Ryanair will only return to Brussels airport when flight tax disappears, says CEO
URL: https://www.brusselstimes.com/belgium-news/285473/ryanair-will-only-return-to-brussels-airport-when-flight-tax-disappears-says-ceo
Ryanair appelle l’Arizona à revoir sa copie au sujet de la taxe sur les billets d’avion
URL: https://www.dhnet.be/actu/belgique/2025/02/14/ryanair-appelle-larizona-a-revoir-sa-copie-au-sujet-de-la-taxe-sur-les-billets-davion-elle-aura-un-impact-prejudiciable-sur-leconomie-belge-5C4AVALLKFHEJII5GLKCP46HYM/
Ryanair base Brussels-Zaventem remains permanently closed
URL: https://www.aviation.direct/ryanair-base-brussels-zaventem-remains-permanently-closed
Ryanair’s Brussels Standoff: Teh Flight Tax Dispute
Table of Contents
Ryanair has recently announced the permanent closure of its Brussels-Zaventem base, citing escalating costs and a new flight tax as contributing factors. Experts beleive this decision could have critically important repercussions for both the airline and Belgian travelers.In this interview, aviation expert dr.Amelia Croft sheds light on the situation’s complexities and potential outcomes.
The Impact of the Flight Tax
Senior Editor: Dr.Croft, Ryanair’s CEO has stated unequivocally that the airline will only return to Brussels-Zaventem when the new flight tax is removed. Could you elaborate on the reasoning behind this stance?
Dr. Croft: Certainly. Ryanair has always maintained that excessive taxation harms the overall affordability of air travel, notably for budget-conscious passengers. The newly introduced taxes [[1]] in Belgium, including a €2 levy on EU departures and a so-called ”eco tax” of €10 for shorter flights [[2]],are viewed by Ryanair as especially burdensome. They argue that thes taxes drive up ticket prices, ultimately deterring passengers and possibly leading to a decline in tourism and connectivity.
Long-term Consequences
Senior Editor: What are the wider implications of Ryanair’s decision to withdraw from Brussels-Zaventem?
Dr. Croft This move undeniably has significant ramifications. Firstly, it reduces competition at Brussels-Zaventem, potentially leading to higher prices for passengers who are now reliant on fewer carriers. Secondly,the closure of a major base like this could impact local airport staff and businesses that rely on air travel. More broadly, it sends a message to other airlines about Belgium’s policy environment, potentially discouraging future investment in the country’s aviation sector.
Ryanair’s Actions and Potential Solutions
Senior Editor: Since Ryanair has publicly stated their demand, what are the likeliest next steps in this situation?
Dr. Croft:** it’s likely that Ryanair will continue to exert pressure on the Belgian government through public statements and lobbying efforts, seeking a reversal of the flight tax. The Belgian government, conversely, may argue that the tax is necessary to promote environmental sustainability and revenue generation. A compromise could involve adjustments to the tax rates or a more targeted approach, perhaps exempting specific types of flights or offering exemptions to encourage tourism. However, reaching a mutually agreeable solution may be challenging given the strong positions held by both sides.
A Challenging Outlook
Senior Editor: Thank you for your insightful analysis, Dr. Croft.
Dr.Croft: My pleasure.
Ryanair’s decision to withdraw from Brussels-Zaventem highlights the complex interplay between economic factors,environmental concerns,and government policy. Finding a balanced solution that addresses the concerns of both airlines and the public will be crucial for ensuring a sustainable future for air travel in Belgium.
