as an association that truly prioritizes its athletes, leading to increased loyalty and growth. Conversely, failing to address the core concerns may result in sustained or even expanded dissent, potentially spurring the rise of alternative fitness movements or leaders in the CrossFit space who promise more athlete-centric governance. it’s a critical juncture for CrossFit, and their response will likely set the tone for their relevance and leadership in the international fitness community for years to come.
Final Takeaway
The CrossFit Rebellion is more than just a boycott; it’s a pivotal moment that challenges long-standing cultural and governance practices within the CrossFit community. Whether CrossFit LLC can implement changes that truly align with athlete demands will determine its trajectory moving forward. By embracing transparency, leadership reform, and genuine athlete engagement, CrossFit can navigate this crisis and rebuild trust—or risk fragmenting its community base further.
What are your thoughts on this developing story? Share your insights in the comments below or join the conversation on social media platforms. Your voice matters in shaping the future of CrossFit and its community.